similar to: Dovecot immediate logout (imap4)

auth process receives the protocol requested when performing authentication as variable %s (see https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables) You can use this to choose the value you return for port. Aki > On 17 September 2018 at 16:56 Alexander Chekalin <alexander.chekalin at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Seen that URL but port= is strange due to there is no protocol connection. > So

The port is determined with port=nnn setting. You can't return per-protocol port like that, you need to look at the protocol requested by user and return port based on that, or you can omit port to default into "standard port". not using ssl/starttls is default. > On 17 September 2018 at 16:35 Alexander Chekalin <alexander.chekalin at gmail.com> wrote: > > >

Is Binary Content Extension (rfc3516) support planned? -- WBR, Anton Yuzhaninov

Thank you! Ok, so I can omit ssl=no and startssl=no, and this results in default settings for ssl which is 'off'? Or the defaults are 'on' anyway? Can I somehow specify ports on remote hosts that proxy will use to connect to? Like (just image): 'proxy host_imap=10.1.1.1:143 host_pop=10.1.1.1:110' or somehow? On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:33 PM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at

Seen that URL but port= is strange due to there is no protocol connection. So if I set port=12345 then what proto will I see there? Misleading setting this is why I mentioned (non-existing) per-proto port setting above. May I please ask for any example on how to pass port per proto? It is a bit fuzzy for me to figure it out but I do believe you used to use it somehow. On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at

Hi, I try to set up dovecot as a proxy server, to proxy requests to several dovecot-based backend servers. I wand external clients who connects to this proxy Dovecot to use TLS (this is easy to set up) while want to have unsecured (plain IMAP/POP) connections to backends. You see, links to backends are over LAN so no TLS needed, and these backends are poor old machines (with old Docecots like

Hello! Asterisk "CVS-HEAD-08/06/04-14:55:13" won't start on two of three different Gentoo machines. This is the output of gdb: ultra asterisk # gdb /usr/sbin/asterisk GNU gdb 6.0 Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.

I want to buy a new server to run Asterisk and after looking at prices for the Athlon XP 3000+ it costs the same as an Athlon 64 at the same speed rating. I was wondering if Zaptel/Asterisk will compile/work on an Athlon 64? -- Carlos Chavez Director de Tecnolog?a Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V.

There is an updated kernel available for CentOS-3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-188.html refers. Updated files are :- Common Files i386/updates/RPMS/kernel-BOOT-2.4.21-15.EL.c0.i386.rpm i386/updates/RPMS/kernel-doc-2.4.21-15.EL.c0.i386.rpm i386/updates/RPMS/kernel-source-2.4.21-15.EL.c0.i386.rpm athlon specific i386/updates/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-15.EL.c0.athlon.rpm

I have been using a laptop computer of Pentium III 1.13 Ghz. I heard that AMD's Athlon has excellent floating point capacity. So I bought a Athlon 2200+ laptop yesterday. I expected that new Athlon 2200+ will be twice as fast as the P III 1.13 GB. I ran a R simulation program and the new computer is only 30% faster, in fact slightly slower than a Celeron 1.50 GB laptop. I am very disappointed

I've been testing alpha4, and every once in a while my client (Thunderbird 1.5 RC1) tells me the dovecot isn't a valid IMAP4 server. This is usually (maybe always) when I first bring up the client up. If I just ask the client to get the mail again, it does so happily (without any errors). I must say I found dovecot as a pleasant surprise. We have been using UW. Which didn't

Hi Team, I need to develop Visual VoiceMail solution. In this solution I need a IMAP4 server, from which I can get a hit for each mail retrieval. Can anyone help me if dovecot can be used for this purpose. BR, Rajesh Bansal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: > On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named >> Searches (Filters)) or if there is any plan about it. > I have a partial implementation in my patch queue. I haven't worked on > it for a few months now due to other projects that took

I have two questions: 1. What method/tool (other than a MuA) can I use to test my Dovecot setup from Windows CLI when ssl is enabled? I have tried connecting to to the pop3/imap4 services from a Windows PC but here is what I get: [pop3] +OK Dovecot-2.0-sis ready. user wash at domain.co.ke -ERR Plaintext authentication disallowed on non-secure (SSL/TLS) connections. [imap4] OK [CAPABILITY

I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named Searches (Filters)) or if there is any plan about it. -- Jes?s Cea Avi?n _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:43 AM Rajesh Bansal via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > I need to develop Visual VoiceMail solution. In this solution I need a IMAP4 server, from which I can get a hit for each mail retrieval. Can anyone help me if dovecot can be used for this purpose. > That is rather vague. Do you want to do something like

Op 20-10-2019 om 22:33 schreef Jean-Daniel via dovecot: > > >> Le 20 oct. 2019 ? 22:24, Mauricio Tavares via dovecot >> <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> a ?crit : >> >> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:43 AM Rajesh Bansal via dovecot >> <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >>>

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0938 kernel security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0938.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-52.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-52.EL.i686.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-BOOT-2.4.21-52.EL.i386.rpm

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87830 Bug ID: 87830 Summary: I got bright noise screen (static) like on TV after boot. Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component:

Has anybody here taken a HDD configured with an Opteron system, and then put it into an Athlon/64 and had it work? Are they interchangeable, like an Athlon/32 and a P3/P4? -Ben -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978