similar to: Problem joining windows clients to Samba AD

On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:46:05 +0200 L?o via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I come to you after several days of research about my problem: I > cannot make windows clients join my Samba AD domain anymore. > > My domain is built with two Samba AD DCs, dc1 and dc2, that are both > debian 12.6 up to date and use the debian samba packages >

Hello Rowland, Here it is: smb.conf: --- [global] dns forwarder = 9.9.9.9 netbios name = DC1 realm = AD.EXAMPLE.COM server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = AD idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes min protocol = SMB2 ntlm auth = mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only restrict anonymous = 2 disable netbios = yes smb ports = 445 printcap name = /dev/null load printers = no disable spoolss = yes

Hello all, I have a client which has a windows XP which cannot join the domain. Other computes are joined and working normally. I have raised the log level to 8 but I don't see (or I am unable to see) any error. In Windows XP I receive a 'Internal error' and I have a 'Unable to bind to DS' in windows NetSetup.log. I have no idea of what is going on. Can someone give me

I'm new to AD and Samba but we have been running 1 Samba AD DC on our network for a year now, without trouble. We have 2 sites, separated by a street and linked together with a site to site L2 VPN (EoIP on MikroTik). DC1 on site 1 (the currently running) and we are trying to run a 2nd DC (DC2 and DC4) on the 2nd site. idmap.ldb and sysvol are synchronized, `samba-tool drs showrepl` shows

Hi folks, We have a domain controller running Samba 3.4.5 that is backed onto an OpenLDAP datastore. The domain has no trouble joining Windows XP clients, but we've got a couple of Windows 7 / Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard that we can't join to the domain. The registry changes suggested in http://wiki.samba.org/index.php?title=Windows7&oldid=4766 have been applied, and a UNIX

hi all having some issues connecting a windows 2008 server to a samba pdc. debug/netsetup is telling me this: 02/12/2010 16:10:54:468 NetpDoDomainJoin 02/12/2010 16:10:54:468 NetpMachineValidToJoin: 'SS-WIN-RDS' 02/12/2010 16:10:54:468 OS Version: 6.1 02/12/2010 16:10:54:468 Build number: 7600 (7600.win7_rtm.090713-1255) 02/12/2010 16:10:54:468 SKU: Windows

Hi, I've been using Samba for years as a domain controller without issue, but this has stumped me. I've set up Windows Vista Enterprise SP1 on a Virtual PC. Samba is running on a Gentoo Linux box as version 3.3.3. I can access shares without issue, but I can't get the machine to join the domain. When it tries it shows "The parameter is incorrect". Delving into

I have been going through all the Wikis and various Google searches to try to solve my problem, all to no avail. I can mount a Samba share, but whenever I try to login using a domain account, I receive an error about "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed." What I have done so far, all to no avail. - Upgraded from Samba 3.4.2 to Samba 3.4.4

Hey, I need some help. I want to obtain a cross validation for a regression model (binary response) but I got an error with CVbinary. Well I did this: fit <- lm(resp ~ PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5 + PC6 + PC7 + PC8 + PC9+PC10+PC11+PC12+PC13+PC14+PC15+PC16+PC17+PC18+PC19+PC20+PC21+PC22+PC23+PC24+PC25+PC26+PC27+PC28, data = dexp.cp, family=binomial()) CVbinary(fit) Error in sample(nfolds, m,

Hi, I saved as a matrix a summary of a PCA analysis and I've used barplot to plot the PCA variances. I would like to print on the same graphic the values of my matrix m1 - in other words the summary of my PCA analysis. I can do it very painstaking with text for each row and make sure that everything aligns and so on but i wonder if there is a better method than that. My summary follows:

Following from the R-help thread of March 22 on "Memory usage in prcomp", I've started looking into adding an optional 'rank.' argument to prcomp allowing to more efficiently get only a few PCs instead of the full p PCs, say when p = 1000 and you know you only want 5 PCs. (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2016-March/437228.html As it was mentioned, we already

I agree with Kasper, this is a 'big' issue. Does your method of taking only n PCs reduce the load on memory? The new addition to the summary looks like a good idea, but Proportion of Variance as you describe it may be confusing to new users. Am I correct in saying Proportion of variance describes the amount of variance with respect to the number of components the user chooses to show? So

Hi, two days ago my functioning samba/ldap server stopped working. I *think* the problem is somehow related to the fact i transfered everything to a new server, but that was two months ago. Trouble started yesterday morning after a power-outage. Configuration: ubuntu 8.04, with a standard samba, ldap and smbldap-tools installed via apt-get. When users tried to login, they got a message "a

Hi! I have problem making ext3 FS on new disk. When I run mke2fs, it stops and gives me: "File size limit exceeded". Is this known issue? I'm running linux-2.4.10 with ext3 patch, e2fsprogs-1.25 freshly compiled. Cheers, Vita Appended are outputs of following programs: bash /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux /sbin/mke2fs -m0 -v -j /dev/sdb1 fdisk -l /dev/sdb strace

> On 25 Mar 2016, at 10:41 am, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > As I see it, the display showing the first p << n PCs adding up to 100% of the variance is plainly wrong. > > I suspect it comes about via a mental short-circuit: If we try to control p using a tolerance, then that amounts to saying that the remaining PCs are effectively zero-variance, but

Hi, are there any common causes for a windows machines failure to find a samba domain controller? im trying to join a windows 2008 server to a samba[3.4.0] PDC and debug/netsetup says "failed to find a DC in the specified domain". cheers

Hello, since a few days the computer in a branch office the computer take five and more minutes to load the user profile. In the user's samba log I found many lines of the type: [2011/08/17 12:36:09, 0] smbd/service.c:1188(make_connection) tonon-pc11 (::ffff:192.168.10.11) couldn't find service odb$ We don't have a service ODB defined on our samba server and never had. Is

Martin, I fully agree. This becomes an issue when you have big matrices. (Note that there are awesome methods for actually only computing a small number of PCs (unlike your code which uses svn which gets all of them); these are available in various CRAN packages). Best, Kasper On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch > wrote: > Following from

I've got a share where I needed the permissions to be 770 and I think an Apple Mac computer is connecting to a Samba share and changing the permissions each day. At the end of the day, I'll set permissions to: root at backblaze000002:/share1/QuinceCt/.TemporaryItems# ls -la total 12 drwxrwx--- 3 jlehmanjr qcbbwritetoquincectshare 16 Nov 15 14:57 . drwxrwx--- 9 jlehmanjr

As I see it, the display showing the first p << n PCs adding up to 100% of the variance is plainly wrong. I suspect it comes about via a mental short-circuit: If we try to control p using a tolerance, then that amounts to saying that the remaining PCs are effectively zero-variance, but that is (usually) not the intention at all. The common case is that the remainder terms have a roughly