similar to: shared Sent and Junk folders

Hi All, I've got a brand new dovecot installation. I'm new to dovecot, so please be gentle :-) Anyway, I'm getting some errors when I try to connect to dovecot. I've tried searching the web and haven't been able to find a lot of information. Here's the config info: # dovecot --version 1.1.2 # dovecot -n sudo dovecot -n # 1.1.2: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf base_dir:

I have had this problem on and off since RedHat 6, and I always worked through it, but I thought I would ask. When you have multiple network interfaces, how does the system determine the default route? Or is it the first, (or last) interface that comes up? On the problem systems I have to add a "route add default..." statement in some systems in the rc.local to get them to work right.

I have an Infortrend RAID box I'd like to see as one big 6TB partition, but I only can get 2.2TB partitions to work. I was trying to do this with an Adaptec controller but apparently they are only (any of them) 48 bits wide. Does anybody have a working system for SCSI/Centos over 2.2TB? Milt Mallory Topix.com 650-461-8316 Always consider the issues of progressive enhancement and

Hello all this is my first post to this list so i would like to than you all in advance for your time and consideration. I am in the process of building a new server and have purchased some used hardware. There seems to be some hardware issuses and i am hoping nothing was damaged during shipping. However i am in contact with intel and we are tring to figure out the exact problem via email. So

Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3092 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080831/2ebe58b8/attachment-0005.bin>

Hello list! http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html -- Pasi

On 27/08/15 10:42, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses wrote: > Please check permissions as this sounds like a permissions issue m I am confused then. /home/vmail/Maildir is 700 for vmail:vmail. If dovecot-lda runs as vmail then there's no problem, if it runs as root it shouldn't face problems either. How can I determine which user dovecot-lda runs under? Thanks, -- Paulo Matos

On 30 August 2007, Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com> wrote: > Message: 57 <snip> > And, learning how to remove/replace > a defective drive is something I should do. > VMWare is a good way to experiment with things like that. Scott: Thank you for that idea! I don't think any of the boxes in our house have boards that permit virtualization (sp?), but possibly the

Having said that, /home/vmail should be owned by vmail, however dovecot-lda should have write access so 700 is a bad idea. On 27/08/2015 3:00 PM, "Muzaffer Tolga Ozses" <tolga at ozses.net> wrote: > ps aux | grep lda > On 27/08/2015 2:58 PM, "Paulo Matos" <paulo at matos-sorge.com> wrote: > >> On 27/08/15 10:42, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses wrote: >>

I mean, in the source directory. On 12 June 2015 at 15:13, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses <tolga at ozses.net> wrote: > Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things > dovecot. > > On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura <number6 at noisynotes.com> wrote: > >> On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version >> 1.0.15 with:

I installed CentOS 5.4on a WMWare Server virtual machine that's running on win7. Everything seems to work fine except I get a shit load of error messages from the console along the lines of when I type on the keyboard: atkbd.c Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0x81 on isa0060/serio0). atkbd.c Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x81 on isa0060/serio0). *atkbd*.*c*:

I have Centos 5.2 and want to install mapserver. On my Fedora 7 box it is in the repo. Should I just enable that repo? Anyone done this? Tips/warnings? Dave -- Canada must refuse to be entangled in any more wars fought to make the world safe for capitalism. -- The Regina Manifesto, 1933

Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun? If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters. If it hasn't gone out yet, then maybe I'm OK... See... No "is it ready" crap in here!

I have a server with dual nic's running centos 5.2 1 nic connects to the cable modem, which has 15m d and 2m up, but speed tests barely come back at 5mb down including road runner's internal speed test. I hook up my laptop to the same modem, same port, using the same cable and I get 17mb down. I have ruled out iptables, nics (because same result on both nics), cables, cable modem(with

I just reformatted an 8Gb USB drive as ext3. While as FAT32, it was reported as having well over 7Gb free (did not note the exact capacity). I reformatted with mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1 Now it is reported (oh, this is with properties in Nautilus) as having 6.8Gb capacity (free space actually). Does this makes sense that ext3 has less available space than fat32?

Dear All, I need CentOS 4.4 and RHEL4 Update 3 Step-by-Step Text Mode Installation Screen Shots. Please send me the following Installation Screen Shots Details or link Regards -S.Balaji

Hello, is there some way how to disable temporarily account or access to files. I need to backup with tar, but there is problem when tar is reading and some file changed (with --ignore-failed-read it continues but archive is not created and without --ignore-failed-read it fails). Some accounts are huge ;( Need something like qmail sticky bit or world writable directory - qmail is not delivering

Currently, my time server is a Sun v240 with a 32-pci gps card (with a proprietary Solaris driver) attached to our gps receiver via an sma cable up to the roof of my building. As I'm migrating almost all of our Solaris servers and services over to CentOS, I'd like to know what other people are using for time server hardware. Any suggestions? -- Andy Harrison public key: 0x67518262

If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09 version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally did not replace stock components with newer versions. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com