similar to: findInterval

>>>>> Gabor Grothendieck >>>>> on Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:21:55 -0400 writes: > Suppose we have `dat` shown below and we want to find the the `y` value > corresponding to the last value in `x` equal to the corresponding component > of `seek` and we wish to return an output the same length as `seek` using > `findInterval` to perform the

What should findInterval(x,vec,all.inside=TRUE) return when length(vec)<=1, so there are no inside intervals? R-3.3.0 gives a decreasing map of x->output when length(vec)==1 and -1's when length(vec)==0. Would '0' in all those cases be better? > findInterval(x=c(10, 11, 12), vec=11, all.inside=TRUE, rightmost.closed=FALSE, left.open=FALSE) [1] 1 0 0 >

Dear R users, the help for findInterval(x,vec) suggests a logarithmic dependence on N (=length(vec)), which would imply a binary search type algorithm. However, when I "test" this hypothesis, in the following manner: set.seed(-3645); l <- vector(); N.seq <- c(5000, 500000, 1000000, 10000000, 50000000);k <- 1 for (N in N.seq){ tmp <- sort(round(stats::rt(N, df=2), 2));

I've found over time that R documentation that comes off as terse at first blush is usually revealed to be precise, concise, and complete on close reading.? I'm sure this is also true of `?findInterval`, but for whatever reason my brain simply refuses to extract meaning from it. Part of the problem may be that we interact with the function via a compressed form of the bounds of the

Dear R Community, I hope you might be able to assist with a small problem creating a function. I am working with water-quality data sets that contain the concentration of many different elements in water samples. I need to assign quality-control flags to values that fall into various concentration ranges. Rather than a web of nested if statements, I am employing the findInterval function to

Hello Wise Ones... I need a clever way around a problem with findInterval. Consider: vec1 <- 1:10 vec2 <- seq(1, 10, by = 0.1) x1 <- c(2:3) a1 <- findInterval(x1, vec1); a1 # example 1 a2 <- findInterval(x1, vec2); a2 # example 2 In the problem I'm working on, vec* may be either integer or numeric, like vec1 and vec2. I need to remove one or more sections of this vector;

>>>>> brodie gaslam via R-devel >>>>> on Thu, 5 Mar 2020 22:18:33 +0000 (UTC) writes: > I've found over time that R documentation that comes off as terse at > first blush is usually revealed to be precise, concise, and complete > on close reading.? I'm sure this is also true of `?findInterval`, but > for whatever reason my

Hi all, I am writing some C code where I want to use the findInterval function documented in "Writing R extensions/Utility functions". i.e. the C-version not the R version. It all compiles but the shared library is causing seg-faults and I'm obviously stuffing something up. Has anyone got any examples of calling this function they'd be will to share? I've searched through

I'm using the range command to get the minimum and maximum values of an array as in x <- range(array_y) which gives me two values such as [1] -2 9 I need to be able to test if this range of values includes a third value. For example I'd like to query 1) does the range of -2 to 9 include 3, answer TRUE 2) does the range of -2 to 9 include -6, answer FALSE? All values could be

Tengo 2 grandes inquietudes: Necesito aplicar la función findInterval a una lista donde su componentes son matrices(32x32), cuyos intervalos se conformaron de la siguiente manera: 1er paso. # a todas las matrices se las dividió en matrices superiores e inferiores d_sup <- lapply(Matriz,function(x){data.matrix(upper.tri(x)*x)}) d_inf <-

Is there a generic binary search routine in a standard library which a) works for character vectors b) runs in O(log(N)) time? I'm aware of findInterval(x,vec), but it is restricted to numeric vectors. I'm also aware of various hashing solutions (e.g. new.env(hash=TRUE) and fastmatch), but I need the greatest-lower-bound match in my application. findInterval is also slow for

> On Apr 19, 2018, at 1:22 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > > >> On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Ding, Yuan Chun <ycding at coh.org> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I want to create a categorical variable, cat.pfoa, in the file of pfas.pheno (a data frame) based on log2pfoa values. I can do it using the following code.

> On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Ding, Yuan Chun <ycding at coh.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I want to create a categorical variable, cat.pfoa, in the file of pfas.pheno (a data frame) based on log2pfoa values. I can do it using the following code. > > pfas.pheno <-within(pfas.pheno, {cat.pfoa<-NA > cat.pfoa[pfas.pheno$log2pfoa

Dear All, I would like to ask you help with the following: Assume that I have an area of 36 cells (or sub-areas) sr<-matrix(data=seq(from=1,to=36),nrow=6,ncol=6,byrow=TRUE) > sr [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [1,] 1 2 3 4 5 6 [2,] 7 8 9 10 11 12 [3,] 13 14 15 16 17 18 [4,] 19 20 21 22 23 24 [5,] 25 26 27 28 29 30 [6,]

Hi, I have a mysql table with fields userid,track,frequency e.g u1,1,10 u1,2,100 u1,3,110 u1,4,200 u1,5,120 u1,6,130 . u2,1,23 . . where "frequency" is the number of times a music track is played by a "userid" I need to turn my 'frequency' table into a rating table (it's for a recommender system). So, for each user, I need to categorise the frequency of tracks

Begin forwarded message: > From: David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> > Date: January 26, 2011 8:32:30 AM EST > To: Alaios <alaios at yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [R] MAtrix addressing > > > On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Alaios wrote: > >> Unfortunately right now is convoluted... by I was trying to find >> some solution. >> Bring again

Hi! I have a dataset that looks like this: 0.0 14 0.0 3 0.9 12 0.73 15 0.78 2 1.0 15 0.3 2 0.32 8 ...and so on. I.e. a value between 0 and 1, and a number I would like to plot this in a histogram-like manner. I would like to have a set of bins, each 0.1 wide, and plot the sum of values in column 2 that falls within each bin. I.e, in this case I would like the first bin, 0.0, to have the

In findInterval's help page, it says 'v[i[j]] <= x[j] < v[i[j] + 1]'. I'm wondering if there is a variant of it such that 'v[i[j]] < x[j] <= v[i[j] + 1]'.

It seems that Tablegen is generating intrinsic ID's off by in DAGISel.inc In DAGISel.inc, I have the following pattern: int64_t CN1 = Tmp0->getZExtValue(); // Pattern: (intrinsic_w_chain:f32 103:iPTR, GPRF32:f32:$src0, GPRF32:f32:$src1, GPRF32:f32:$src2) // Emits: (MACRO_FMA_f32:f32 GPRF32:f32:$src0, GPRF32:f32:$src1, GPRF32:f32:$src2) // Pattern complexity = 8 cost

I am attempting to emulate the VLOOKUP function from Excel in R. I want to compare one column (coll.minus.release) with another (release.days) to get the number of parasitoid released at that time (TotalParasitoids). for example: coll.minus.release release.days ParasitoidTotal -12 -266 1700 8 -259 1000 8