similar to: procmail -> deliver: file too large

Gang, ???? I run several KVM host machines.? Due to updates, maintenance, and unexpected reboots sometime host machines are restarted.? I can easily envision a scenario where HostX needs some critical packages updated or is acting up.? I migrate guest0, guest1, guest2 etc. from HostX to HostY.? Then, in either a planned (i.e. scheduled maintenance) or unplanned (i.e. unplanned reboot) event

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Giving up on the sieve plugin and switching to procmail. I found the following link: http://wiki.dovecot.org/procmail This site doesn't saying anything about needing to modify the procmail source code like here: http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2006-July/014656.html Thos shows how to make procmail work with dovecot deliver program. So

Hi all. I'm relatively new to Dovecot, but I really like what I'm seeing so far. I have one problem that I was hoping you could help me with though. I use Postfix for my mail server, then pass that on to procmail for filtering, and finally to deliver to put the mail in the appropriate Maildir folder. However, this isn't working. Postfix passes the mail to procmail correctly, but

Hi, I have site w. around 7000 users, most of which have some procmail rules (theres even .procmailrc in /etc/skel with rule to put spam into spam folder). Afaik dovecot's deliver doesnt understand procmail rules, so i'd like to ask if its possible to configure procmail so it saves mail using deliver, without modifying users .procmailrc Thanks for any pointers, Vaclav Hula

Hi there, I use dovecot-1.1-rc4, got imap, imaps, pop3 & pop3s working fine with the mbox format. I use sendmail-8.14.2 as an MTA, sendmail uses procmail as an LDA. I migrated to maildir format now, and pipe all my mail to deliver right now to be able to make use of the indexing etc... Problem is I run into some errors : #My .procmailrc PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin

hi together, procmail provides an error by delivery. procmail: Executing "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver,Maildir" procmail: Error while writing to "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver" procmail: Program failure (64) of "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver" procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver Maildir" From

I came up with this trick That is Since my previous mail server had a bunch of complex procmail recipies and I am not sure that I can turn them into sieve scripts I am calling dovecot deliver to drop mail in it's final $DEFAULT destination. :0 | /some/path/dovecot/deliver in order to update the index, control files etc upon delivery time. So far in my "tests" it works. But I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, first of all, please reply private as I am not subscribed to the list. But if this question takes to much traffic I can subscribe. My problem is that I have to use procmail (as it can call external programs) which finally calls deliver. My main rules are sieve and they work find except that I cannot use subaddress matching in envelope to (not

Hello! Currently I'm trying to integrate dovecot's deliver program into procmail. So basically I'd write a patch for procmail to deliver not directly into the mbox file but delivering with the dovecot deliver program. Do you think this is a good concept? For testing I use the commands discussed below. Currently I'm having a problem that deliver doesn't recognize the

Hi list, I understand that dovecot's deliver does a little more than deliver: it also updates the dovecot metadata stored with each Maildir. Thus, if I use deliver as opposed to procmail's internal Maildir delivery, it seems that the IMAP server later has less work to do since the metadata is can use are up to date. Doing this, however, incurs an extra process for each mail delivered. I

(Using dovecot 1.0 RC7 on Fedora Core 5) <scene set> Hitherto we have used UW-IMAP on a "farm" of Linux machines mounting NFS from a NetApp. (The UW-IMAP author doesn't like use of NFS, but with careful use of NFS mount arguments ('noac,actimeo=0' etc.) and trying to ensure that all activity for a given user takes place within one machine in the farm, we seem to

Hi all, I'm attempting to migrate some files off a samba server onto a network appliance server. Currently we're in a win2k domain with AD, the samba server is 3.0.0 running on redhat 9. The samba is a member of the Win2k domain. What I'm attempting to do is migrate some files from the samba server to a network appliance, and for areas which are going to be used only by windows

Hi to all out there, i know this is not the right mailinglist for this issue, but i?m hoping to get maybe here an answer to my problem. i have succesfully migrated 12.000 mailboxes on a debaian with washington imap to maildir on sles10 with dovecot. although i had some post-converting work to do, i can say that almost everything went fine. but there is one problem with my LDA. When postfix is

Hi all. I have an old windows VM with an oldish cygwin that I use for the regression tests. Investigating one of the test failures, I see that it's for UsePrivilegeSeparation=sandbox, and it seems to be because setrlimit(RLIMIT_FSIZE, ...) is not supported. IMO, this isn't a big loss, since the most useful thing in the rlimit "sandbox" is the descriptor limits. Can anyone see

Hi I've just compiled dovecot under Slitaz, but I can't get it to run... It always die with this message in log : 2010-05-06 12:35:12 dovecot: Info: Dovecot v1.2.11 starting up 2010-05-06 12:35:12 dovecot: Fatal: setrlimit(RLIMIT_DATA, 256): Operation not permitted 2010-05-06 12:35:12 dovecot: Error: child 1455 (auth) returned error 89 (Fatal failure) 2010-05-06 12:35:12 dovecot: Fatal:

> execv(argv[0]) is a canonical way to restart the > process, it's sad that the emulator interferes with that. We have the option to emulate the instruction set or emulate the OS. The former is lighter weight and easy to configure. The downside is that system calls route to the host system. That can be useful if, for example, the executable invokes llvm-symbolizer. While

I fixed the issue with Dovecot not starting on macOS Ventura by adding this to 10-master.conf: service log { vsz_limit = 0 } But now when I try to login via Imap on port 143 I get the same error for imap-login: Feb 20 15:55:41 imap-login: Error: Feb 20 15:55:41 service(imap-login): Fatal: setrlimit(RLIMIT_DATA, 268435456): Invalid argument Feb 20 15:55:41 imap-login: Fatal: master:

Hi Aaaron, On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 19:50 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > In order to get Cygwin working there is a need to add a > HAVE_RLIMIT_RSS and associated logic. This was just recently added. Does cygwin even have getrlimit and setrlimit? IIRC correctly, it doesn't. So, perhaps these functions need to be written differently for Cygwin. What's the equivalent win32 call? If cygwin

> Why does fork-exec for llvm-symbolizer work, but simple exec(self) does not? Because the llvm-symbolizer the runtime finds is built for the host architecture. This is weird, yes, but once we integrate the symbolizer, it goes away. > Could we write a ulimit-like utility that would do setrlimit and then > exec the specified binary > %run %ulimit -s 8192 %t? I like that idea. How

Hi, The systrace and rlimit sandboxes have been committed and will be in snapshots dated 20110623 and later. This diff adds support for pre-auth privsep sandboxing using the OS X sandbox_init(3) service. It's a bit disappointing that the OS X developers chose such as namespace-polluting header and function names "sandbox.h", "sandbox_init()", etc. It already forced me to