similar to: postfix virtual maildir

Greetings All, I have a ssh server which allows sftp connections from the Internet while ssh connections from within the local net, here is the config: Code: Port 11111 Port 11113 Protocol 2 LogLevel DEBUG

Hi everyone, I have a problem at my Trixbox that is version Asterisk "1.2.26.1 svn rev 79171" and 2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp kernel version. Two Digium 4fxs+4fxo card has been installed and everything was working before made yum update and at this server. (Centos 4.0). After update I faced with "zaptel not loading" problems. I have solved these problems too but now when I try to call

connection will remain a TCP connection unless it is broken and restarted. Usually if I stop the client and wait for about 30 seconds to reconnect, there is a much greater chance that the MTU probes work fine, and in about 30 seconds MTU is fixed to 1416. Every time when the MTU probing fails, I see latency between 700 - 1000 ms with 32 byte pings over a LAN. Every time when the MTU probing does

I have a Dell server with four bonded, gigabit interfaces. Bonding mode is 802.3ad, xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4. When testing this setup with iperf, I never get more than a total of about 3Gbps throughput. Is there anything to tweak to get better throughput? Or am I running into other limits (e.g. was reading about tcp retransmit limits for mode 0). The iperf test was run with iperf -s on the

Hi. I am having the following warning when using music on hold. It works from X-Lite to Grandstream. I get a lot of errors and warnings. 1.Warning, flexibel rate not heavily tested! 2. NOTICE[1100258240]: res_musiconhold.c:260 monmp3thread: Request to schedule in the past?!?! Thanks for any help. Full Output below: Jan 30 10:24:55 WARNING[1133718080]: chan_sip.c:486

would like some input on this one please. Two CentOS 5.5 XEN servers, with 1GB NIC's, connected to a 1GB switch transfer files to each other at about 30MB/s between each other. Both servers have the following setup: CentOS 5.5 x64 XEN 1GB NIC's 7200rpm SATA HDD's The hardware configuration can't change, I need to use these servers as they are. They are both used in production

I'm redesigning our mail server which holds several hundred mailboxes - most are local system users and some are virtual domains that we host. I understand that the 1.0x stable release allows for multiple auth mechinisms, so that I could use both PAM for local users and a passwd-file for the virtuals. If I want to stick with 0.99x can I mix and match in a single passwd-file the

No worries. Now you are not using the passthrough(-p) mode. That is why dovecot is telling you that your client is not compatible. Using "script" without -p would require you to implement that protocol: http://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/health_check.html#script-protocol. I believe all you want to do is to keep this line executable = script -p health-check.sh and just replace

I have two boxes for the purpose of testing traffic control and my knowledge thereof (which is at the inkling stage). The boxes are connected by 100Mbit ethernet cards via a switch. For egress traffic via eth0 I achieve a throughput that is close to the specified CEILing, particularly for values above 1mbit. Ingress traffic does not seem so well behaved. Above about 1mbit rates achieved are

Hi, I have an interesting problem that the dial out via sip always generates 603 error The following is the sip debug Your help is appreciated. CK == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Executing [998560848 at DLPN_DP1:1] Dial("SIP/6100-0000005b", "SIP/13398560848 at hkbn2b") in new stack == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 Audio is at 113.253.230.26 port 11316 Adding codec 0x8

I can't yet use -p, the version I have is not supporting it still :( Maybe it is better to wait until alpine linux updates the package. -----Original Message----- Subject: RE: Health check curl example No worries. Now you are not using the passthrough(-p) mode. That is why dovecot is telling you that your client is not compatible. Using "script" without -p would require you

:) I really starting to feel a bit like an idiot, but all these 3 configs[0] give error 'Client not compatible with this binary' [0] service health-check { executable = script /bin/health-check.sh inet_listener health-check { port = 5001 } } service health-check { executable = script -e "HOME PATH" /bin/health-check.sh inet_listener health-check { port =

Am 14.08.20 um 11:45 schrieb Bruno Kiste: > I try to use dovecot as a MTA with postfix. > But it does not accept incoming mails. > Why does it not work? > > [root at localhost bruno]# dovecot --version > 2.3.8 (9df20d2db) > > /var/log/maillog > Aug 14 11:03:32 localhost dovecot[566097]: lmtp(566373): Connect from > local > Aug 14 11:03:32 localhost dovecot[566097]:

Hi, you can use telnet or netcat to send input to that port and receive the answer. echo "PING" | nc localhost 5001 Best regards Markus On 11/24/19 2:43 PM, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote: > > How do I check the standard script then on this port 5001 from the > command line? > > > This one of alpine linux also does not have it yet > bash-5.0# dovecot

The -e parameter is used to define a "list of environment variables", so the error message telling you that you did not define a script is right. So far i understood that you wanted to use passthrough mode, so do not use -e but -p. (except you need to define some environment-variables for your script). Executing the script executable standalone does not work it must be started from

====================================================== "Thousands of candles can be lighted from a single candle, and the life of the candle will not be shortened. Happiness never decreases by being shared." Buddha ======================================================

====================================================== "Thousands of candles can be lighted from a single candle, and the life of the candle will not be shortened. Happiness never decreases by being shared." Buddha ======================================================

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> Yes. The passthrough option is rather new. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 24/11/2019 15:28 Marc Roos via dovecot < <a

Hi! I have just started with traffic shaping, and after hours of reading websites, man pages asf. I am still stumped at one problem I have. The interface eth0 is attached to the outside world, and I have an openvpn tunnel to another part of the organization using eth0 and port 5001. The idea was that all traffic going through the tunnel would have top priority and the rest share