similar to: "too little data" error still occurring in 1.0.10

Hi there, we are using tinc in switched mode for over a year now, currently with 18 clients which are connected 24 hours a day and many which aren't connected the whole day, also. If i'm reading the changes from 1.0.9 to 1.0.10 and 1.0.11 correctly, tinc should work now, although "TCPOnly = yes" isn't set in the config files of clients which are behind a NAT firewall, e.g. a

A few weeks back we opened a TAR with Oracle support to determine whether an OCFS (1.0.9-12) + async configuration was considered supportable. At first a technician said yes, but I followed up with Wim's explanation of how that combination is potentially troublesome and inadequately tested. The technician double-checked, then confirmed that OCFS + async is considered risky. He did say that a

I successfully have OCFS running in a two-node RAC environment using RHAS 3 (2.4.21-4.EL) using Qlogic 2310 cards. IO performance, however, was terrible with the combination of OCFS and the Qlogic cards. After extensive testing, OCFS did fine on its own, as did the fibre cards. Put the two together, and everything literally ran twice as slow. Support at Qlogic pointed me to

I have noticed that OCFS is not updating the filesystem space stats when datafiles are reduced in size: is this Bug 62, and if so is there an expected fix date? ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.11-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 Linux sgl43d-122 2.4.9-e.35enterprise #1 SMP Wed Jan 7 15:11:27 EST 2004 i686 unknown bytes name 2097152000 /data/oracle/QSG40/u01/dtr_med_i_02.dbf /dev/sdc1

Hi All, we are using Red Hat 2.1 Kernel e38 along with MSA 1000. ocfs version being used is $ rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 Database Version is 9.2.0.5 However we find that the performance of the database on OCFS is too slow. even a select count(1) from all_tables takes like a while to complete. We initially assumed RAC is

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15

Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15

Hi all, Sorry to break in, but I find this thread a bit interesting. Jeram: I'm not very familiar with HP storage and cannot find too much info on the EVA 6000 array. Is it related to the EVA 5000 somehow, or is it a NAS array? In any case, how is the array configured. If the algorithm for hartbeat is as described earlier (36 sector reads and one write per second (per host???)) then you

I'm trying to install ocfs using RHAS 2.1 uniprocessor kernel on a vmware gsx server 3.0 virtual machine and I'm getting the unresolved symbols error when I try to start ocfs. I'm using the following packages: ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-2.4.9-e-1.0.11-1.i686.rpm My kernel is 2.4.9-e.38 uniprocessor (compiled by me). Questions: 1) Am I using the

Ivan, I found the same thing after doing an upgrade a couple of months ago and mailed this list. Never got a response. We had to fdisk the shared disks and remount them and restore db from backup. Chris Taylor Sr. Oracle DBA Unique Solutions www.unisolinc.com Office: 336-667-2447 xt. 2242 Cell: 336-262-5545 -----Original Message----- From: ocfs-users-request at oss.oracle.com

Hi, I am trying to install Oracle 9i RAC on SLES 8 SP3 with a shared firewire disk. I am using the following OCFS: OCFS Release 1.0.11-1 for suse sp3 2.4.21-138 smp kernel ocfs-2.4.21-138-smp-1.0.11-1.i586.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.10-1.i386.rpm 1/ I have configured OCFS and a shared file system /opt/oracle/oradata 2/ I have created a raw device for use as quorum

Had a problem starting Oracle after expanding an EMC Metalun. We get the following errors: >WARNING: OemInit2: Opened file(/oradata/dbf/quorum.dbf 8), tid = main:1024 file = oem.c, line = 491 {Sun Apr 17 10:33:41 2005 } >ERROR: ReadOthersDskInfo(): ReadFile(/oradata/dbf/quorum.dbf) failed(5) - (0) bytes read, tid = main:1024 file = oem.c, line = 1396 {Sun Apr 17 10:33:41 2005 }

Hi, all. My name is Kenichiro Ochi, in Oracle Japan Support. Customer examines upgrading OCFS from 1.0.9-12 to 1.0.14-1. And customer asked us a question about the way of downgrading to 1.0.9-12. (customer presumes a case in case after the upgrade.) We tested the following... 0.After the upgrade 1.umount OCFS volume on all nodes 2.uninstall rpm (V1.0.14-1) # rpm -e ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 # rpm

Hi, Is this "Unresolved Symbols" issue only occurring on VMware with e.38? We have OCFS users want to update their kernel to e.34 or e.38 without VMware. Please advise, Thanks! Roger--- -----Original Message----- From: Wim Coekaerts [mailto:wim.coekaerts@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:20 PM To: Sunil Mushran Cc: ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: ENC: ENC:

I followed your instruction to compile OCFS and received the following errors: [root@RAC1 ocfs-1.0.11]# ./configure --with-kernel=/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-e.38/linux checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are

Dear All, When it rains, it pours. I just got an emergency email that a chilled water feed to the Computer Science department stopped working, causing the temperature in some of the machine rooms to get over 100 degrees F. Machines in those rooms have been turned off to prevent damage. It looks like llvm.org has been affected, but the mailing lists are still working. However, temperatures

we are running OCFS on 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 I have been deleting datafiles, more than 3 times successfully for rman duplication, from a mount point /data1 (total 191G). Last week when I tried to delete datafiles from the same directory, it did delete datafiles but did not release (reclaim) all space. It still showed that 20G of

libICE provides the API for the Inter-Client Exchange protocol. This release provides a fix for CVE-2017-2626 for platforms which don't have arc4random_buf() in their default libraries but do have getentropy(), such as Linux platforms with a kernel version of 3.17 or newer and a glibc version of 2.25 or newer. (libICE 1.0.9 already ensured that arc4random_buf() is used on platforms that

As I said before, I'm not a linux expert. In which file of kernel source can I look for any missing code ? And specially what do I have to check ? __________________________________________ Mauro Staretz - MI Montreal Inform?tica Ltda Microsoft MCSE+I / MCDBA / MCP - Oracle OCP Tel: 55-21-2291-6116 R.2104 Fax: 55-21-2533-6028 __________________________________________ -----Mensagem

I am trying to use: ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.11-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 with RedHat AS 3.0, 2-node cluster with shared SCSI. 2 dell 1650s, dual CPUs, PERC 3/DC cards chained to a PowerVault 220S. I am using lvm, and here is my layout: [root@cluster1 archive]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda2 32G 5.1G 25G