similar to: v1.1.rc10 released

This is now complete and soon the new packages will be merged into Fedora Rawhide: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2e0b2d6395 A few non-critical packages failed to build, and I will look at these later unless someone gets around to it before me. The failures are listed at the end. Notable changes: - Release notes: https://ocaml.org/releases/4.09.0.html - ocaml-camlp4

v3 adds libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-core too as a Recommends. Dan, there is a scratch build ongoing here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40377285 Rich.

Hi, I'm announcing two new releases of opus, along with the first release of the new libopusenc library. First for opus, we just fixed a bad bug in the surround encoding code that would cause very bad quality on signals beyond a certain amplitude. Thanks to Franziska Trojahn and others from HfT Leipzig for finding this issue through their listening test[1] (the quality of the two bad files

Docker 1.10.2 has just been built for virt7-docker-common-candidate https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78901 Please give it a shot and lemme know if I can proceed with releasing it. Thanks, -- Lokesh Freenode: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ > I'm updating the Fedora packaging of LLVM, and with the 02/20 prerelease it fails to build on ppc64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1148023 make[1]: Entering directory

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:43:32PM -0500, Jason Brooks wrote: > I'm getting this dep error trying to install this: > > Error: Package: 1:docker-1.10.2-5.git0f5ac89.el7.x86_64 (virt7-docker-common-candidate) > Requires: selinux-policy >= 3.13.1-114 > Removing: selinux-policy-3.13.1-60.el7.noarch (@anaconda) > selinux-policy =

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:18:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:16:28PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:14:19PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > > I gave this series a spin, along a custom QEMU, and `supermin` from Git, > > > for my `libguestfs-test-tool` itself fails with: > > > > > >

Hi Eric, I wonder if you have any thoughts about this build failure in tests/test-nozero.sh? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48259627 log: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9762/48259762/build.log The error is “nozero6.img was trimmed by mistake”. I added “set -x” to the script earlier today so we can see exactly what's wrong, and it is that: ++ stat

Hi, i have 2 dovecot imap server running on solaris 10 The primary server with dovecot 1.0.alpha4 is running with best performance on Sun Sparc E4k5 with 8x 450MHz The secondary with rc10 has ugly performanceproblems on Sun E450 wth 4x 450MHz. Every new imap process takes permanent 25% cpu usage List the folder and fetch message are both slowy! Both servers are configred with ldap backend

Hi folks, I've found ecryptfs module into kernel-plus, but ecryptfs-utils is missing: [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# uname -r 3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.centos.plus.x86_64 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# lsmod | grep ecryptfs ecryptfs 85424 0 [root at centos7 ecryptfs-utils-108]# yum -q repolist id del repositorio nombre del repositorio

Updated my R install on my GNU/Linux boxes (running CentOS 6.8) from 3.2.x -> 3.3.0, using latest from epel (i.e., not compiling from source), and while said upgrade seemed to go fine, am now (post-upgrade) having all sorts of problems with getting some (but not all) packages to compile (either during an initial install attempt, or upgrade to existing packages). For example, if I try to

Hi, On the weekend I tried to upgrade from RC7 to RC10. Clearly, I have to change some things before I can do this. What does it take to get to RC10? As is, my mail client got an error trying to list messages in /INBOX (via IMAP) and the mail.err log shows the following messages: Oct 29 10:27:32 siona dovecot: IMAP(archangel): open(/var/mail/archangel/inbox, O_CREAT) failed: Not a

Hello, I'm updating Fedora's LLVM to the latest 2.6 prerelease, and experiencing test failures on ppc. On x86_64 and x86_32 all tests pass as expected. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1660661 (see root.log to see what packages are installed for the build, and build.log for the build log -- 'make check' is called towards the end. Thanks, -- Michel Alexandre

I am at loss here R-data.table fails to rebuild, the failure happens in the tests where 3 are failing. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46195243 I will continue with the rebuild and let this case to look later or if anyone could help I would appreciate. :-) Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio

I'm pleased to announce the next release of hivex, a library and some tools for reading and writing Windows Registry hive files. Man page: http://libguestfs.org/hivex.3.html Source: http://libguestfs.org/download/hivex/ Git repo: http://git.annexia.org/?p=hivex.git;a=summary Fedora pkg: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3267857 This release mainly contains bug fixes.

I just installed a limited test of RC10 last night. So far, all is great except for errors being logged for one user (out of about 150 users total). This one user has not yet complained or anything, but the log file has repeated entries of the following format for him (host and username changed to protect the guilty/innocent): Oct 24 06:13:02 mail dovecot: IMAP(username): file

Hi Peter, The latest commit on master should solve the issue: https://git.xiph.org/?p=opus.git;a=commitdiff;h=4507637cc Let me know if it doesn't. Cheers, Jean-Marc On 25/05/17 07:40 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi Jean-Marc, > >> I'm announcing two new releases of opus, along with the first release of >> the new libopusenc library. >> >> First for opus,

I don't recall if I mentioned this on the list, but when you are configured with mbox format, and a user has no Dovecot index files yet, and the config is such that mbox_min_index_size is set to non-zero, non-default (128 in my test case), dovecot deliver fails. Commenting out "mbox_min_index_size" fixed the problem, and the indexes then get created. This problems exists in RC10 --

I just upgraded our test server from rc6 to rc10... ISSUE #1 I noticed that we no longer are getting two "From_" lines. However, the one that was good (had the original sender e-mail address) is now gone. The one with "dovecot.deliver" remains. I attempted to add "-d test" to the mailbox_command line in main.cf as follows: mailbox_command =

(Background: Relatively new to dovecot; looking to do transparent replacement of long-established UW-IMAP on cluster of Linux boxes which NFS-mount a shared "/var/spool/mail".) With rc8, where I had already increased "login_max_processes_count" from default 128 to 1024, we had still hit the issue of too many logins crashing dovecot, so that trial had only lasted a couple of