similar to: Creating a large pre-allocated qemu-img raw image takes too long and fails on fuse

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1

Hi, I hope someone can help me, I cannot seem to get a system's ethernet interface to correctly work in promiscuous mode... I have a Centos 6.4 system with 2 bnx2 interfaces on it. I have set up eth1 in promiscuous mode and am sending traffic to it using the port mirroring configuration on a Nortel 3510-24T switch. The switch reports that it is sending a fair amount of traffic to the

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation.

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

I've been doing some testing between Windows 2000 Pro (SP4) and Windows 2000 Server (no SP and SP4) -- specifcally testing file transfers from a Samba 2.2.8a server. Samba server: P4/2.2GHz, ServerWorks chipset, SCSI UW2 disk subsystem (Bonnie++ tested to 35MB/sec), 3Com (acenic) gigabit ethernet Win2kPro: P3/700, 3Com Vortex 100mbit network card Win2kServer: P3/800, 3Com Vortex 100mbit

hi all, I hope you can help me with a strange quota/nfs/XFS behavior... I'm using Centos 5.6 on both a nfs server and client. Both are 64-bit, and using a recent kernel: NFS server: Linux fs2.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux NFS client: Linux nx8.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------

On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:14:03AM +0530, Jatin Davey wrote: > Hi All > > I was reading through this: > > http://kashyapc.com/2011/12/02/little-more-disk-io-perf-improvement-with-fallocateing-a-qcow2-disk/ In my testing, the above method gives near-raw performance as it preallocated all the space ahead of time. The above test can now be done in a single command -- see option (3)

Hi all, I'm trying to compile rsync from the git sources (rev 8bcd6a4afff3cb8197d5589ec4fdf9fe153f53de) the configuration step went without any reported problems so I ran the make utility to compile the code base. The following error was almost immediately returned after running make: ./rsync.h:669:26: fatal error: linux/falloc.h: No such file or directory The reported line resides in

On 07/30/2018 01:04 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: > On RHEL 7.5 we need to include <linux/falloc.h> for FALLOC_FL_* macros. Rather, on any Linux system that pre-dates glibc 2.18, where the flags were finally supported directly in <fcntl.h> > Without the macros, fallocate is never used and we fall back to manual > zeroing. > > +++ b/plugins/file/file.c > @@ -42,6 +42,10

On 07/29/2018 07:04 AM, Nir Soffer wrote: > If we may not trim, we tried ZERO_RANGE, but this is not well supported > yet, for example it is not available on NFS 4.2. ZERO_RANGE and > PUNCH_HOLE are supported now on block devices, but not on RHRL 7, so we > fallback to slow manual zeroing there. > > Change the logic to support block devices on RHEL 7, and file systems > that

Hi, I have a program which needs to call some code manually allocated in memory. The code is first prepared and all of its functions/variables are updated with the right address, then its init function is called through a simple __fastcall in C. It works very well under windows, but if i try to run it under wine it crashes when it calls this init function, with the following error:

I starting seeing this error quite frequently the past couple of days: $ rake routes ruby(38294,0x7fff70ee6ca0) malloc: *** error for object 0x100000000: pointer being freed was not allocated *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug Abort trap Rails server crashes, some rake tasks crash, but not consistently. I have: - removed ruby 1.9.2-p180 and reinstalled (via rvm) - delete gemset

Hello list, sorry for my bad english anyway. if my message is delirium, just ignore this message. My question: When using mixed blocks, metadata and data chunks has be merge, but we have (when using mixed) speed penalty. how many penalty will be have if we using mixed? Kernel 3.11-rc7, Ubuntu 13.10 x64 my simple test: #Mixed sudo mkfs.btrfs -f -M /dev/sdb #sdb old seagate hdd 80G sudo mount

When I create a new VPS, I choose not to Allocated Disk space for the file-size. Now I need to make my VPS to allocated the file-space, is it possible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20100405/f8b10d03/attachment-0006.html>

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 Martin d'Anjou <point14 at magma.ca> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |point14 at magma.ca --- Comment #13 from Martin d'Anjou <point14 at magma.ca> 2008-12-13

the memory which is allocated by matchpathcon should be freed after it is useless Signed-off-by: Roy Li <rongqing.li at windriver.com> --- openbsd-compat/port-linux.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/openbsd-compat/port-linux.c +++ b/openbsd-compat/port-linux.c @@ -217,8 +217,10 @@ ssh_selinux_setfscreatecon(const char *p setfscreatecon(NULL);

Hi all, I have a bunch of new registers set up in X86RegisterInfo.td, the important part being def PR128 : RegisterClass<"X86", [i128], 128, (sequence "POI%u", 0, 7)>; def VR128 : RegisterClass<"X86", [v4f32, v2f64, v16i8, v8i16, v4i32, v2i64], 128, (add PR128, FR32)>; I have an entry in