similar to: GlusterFS

Hello, can dsync convert from compressed mbox to compressed mdbox format? When I use compressed mbox files, either with gzip or with bzip2, I can read the mails as usual, but I find the following errors in dovecots log file: imap(userxy): Error: nfs_flush_fcntl: fcntl(/home/hrz/userxy/Mail/mymbox.gz, F_RDLCK) failed: Bad file number imap(userxy): Error: nfs_flush_fcntl:

Hi there, I've been seeing this error in our logs quite frequently on our nfs storage (v3): 2008-11-10T13:24:26+00:00 mail8 dovecot: IMAP(XXX at YYY.com): nfs_flush_fcntl: fcntl(/var/spool/mail/XXX/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache, F_RDLCK) failed: No locks available Which is because we don't run lockd on our servers. Why is dovecot trying to use fcntl() ? I explicitly set it to use dotlocks

Hi, we recently upgraded dovecot from 1.0.5 to 1.1.3+latest patches. After the upgrade I saw some errors in the logs and I'm not sure whether they're a cause for concern. Our setup is 2 servers running openSUSE 11.0 and a NetApp Filer as storage backend. Following is the config: protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default):

Hello, after migrating from self-compiled Dovecot 2.3.3 to Dovecot 2.3.8 from the repository (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic" packages) I have issues with the submission service. If I send an email, it will not be forwarded and I get the following error message: Oct 11 09:29:01 srv2 dovecot: submission(hativ at example.com)<15819><XFnL eJ2U0rgqAoEMwMAIoDQqhHgB7k+O>: Panic: file

Hi to all, i migrate an imap server from courier-imap to dovecot 1.1.13. After the migration i have often this error in imap communication: * NO Mailbox is locked, will abort in 122 seconds * NO Mailbox is locked, will abort in 92 seconds * NO Mailbox is locked, will abort in 62 seconds * NO Mailbox is locked, will abort in 32 seconds I use maildir and all data are in nfs server. My dovecot

Hi Timo, ok, I have a large 2.07 NFS setup, and I have been monitoring error messages to make sure I catch things, and I've come across a lot of messages that come in pairs and look like this : Dec 01 17:48:35 lda(paul at xxxxxx.com): Error: write(/home/mailboxes/data/301/paul at xxxxxx.com/Maildir/tmp/1291254514.M620308P83269.mta2.scaledsystems.com) failed: Permission denied Dec 01

Hi, It seems that after I upgraded to 1.1beta1 it takes a few seconds first time I access a folder and i get this error : fcntl(/mail2/home/jon/.Maildir/.INBOX.Pren/dovecot.index.cache, F_RDLCK) failed: Bad file descriptor. No errors after that and it works fine. is this expected. Is it ok to continue using this? Best regards - Jon

Hello, I'm using samba 4.7.3 to run an AD and I'm currently having issues with the MIT kerberos because it stops some time after starting (and apparently working correctly) without logging nothing out of the ordinary. My setup has 2 DC: one in an ubuntu 12.04 with version 4.1.9 (which we're migrating from) and the one I mentioned in CentOS 7 (which will be the only DC in the future).

Hi, I'm having problems in a second domain controller machine. Every time a restart samba, few time after a samba process starts using almost 100% cpu. It's a Centos 6.5 x86_64 with the following: sernet-samba-libsmbclient0-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-ad-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-build-key-1.1-4.noarch sernet-samba-libs-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-client-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64

Hi, Yes, I already thought about it. I have the sernet repo installed.. Is possible to yum update and jump from 4.1.6 to 4.1.14 directly, without problems or should I follow some kind of procedure to avoid future problems? Regards, Bruno Andrade. On 12/29/2014 01:46 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/12/14 12:02, Bruno Andrade wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> Sorry, I forgot to

Hi again, Sorry, I forgot to include the fd used... 13 -> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=EXAMPLE,DC=COM.ldb 16 -> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/metadata.tdb the others refers to /var/run/samba/winbindd/pipe Regards, Bruno Andrade. On 12/29/2014 11:56 AM, Bruno Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > Here is some output of "strace -ff -p" to the process using ~100% CPU >

Hello, I've come across a curious issue with Samba 3.6.10. When running 'emacs' version GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.0.6002) of 2011-03-10 on 3249CTO on Windows Server 2008 SP2 x64 and issuing a file "revert" of one sort or another against a Samba-served file, the 'smbd' process leaks two or three handles. Eventually, when 16k handles are open, this causes

Hello Aki, I have this problem just with 2.3.8, my self-compiled 2.3.3 works fine. I have previously tried to update from 2.3.3 to higher versions (possibly 2.3.5 or so), but always had this error, which is why I am always back to 2.3.3. Configuration is exactly the same. Here my output from "doveconf -n": # 2.3.8 (9df20d2db): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf# Pigeonhole version 0.5.8

Hi! I need some help. We use samba4 as AD, and now when clients connect to server, samba process stuck at 100% cpu. samba Version: 4.3.4 Release: 13.el6 top: 3777 root 20 0 131m 46m 28m R 99.7 0.3 219:20.53 /usr/local/samba4//sbin/samba -D 24541 csertam 20 0 49260 11m 9048 S 25.1 0.1 0:01.56 smbd -D 7080 squid 20 0 926m 908m 6428 S 9.9 6.2 11:43.50

Hi everybody ! I am encountering performance problem on my bridgehead DC. I have 19 DC (Debian Stretch / Samba 4.6.7 from Tranquil.it repo) and they all synchronized on a main bridgehead DC. This performance problem first appears when the bridgehead DC was on Debian Jessie and kernel was updated with meltdown/spectre patch from Debian (3.16.51-3+deb8u1) I added "nopti" option to grub

Did you install it from binary packages ? compiled from source ? Post your smb.conf here. ----- Original Message ----- From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 1:01:10 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] samba process use 100% cpu Anybody? 2017. 05. 02. 10:48 keltezéssel, Papp Bence via samba írta: > Hi!

On 4/21/2016 12:01, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 21 Apr 2016, at 19:51, Knute Johnson <dovecot at knutejohnson.com> wrote: >> On 4/21/2016 04:33, Aropalo Tommi wrote: >>>> I'm trying to set up replication between two servers and I've hit a >>>> snag. I have two users and am using mbox files. If anybody has a >>>> sample config file for a

Hello, I upgraded dovecot to 1.1.2 this weekend and i get those errors: grep dovecot /var/log/net/maillog |grep Panic | cut -d " " -f 11-100| sort | uniq -c | sort -rn 7547 file index-sync.c: line 39: assertion failed: (seq_range_exists(&ibox->recent_flags, uid)) 89 file index-mail.c: line 1091: assertion failed: (! mail->data.destroying_stream) 18 file

We have a Linux file server for a set of computer science and engineering labs where each lab contains machines running Mac OS X, Ubuntu Linux, or some incarnation of Windows. At times the these machines become almost unusable and I think I have narrowed the problem to smbd processes soaking up all the CPU on the server. Running 'top' on the server reveals a dozen or so entries like

Hi, This (hopefully!) might be a case of user error, as I'm new to dovecot... Alternatively it might be some confusion in an index, since I've been mucking about trying different things in my configuration files and had frequent crashes. I'm trying to sync 2 (LAN) hosts, ideally to have full automatic replication happening. They both have hybrid mbox INBOX and maildir++ folders,