similar to: Dovecot pop3 and SonicWall?

Hi all, I currently have an Asterisk test server behind a TZ170 Sonicwall firewall / NAT box, with several DIDs. I've found that inbound IAX2 calls don't work reliably (i.e., I get a busy tone) unless I enable "Use Consistent NAT" in the Sonicwall. This feature is poorly documented by Sonicwall, so I thought I'd pass it along. Has anyone else run into this, or figured

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:28:19 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 04.03.19 um 21:18 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > >> It shouldn't, you normally only have one gateway, it is by definition > >> the 'gateway' to the WAN & internet, so I would use the same one on all > >> your machines. > > > > The LAN host

Hi, I'm having an issue where some phones behind a sonicwall are auto-congesting. The status on "sip show peer" shows ping times anywhere from 80ms all the way up to 1100ms. PCs behind the same firewall have a ping time of about 30ms to the PBX itself. Does anyone know if the sonicwall is inserting delay into the SIP signaling path and lagging the OPTIONS messages for qualify?

Recently the small business I work at replaced an aging linksys wrt style router with a SonicWall one. Ever since this change I have issues with this node falling back to TCP constantly. TCP for me ends up performing very sub-par, and most of the time unworkable. For some reason too the connection usually ends up being routed through another node. I created a new tinc instance using TAP

Sonicwall now has "SIP transformations" check box in the Access section of the interface - does anyone know how to make sense of this function? Tech support is useless, and the help description is confusing. Using on office network to connect Grandstream and Cisco phones to asterisk PBX at remote location. I hate to use linksys or belkin, but they're (ironically) the only 2 that

Current dev cvs install on two systems. System A is behind a SonicWall firewall, and system B is on a registered IP address. (System B has multiple iax links that are fully functional to multiple locations.) System A is correctly registering with System B, with no special firewall rules. Should System B be able to take advantage of the "registration" to send iax/gsm calls to System A

Hello All: I have a situation where I have a Samba box (RH 7.3 w/samba 2.2.4) that I set up for a client. Another consultant came along and installed a VPN using SonicWalls between the main site and a remote site. So now they want the remote users to save files on my Samba box. No problem except that the remote users can't see my local workgroup or any of the local machines. Here's

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:31:07 +0000 From: Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >

I've searched the archives a bit and have not really come up with a good answer to my queries. I have * running on a RH9 box behind a LinkSys NAT box. I can talk with iConnectHere outbound just fine. I am trying to configure an inbound Xten softphone from outside. I have that user set as NAT in sip.conf (seems to help), but I still cannot establish a full session. I think the problem comes

I am running Samba 3.4.8 as a PDC on Solaris 10. I recently made this the WINS master- previously the BDC (Samba 3.0.37 on another Solaris 10 server.) I also use Sonicwall ipsec VPN for remote access (Windows XP clients.) The sonicwall client creates a virtual NIC on the client so that the client can have an IP address directly on the company LAN (ie. the same LAN as the samba

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:15:12 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >

Hi all I have a few Polycom 331's but after following allot of advice I can't get them to provision from a dhcp boot server. We have a sonicwall router in place. I can press setup and set the FTP boot server to my * box. From there th phones boot fine. But I cannot get them to autoprovision. I have tried dhcp option 66=ipaddres. 66=FTP://PlcmSpIp:PlcmSpIp at 192.168.1.1/ u ahve also

Hi, Sorry to bother, but I checked around and did not succed creating a bundle from six existing packages (which are checkable, installable, etc. individually). I carefully followed the procedure given in ch. 1.1.5 Package bundles. However, I am getting hoffmann at fluke:~/R/Sources >R CMD check cwhmisc * checking for working latex ... OK * using log directory

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:43:17 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:31:07 +0000 From: Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:18:36 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:57:16 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:43:17 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >

On Sat Jan 20 16:28:14 2024 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:44:18 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > After provisioning and testing my new DC offline, I now want to move > > it into production. This means changing IPs. > > > > DC FQDN: mail.hprs.local > >

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:15:12 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I have a rather strange and urgent problem. Last evening I installed > > a Sonicwall firewall between the Internet and office LAN. The only > > change that I know of for the LAN workstations was that the

Hi all, I have several locations, each connected by a Sonicwall VPN through PPPOE DSL, with Snom 360 phones. I've found that I have to tweak the Asterisk server MTU (inside one of the firewalls) to get everything to work "just right". Set the server MTU too low, and the Snom phones don't communicate correctly anymore. Too high and the phones work, but the server can't

So, assuming your Asterisk box is behind one firewall (Linksys/Tomato Software) and your Wireless SIP phone is behind another firewall (SonicWall 1260 Enhanced). Is there anything special that I have to do to the firewalls. I do have the Asterisk firewall configured to work (ports 5060 & 10001-20000). But I'm not sure about the other end. Do I need STUN at the SIP Phone end? Do I

Hi, sorry for this lengthy post. I am using R-2.0.0 on Unix, compiled. Overview: A) R CMD check: Unaccounted top-level text B) In which sections of *.Rd is LaTeX notation allowed, where *not*? C) Codoc mismatches and polyvalent parameters D) Successful R CMD INSTALL and R CMD build E) cp ../Rd.sty . is copy necessary? F) latex ./CWHstat-manual.tex runs into trouble When running >R CMD