similar to: Programmer Needed For a Game Development Project

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Thiago, > > The coding standards (which have been finalized and comitted) don't dictate names for local variables. > Do you like the fact that local variables start with capital letter? Following the same convention used to name classes? It's a very strange adoption. I like the way that

Hi, It will probably take a few weeks or a month before the "Mapping High-Level Constructs to LLVM IR" document is ready for prime time. Until then, you can review and study it at this URL: https://github.com/archfrog/llvm-doc/blob/master/MappingHighLevelConstructsToLLVMIR.rst Please notice that I specifically do not advocate reviewing the document for a week or two. But feel free

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >> I enjoyed the new coding style in recent patches. Camel case makes it easy >> to pick a descriptive name. Starting functions and variables with lower >> cases reduces chances to conflict with a type name. > Honestly speaking, I don't. Especially in the cases when varname is

Dear all, This is a simple probability problem. I want to know, How to generate a normal distribution with mean=1, min=0.2 and max=0.8? I know how the generate a normal distribution of mean = 1 and sd = 1 and with 500 data point. rnorm(n=500, m=1, sd=1) But, I am confusing with how to generate a normal distribution with expected min and max. I expect to hear your directions. Thanks in

On 6 May 2016 at 22:57, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > The major weapon of harassers is arguing whether something is actually > harassing. It is difficult to enforce a CoC if you have to have a month long > nasty argument about whether it was violated. It burns out people like you. The major weapon about enforcers is *not* wanting to argue. Harassment is a very

Greetings all; I''ve just moved my app into production and BackgrounDRb is writing to development.log. The backgroundrb.yml file specifies production, as does environment.rb. A little background (no pun intended ;-0 ) I''m using the ''old'' version of backgroundrb for session management. In the app, whenever a visitor changes pages I record the time in a db

On 06/04/2012 03:25 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > I'm pretty sure neither llvm nor clang have any technical debt at all. > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:18 PM, reed kotler<rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> something to think about as llvm and clang grows. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_debt >> _______________________________________________ >>

>>>>> Jeroen Ooms <jeroenooms at gmail.com> >>>>> on Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:05:51 +0200 writes: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Martin Maechler > <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >> As I've found it is not at all hard to add an option >> which checks the existence and if the directory is no >>

Well, differences of opinion is what makes horse races. Reed On 06/04/2012 04:57 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:53 PM, reed kotler<rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> On 06/04/2012 03:25 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >>> I'm pretty sure neither llvm nor clang have any technical debt at all. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:18 PM, reed

On 17 November 2013 05:15, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > I finally got it to work - and my ODROID-XU is now a passive member of the > LLVM builder society for the next week or so, until it has proven itself > (it monitors changes to the SVN repository and builds in my end without > bothering anyone at LLVM.org about its findings). I did write up a

Stuart, Thanks for that. I see that something similar to 0001-randr12-multiple-encoders-per-connector-DVI-I.patch has been comitted to git. RAOF has rebuilt his PPA and with that build of nouveau (1:0.0.10~git20080918-0~ppa1~hardy) X is starting and running. It is bugging me that I cant work out which git commit RAOFs PPA was built from. Cheers, Mark C On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:51 +0100,

>Here are the FreeBSD and Win32 versions of TimeValue.cpp (along with all >the other Win32 changes I've submitted that have yet to be comitted). Please give me a hint when the files are committed... I have some fixes to commit, too. Thanks. Henrik _________________________________________________________________ F� alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger

I'm getting this: /home/ghost/Work/llvm-cvs/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp: In member function `void llvm::SelectionDAGLowering::visitSetCC(llvm::User&, llvm::ISD::CondCode, llvm::ISD::CondCode, llvm::ISD::CondCode)': /home/ghost/Work/llvm-cvs/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp:1107: error: ` UnsafeFPMath' undeclared (first use this function)

On Dec 3, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Thiago Farina wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Anton Korobeynikov > <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >>> I enjoyed the new coding style in recent patches. Camel case makes it easy >>> to pick a descriptive name. Starting functions and variables with lower >>> cases reduces chances to conflict with a type name. >>

On Dec 4, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Thiago Farina wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> Thiago, >> >> The coding standards (which have been finalized and comitted) don't dictate names for local variables. >> > > Do you like the fact that local variables start with capital letter? > Following the same

Hi Renato, My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)? I will have to move it sometime because it is somewhat noise once it begins to build. Do you know if I can plug in

Can we get back to the substantive discussion about your ideas for lessening the technical debt? On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:05 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > Well, differences of opinion is what makes horse races. > > Reed > > > On 06/04/2012 04:57 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:53 PM, reed kotler<rkotler at

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:53 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > On 06/04/2012 03:25 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >> >> I'm pretty sure neither llvm nor clang have any technical debt at all. >> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:18 PM, reed kotler<rkotler at mips.com>  wrote: >>> >>> something to think about as llvm and clang grows.

On 6 May 2016 at 22:21, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> How many is "many, many", actually? How many of these are really in fear, how many are just trying to impose their mindset without actually planning to contribute in earnest, how many are so fearful that they should really seek professional help? > > And this is illustrating my

Hello at all ! What is the correct form to give a list form R (e.g. list(c(-1,1), "TestFile") ) to C. I have no problems, if I don't use character and I have also no problems to give a character vector form R to C. But, if I combine real and strings in a list then I don't know the correct syntax. I try it with following (an example): SEXP writeFile(SEXP headerR){ Image