similar to: Passwordless Login Auth

Hi, I have been using rsync for many years and never had any kind of problem. Lately I am running out of RAM trying to do an incremental backup to a box that only has 2G of RAM. The entire directory structure I'm mirroring is about 200G of files. A minority of subdirectories have many files. Is there a way to do an incremental backup with --delete option that does not use as much memory? Is

Hey all, I'm in the process of writing some scripts which I want to be able to take actions on my local mailbox. (For example, to move a subset of messages to the trash over time, if unread for a week. To act on messages in my learn-spam folder and then delete them). What occured to me as being a Neat Idea is if Dovecot could honor ident (rfc1413) lookups, from trusted hosts (i.e.

since years mutt, 'cause it really sucks. I tried TB or claws, evolution, opera but always returned to mutt. Am 18. November 2016 06:31:43 MEZ, schrieb Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com>: >On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:07:15 -0800 >lists at lazygranch.com wrote: > >> FWIW, I use claws, which is about the only one not mentioned.? >> >> I don't like

Hi All, I setup Fetchmail and wanted to use Mutt to read e-mail. I used to use Pine and I just am sick of GUI e-mail clients these days. Bloat, complication and unreliable. Pine was my first ever e-mail client. I prefer to use POP still as I want may mail on my machine at all times. I can go into mutt and execute: 'fetchmail -v' and watch it bring down my e-mail. But in mutt i dont see

* lists at lazygranch.com <lists at lazygranch.com>: > So does mutt suck or not? If you work with vi and like it, chances are you will also like mutt. Personally I *love* mutt! No extra fat. Always on the spot. It is "liberal in what it receives and conservative in how it sends". Since it is command line program, I can run it almost everywhere. It supports local mailboxes,

Hi, On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:16:47AM -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > If you were using --link-dest to make multiple backups you wouldn't > need --delete because the target is always a new empty directory (with > - --link-dest pointing to the previous backup run). The source is around 200G and the target box only has 500G total and some of it is used for other data. What I want to do

Hello, I am trying to configure pine.conf for all users and running into an issue. In this setup, Mailbox format is Maildir and Maildir location is /Mail/Username/{new,cur,..etc} First thing required in alpine was patch for maildir and this has already been done. After that I have tried setting up folder-collection Mail #md ../../Mail/username and also tried using #mc (not sure which one is

Hi, Found CloneBasicBlock utility only does the cloning without any remapping. Consider below example: Input block: sw.epilog: ; preds = %sw.bb20, %sw.bb15, %sw.bb10, %sw.bb6, %sw.bb2, %sw.bb, %while.body, %if.end29 %no_final.1 = phi i32 [ %no_final.055, %while.body ], [ 1, %if.end29 ], [ %no_final.055, %sw.bb20 ], [ %no_final.055, %sw.bb15 ], [

Dear Colleagues, I have made mailboxes in ~/Mail available via IMAP (Dovecot 2.3.2.1), that is: "mail_location = mbox:~/Mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u" However, I often read and modify the mailboxes locally with mutt (e.g. append and delete mails). Should I expect any problems wit Dovecot indexes etc? What if I even do "rm ~/Mail/some/mailbox", will Dovecot be mad at me? --

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:14:02 -0500 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 11/17/2016 10:58 AM, Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote: > > I have over 620K emails in over 1000 folders. This turns Thunderbird > > into an all day affair, just to refresh its caches. > > There are lots of knobs you can tweak to improve the situation, but >

Look up "roundcube", really straight forward configuration, once installed type in the IP of your server publishing it on a web browser and it will walk you through configuring it On 18 Nov 2016 07:16, <lists at lazygranch.com> wrote: > So does mutt suck or not? > > Original Message > From: Andreas Kalex > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:06 PM > To:

I submitted the problem report to clang's bugzilla but no one seems to care so I have to send it to the mailing list. clang 3.7 svn (trunk 229055 as the time I was to report this problem) generates slower code than 3.5 (Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn)) for the following code. It is a "8 queens puzzle" solver written as an educational example. As

The regressions in the performance of generated code, introduced by the llvm 3.6 release, don't seem to be limited to this 8 queens puzzle" solver test case. See... http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm-clang-3.5-3.6-rc1&num=1 where a bit hit in the performance of the Sparse Matrix Multiply test of the SciMark v2.0 benchmark was observed as well as others.

Using the SciMark 2.0 code from http://math.nist.gov/scimark2/scimark2_1c.zip compiled with the same... make CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native" I am able to reproduce the 22% performance regression in the run time of the Sparse matmult benchmark. For 10 runs of the scimark2 benechmark, I get 998.439+/-0.4828 with the release llvm clang 3.5.1 compiler and 1217.363+/-1.1004 for the current

My email workflow with Dovecot is that mail gets delivered to INBOX, where I handle it and then move it into a folder called archive. I have alpine set to use the Default sort of "THREAD" of a folder. After moving a (few) mail(s) from INBOX to archive, archive takes a long time (10-50s) to load while alpine tells me: [Sorting "archive" ... ] (I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 11/17/2016 10:58 AM, Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote: >> I have over 620K emails in over 1000 folders. This turns Thunderbird >> into an all day affair, just to refresh its caches. > > There are lots of knobs you can tweak to improve the situation, but the >

Hi, Does anyone have any appropriate debian control files so that I can create a .deb package for FLAC? I don't want to just compile it and overwrite in case it gets automatically overwritten by the Debian package management tools. Cheers Andy

Joseph Tam wrote: > > > However, I often read and modify the mailboxes locally with mutt (e.g. > > append and delete mails). > > > > Should I expect any problems wit Dovecot indexes etc? What if I even > > do "rm ~/Mail/some/mailbox", will Dovecot be mad at me? > > I do it all the time. Works fine. Great, thank you! > > As others have

Hi, I've just upgraded dovecot from 2.2.35 to 2.3.2.1 on my mail server and noticed something odd. My mail clients (mutt and Apple mail) both stopped seeing new mail in my mailboxes. For example, ~/Maildir/mailinglist1/new has 5 new mails. In mutt, vieweing the list of mailboxes mutt reports 0 new mail for "mailinglist1". Opening up the actual mailbox in mutt reveals the 5 new

On 2018-05-05 (06:52 MDT), Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > >> And yet it is. > > in muttrc you miss ~ or $(HOME)/something No. >> Root has been aliased for decades. This has no impact on where and how >> mutt stores the mail it sends as root out of root?s crontab. > > root user can read mail files for all unix users, thats your fail, maybe