similar to: v1.1.rc6 released won't compile

Hello, I have a dataset d which is >d pop catch 1 66462.01 10807.757 2 87486.73 46257.885 3 57211.64 9345.058 4 71321.62 4892.868 5 100024.89 27334.248 6 104504.91 48535.092 7 95295.51 39348.195 8 93737.35 34343.489 9 89375.05 28750.743 10 95312.65 30755.064 11 100888.17 55404.370 12 84790.23 37751.074 13 81129.82 29277.443 14 69797.09 21500.398

Dear all, I have a function that predicts DV based on one predictor pred: pred<-c(0,3000000,7800000,15600000,23400000,131200000) DV<-c(0,500,1000,1400,1700,1900) ## I define Function 1 that computes the predicted value based on pred values and parameters a and b: calc_DV_pred <- function(a,b) { DV_pred <- rep(0,(length(pred))) for(i in 1:length(DV_pred)){ DV_pred[i] <- a *

> I'll be happy to answer any further questions you may have, feel free to e-mail > me directly (though right now our mail server is down) > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: 1. llvm-ld will be used as "The Optimizer". 2. If the user has specified to generate the final executable, then llvm-ld should run on all the .bc files generated by clang

Hello, At the boot prompt ALLOWOPTIONS 0 is only applied to implicit kernels and not to labels. For configuration which want to allow selection, but prevent customization of the kernel command line, this behaviour is bad. Also the IMPLICIT 0 is applied to both the boot prompt and configuration setting (like DEFAULT); but one could argue that only the command supplied at the prompt make sense to

Two problems with this new beta not found in beta 8. 1. mbox_from_create error This is the configure string I use, and I paste the make error message below. I have to use "--with-storages=maildir,mbox" to get around the error. ./configure \ --prefix=/opt1/dovecot \ --localstatedir=/var \ --without-shadow \ --without-cyrus-sasl2 \ --without-pop3d \ --without-gssapi \ --disable-ipv6 \

Full_Name: Karsten Krug Version: 2.4.0 OS: Open Suse 10.0, Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (88.134.13.50) I found a problem in the 'optimise' function for one dimensional optimisation. Example 1: Try to find a maximum of the function below with the use of 'optimise' in the interval [0,0.5]. The function follows a parabola and has two local maxima located at the margins of

Hi All I''m trying to combine the from_for and select helpers Right now I have form_for :service, :url => ...... do |f| select("abc", "xyz_id", @my_arr.collect {|item| [ item, "bla" ] }, {:prompt => "opt1"} ) .... end What I want to do is something like .... f.select("abc", "xyz_id", @my_arr.collect {|item|

Dear all, I am doing few experiments to do understand optimization phase interactions. Here is a brief description of my experiements. 1. I picked the list of machine independent optimizations acting on llvm IR (those that are enabled at O3). 2. for each optimzation in the optimization-list a) Compiled the program using 'clang -c O0 -flto program.c' b) opt

Hi, I'm using LLVM 1.8 with the GCC4-frontend on a Slackware 10.2 box (GCC 3.3.6). When issuing the following command (line 14 in a script called manual.sh): llvm-ld -O1 *.trans -L${SOME_LIB_DIR} -L${SOME_OTHER_LIB_DIR} -L${LLVM_FRONT}/lib -lSOME_LIB -lSOME_OTHER_LIB -load=${MY_LIB_DIR}/opt1.so -load=${MY_LIB_DIR}/opt2.so -debug-pass=Details -debug -o test ... I get the following

Hi, trying to install a package containing C code and requiring non-default configure argument settings the incantation (this has worked for R <= 2.8.1 on the same architectures) R CMD INSTALL --configure-args="--with-opt1 --with-opt2" packname does always result in a warning Warning: unknown option '--with-opt2' and consequently the option is ignored. Reverting the order

On 19 June 2011 14:44, Suresh Purini <suresh.purini at gmail.com> wrote: >  I am doing few experiments to do understand optimization phase > interactions. Here is a brief description of my experiements. > > 1. I picked the list of machine independent optimizations acting on > llvm IR (those that are enabled at O3). > 2.  for each optimzation in the optimization-list >  

Hi all, Somehow my reply didn't reach this list. I've attached the conclusion. Cheers, Cristian. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20080831/9f467742/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Alasdair King" <alasdairking at

Hello all, I'm a developer in Assistive Technology for blind and other disabled people. I produce and distribute some Free software called WebbIE and the Accessibility suite: http://www.webbie.org.uk Working with blind people, I'm interested in low-cost technologies using audio. Ogg Vorbis is therefore of interest to me. I'd like to install the necessary components for Ogg Vorbis

Hi Sanjiv, Sanjiv Gupta <sanjiv.gupta <at> microchip.com> writes: > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: > [...] As promised, I've implemented a basic compiler driver for the PIC16 toolchain. It's under tools/llvmc/examples/mcc16. Some examples illustrating the features you requested: > 2. If the user has specified to generate the final

Hi all, Sorry for the re-post, I sent my previous e-mail before it was complete. I am trying to model seroprevalence using the differential equation: dP/dt = beta*seronegative*.001*(seropositive)-0.35*(0.999)*(seropositive)-r*seropositive. I would like to estimate my two parameters, beta and r, using maximum likelihood methods. I have included my code below:

Hi Bram, Comments inline .. On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 18:01 +0200, Bram Adams wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using LLVM 1.8 with the GCC4-frontend on a Slackware 10.2 box (GCC > 3.3.6). When issuing the following command (line 14 in a script called > manual.sh): > > llvm-ld -O1 *.trans -L${SOME_LIB_DIR} -L${SOME_OTHER_LIB_DIR} -L > ${LLVM_FRONT}/lib -lSOME_LIB -lSOME_OTHER_LIB

On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 21:00, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to > > get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O > > family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting > > your feedback on this so I can

Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > > Hi Sanjiv, > > Sanjiv Gupta <sanjiv.gupta <at> microchip.com> writes: > > > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: > > [...] > > As promised, I've implemented a basic compiler driver for the > PIC16 toolchain. It's under tools/llvmc/examples/mcc16. > Hi Mikhail, How do you build mcc16

In a previous post (included at the end of the message), Reid stated that in August 2006, llvm-ld did not support native libraries. I have a few questions about that. Is it still true that llvm does not support native libraries? Furthermore, what exactly is meant by that? In particular, I have bytecode that I want to turn into a native executable and it needs to be linked against a dynamic

I'm trying to port llvm-lua so it's buildable with llvm trunk. A problem I'm running into is that it uses the older BlockPlacement pass. From searching around and reading llvm's commit, this pass has been replaced and superseded by Chandler's MachineBlockPlacement pass. What's unclear to me is how exactly do you add this pass to say a function pass manager? The current