similar to: ProxyJump: Connection reset by peer

Dear developers, The ProxyJump feature is nowadays implemented on the basis of a TCP port forwarding on the jumping host, isn't it? As a result, this is affected by a AllowTcpForwarding=no configuration on the jumping host. So, may I suggest a variant based on Unix sockets (such as -L or -R does). Nice idea, isn't it? Any volunteer to implement this? Best regards Christophe

Hi, I'm very grateful for the new ProxyJump option. It helps tremendously! One small question I'd like to ask, though: Is there a way to skip one (mostly the first) jump host if the machine is in some specific network? For example, from home, I (resp. a shell script) need to jump to the office's server, a customers' login host, and then to the destination node; from the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2744 Bug ID: 2744 Summary: ProxyJump causes "Killed by signal 1" to be printed in terminal. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.5p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component:

Hello, On macOS, Terminal?s ?New Remote Connection?? command runs ssh in a new window like this: login -pfq $USER /usr/bin/ssh $HOST Here, login executes /usr/bin/ssh with argv[0] set to ?-ssh?. If $HOST has a ProxyJump configuration, the resulting ProxyCommand is: -ssh -W '[%h]:%p' $JUMP_HOST Because of the leading hyphen, this fails to execute. If the user?s shell is zsh, the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3163 Bug ID: 3163 Summary: teach ssh-keyscan to use ssh_config (plus options like ProxyJump) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.4p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3582 Bug ID: 3582 Summary: Confusing error message when using ProxyJump Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024, Rob Leslie wrote: > Hello, > > On macOS, Terminal?s ?New Remote Connection?? command runs ssh in a new window like this: > > login -pfq $USER /usr/bin/ssh $HOST > > Here, login executes /usr/bin/ssh with argv[0] set to ?-ssh?. > > If $HOST has a ProxyJump configuration, the resulting ProxyCommand is: > > -ssh -W '[%h]:%p'

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 Bug ID: 3186 Summary: ProxyJump should include IdentityFile when specified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee:

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: [...] > The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is > unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not record them ("CheckHostIP no"). [...] > Host mytarget > Hostname 172.16.1.2

Hello, it seems I cannot use: $ ssh -J root at 2a01:4f8:1c1e:528d::1 root at west-coast Invalid -J argument (The west-coast is stored on the jump host in between in /etc/hosts.) $ ssh -J root at 167.235.141.44 root at west-coast Works as expected. Also $ ssh root at 2a01:4f8:1c1e:528d::1 does work as expected. I do have native IPv6. This is on Debian 12 Bookworm: $ ssh -V OpenSSH_9.2p1

On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 11:41 +0000, Job Snijders wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:19:24PM +0100, Adam Kalisz wrote: > > it seems I cannot use: > > > > $ ssh -J root at 2a01:4f8:1c1e:528d::1 root at west-coast > > Invalid -J argument > > Try this: > > ??? $ ssh -J root@[2a01:4f8:1c1e:528d::1] root at west-coast Thank you all for helping with the syntax.

> ssh -v test OpenSSH_for_Windows_7.7p1, LibreSSL 2.6.5 debug1: Reading configuration data C:\\Users\\jsore/.ssh/config debug1: C:\\Users\\jsore/.ssh/config line 11: Applying options for test debug1: Setting implicit ProxyCommand from ProxyJump: ssh -v -W '[%h]:%p' apple debug1: Executing proxy command: exec ssh -v -W '[test]:22' apple CreateProcessW failed error:2 posix_spawn:

On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: >> Host mytarget >> Hostname 172.16.1.2 >> ProxyJump user2 at bastion2 > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least 2017, so should not cause

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3057 Bug ID: 3057 Summary: Fork-bomb when misconfiguring a host to ProxyJump onto itself Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.9p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh

On 18/8/23 18:37, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 18.08.23 07:39, Darren Tucker wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> >> wrote: >> [...] >>> The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is >>> unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). >> >> If the IP address is

On 19/8/23 08:00, Stuart Longland VK4MSL wrote: > Would the UserKnownHostsFile be relative to the current working > directory of the `ssh` process at the time of its call, or would it > figure out that these files are relative to > /home/me/workplace/ops/eng-ssh/bigcust-config? Nope? just tried it, at this time it's relative to whatever directory you call `ssh` from. Which if

Hi all, I noticed a bit of an odd issue with maintaining `known_hosts` when the target machine is behind a bastion using `ProxyJump` or `ProxyCommand` with host key clashes. Client for me right now is OpenSSH_9.3p1 on Gentoo Linux/AMD64. I'm a member of a team, and most of us use Ubuntu (yes, I'm a rebel). Another team who actually maintain this fleet often access the same machines

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 17:18, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: [...] > > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. > > Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and > change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least > 2017, so should not cause

On 18.08.23 07:39, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > [...] >> The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is >> unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). > > If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not record > them ("CheckHostIP

Hi there, I'm trying to migrate a domain between two Gentoo hosts using KVM as hypervisor, but the migration hangs. I tried both live or offline migration modes without success. Details below. Anyone has an idea of what could be wrong with my setup? The migration is the only thing not working. Host A (initially running the VM) ================================= # uname -a Linux pion