similar to: rejecting mail due to quota exceeded

Hi list, > Jul 17 12:15:10 seamus dovecot: IMAP(someone at somehost.org): block_alloc(): Out of memory > Jul 17 12:15:10 seamus dovecot: child 26181 (imap) returned error 83 (Out of memory) I found those two entries in the logs this morning. The system has ample free memory. What's going on? -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "i wish i hadn't slept

Hi, I am using the Debian dovecot packages and the deliver LDA from postfix, all version 1.0.beta8. My problem is with quota support, I am using Maildirs. The relevant configuration stuff is included at the bottom of this email. Quota support seems to work with IMAP. However, even when IMAP complains about an account being over quota, the deliver LDA still happily writes new mail to the (correct)

Hello, I am trying to test-call my own asterisk server to see if I can receive SIP calls properly. I use a softphone to call the SIP address, and because twinkle doesn't support SRV records, I go via a proxy. When the call comes in, asterisk says: handle_request_invite: Sending fake auth rejection for user "martin f. krafft" <sip:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx at

Hey folks, I am trying to get an E65 to connect to asterisk, and I would really appreciate a second set of eyes. The SIP dialog completes fine, but the phone subsequently says "Registration failed". I am in a network that has what seems to be a SIP-capable NAT gateway, but the asterisk is configured nat=yes anyway. Using a softphone (twinkle), I can connect just fine, SIP and RTP work.

Dear list, I am running dovecot 1.2.15 on a Debian server. One user reports continuous problems synchronising her mailbox via IMAP (offlineimap, via SSH tunnel or SSL socket). It seems that she has a large, locally-created message, but the uplink bandwidth seems to be not enough to push it before dovecot times out the APPEND command. The error/exception happens inside offlineimap's Python

Dear list, I am experimenting with a new mail handling setup and it involves a single IMAP folder with just under 70'000 messages. When OfflineIMAP connects to the server, the imap process starts to eat up a lot of memory: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 15607 madduck 35 19 283m 244m 239m D 16.9 49.3 0:09.96 imap On the contrary, when

Hello, I'm tasked with establishing a persistent SSH connection across a very unreliable link, for a remote port forward (always port 2217). I figured I'd use ServerAliveInterval to make sure that the ssh(1) process dies when the connection appears down, and I use systemd to restart it in this case. This works fine. What does not work fine, however, is the server-side. If the connection

Hey folks, I can park a call with #70 after enabling that feature in features.conf. However, once I retrieve the call from the parking lot, #70 cannot be used to park it again. Worse yet, none of the keys defined in the featuremap work anymore, include blindxfer or automon. Any ideas what may be the problem? -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "man sagt nicht

I am a bit at a loss here with Sieve (pigeonhole) and the spamtest extension. I am using Dovecot 2.1.7 (backported to Debian squeeze), which comes with Pigeonhole 0.3.0. Messages are scanned with SpamAssassin, which adds a header like X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=84.6 required=5.0 tests=? and so I configured spamtest in conf.d/90-plugin.conf like so: sieve_spamtest_status_type = score

also sprach Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> [2014-12-23 07:50 +0100]: > If it's not "in the local network", then it shouldn't get the > subdomain of the internal network, and you've got a DNS "views" or > DHCP configuration issue. While the machine is not at the office, other machines can resolve fishbowl.office to a valid IP? that's the

Hi list, I understand that dovecot's deliver does a little more than deliver: it also updates the dovecot metadata stored with each Maildir. Thus, if I use deliver as opposed to procmail's internal Maildir delivery, it seems that the IMAP server later has less work to do since the metadata is can use are up to date. Doing this, however, incurs an extra process for each mail delivered. I

also sprach Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> [2014-12-22 14:43 +0100]: > The problem, I think, isn't that you have an entry in all three. It's > that you have a *shortened* hostname that is identical in all 3 DNS > domains. If your DNS admins have gracefully set the local environments > to each be on their own subdomain, and that subdomain is *first* in > DHCP

# dovecot-related content below, this one for debian bug tracking # system: retitle 435959 Please support RFC4315 UIDPLUS extension in APPEND reply severity 435959 wishlist thanks [please keep 435959 at bugs.debian.org on Cc.] Hi there, I am working on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435959, which is a performance problem that offlineimap has on large mailboxes. We think that a

Hi guys, now that violations.d/logcheck is empty, violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* are useless and many messages that were previously elevated and filtered there now turn up as system events. Thus, I went ahead and merged violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* into ignore.d.*/* in the viol-merge branch. http://git.debian.org/?p=logcheck/logcheck.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/viol-merge Unless I hear

Hi there, I found that with an IMAP command like <unique-leader> STORE 1 +FLAGS (testflag) I can set arbitrary flags on mails through the dovecot IMAP daemon. This rules. Now I wonder, however, how I can remove those flags, which become properties of the folder, really. For instance, after the above, SELECT on the containing folder gives: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen

Hi folks, According to the wiki,? it's considered a feature of Dovecot and its ability to support multiple authentication sources that "if the password doesn't match in the first database, it checks the next one". ?) http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/MultipleDatabases I think it's great that Dovecot allows auth sources to be stacked like this, but I am not sold on the

Dear list, we would really like to be able to "invite a third and fourth party" to our current one-on-one call. At the moment, we have to agree to dial into MeetMe 10 minutes later, then make calls to the third parties, and hope it all works out. I have found a couple of examples on the Internet for converting channels into conferences, but I could not get any of them working. Does

From the digest: On Aug 14, 2007, at 1:04 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: other messages cut out? > > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:03:58 +0200 > From: martin f krafft <madduck at madduck.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] use of deliver from procmail advisable? > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <20070814170358.GA17390 at

Hi folks, I was using the following featuremap: blindxfer => *1 disconnect => *9 atxfer => *2 parkcall => *7 automixmon => *0 and everything worked. Then the need arouse to use some features like automixmon during a conference, but MeetMet has the * key bound to the (admin) menu. Thus, in order to enable features like automon and transfers even during a conference, I

Hello list, we are using dovecot-lmtp for delivery to virtual users, and vmm[1] to manage them. 1. http://vmm.localdomain.org/ One nice feature of vmm is that every virtual user has their own UID/GID on the UNIX filesystem. There is no passwd entry, so no shell login, but each user effectively has a home directory and can run commands in isolation and with lowered privileges. This requires