similar to: Password scheme module thoughts?

Hi, all. About two and a half years ago, I wrote a hack to add an additional MD5-based password scheme to Dovecot, but I wrote it as a hack to src/auth/password_scheme.c since it was relatively easy to do, and I needed to get a machine running since the machine I was replacing, a Sun Ultra 5 running Post.Office, had dying hard drives. Now, I'm actually sitting down and adapting it as a

Hi, all. I managed to get my new password scheme routine written, but a couple of things: 1. The example module lacks an init routine. Since I used it as a model, my module also lacks one. As such, my newly-built module is seen but not registered. In the meantime, I moved the routines into password-scheme.c instead where I had access to all the MD5 routines already set up for me. 2.

Hi, all. I was curious how difficult it would be to add a new password scheme to Dovecot? I have to transplant mailboxes from one machine to another, the older machine running Post.Office from now-defunct Software.Com, which was bought by OpenWave, then discontinued. Apparently, Netscape's mailserver offering from the day also supports this scheme. There's code out there that was

Hello. I have been having trouble configuring the source code for the abovementioned. I have to use RSARef as I'm a resident of the USA, so I can avoid patent violation. The configure script fails to see the OpenSSL+RSAref mix on three different platforms, including the following: FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (Which has its own port, but I wanted to try it there to see if I could reliably reproduce

Hello all, I had gone through the wiki, but could not find any page about writing new plugins. Any pointers towards plugin api/docs will be very helpful. with warm regards, raj

> On August 1, 2016 at 4:38 PM aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > > > > > On August 1, 2016 at 3:45 PM Andreas Meyer <luckyfellow42 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > 2016-07-31 16:39 GMT+02:00 <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > > > > > > > > > On July 27, 2016 at 2:08 AM Andreas Meyer <luckyfellow42 at gmail.com> >

2016-07-31 16:39 GMT+02:00 <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > > > On July 27, 2016 at 2:08 AM Andreas Meyer <luckyfellow42 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I want to add a new password hashing scheme as plugin and provide it for > > the dovecot project, so that it will be included as optional plugin in > > future

Hi, I want to add a new password hashing scheme as plugin and provide it for the dovecot project, so that it will be included as optional plugin in future releases. Yet the plugin compiles fine and the .so file gets created. My approach is to call the functions password_scheme_register() and password_scheme_unregister() (src/auth/password-scheme.c) inside the plugin's _init() and _deinit()

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > >> It even recently included a POP server. What's the reasoning there? > >Someone wanted it so it'd be easy to run both POP3 and IMAP servers > >without having to configure them twice. I don't see any harm in it > >anyway, it took only few hours to write, it's optional and doesn't take >

I''ve created a couple of plugins for use with some internal projects here and stuck them in their own svn repos. Then I have other svn-stored projects I want to use the plugins with. Both the projects and the plugins are updated quite a bit. So I install the plugin from my project: script/plugin install http://<path_to_plugin_repo>/<plugin_name> Then later I commit some

Hi, all. I know that there's no official Dovecot 1.0-stable .deb, given Timo's recommendations. However, does anyone have even an "unofficial" deb of it for, say, Sarge? I want to use 1.0's ability to use both mbox and maildir; the latter is very helpful for dealing with mailing lists. Thanks in advance for any help. --Ian.

v3 posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/msg00200.html v4: - The first patch in the v3 series was just a trivial doc whitespace fix so I pushed it. - There's a new patch using the nbdkit-retry-filter. This is not actually upstream in nbdkit but we know enough about how it will work. - Rebased against master and reran the tests. Rich.

On 01/17/2018 02:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This returns the plugin name, which for plugins is the same as the > ordinary .name method (but for filters will be different). > --- Just as .name and .plugin_name can differ for filters, should we also have a way to report independent version numbers (via .version) for the filter, compared to the version of the underlying plugin (via

Hi, all. I have been playing with the notion of migrating some of my folders to maildir because it's a lot easier to manage that way from a reader standpoint. The big question I have is how do I maintain message ordering in each folder? When I use a mail program to do the migration from mbox to maildir, selecting "order received ascending", it works nicely, but one very small

This series (except the last one) changes virt-v2v to use nbdkit for several input modes: -i vmx -it vddk: No change in functionality, as this already uses nbdkit-vddk-plugin, but the code is refactored for the other modes to use. -i libvirtxml: Use nbdkit-curl-plugin instead of qemu curl. vCenter: Use nbdkit-curl-plugin instead of qemu curl. xen: Use nbdkit-ssh-plugin instead of qemu

v2 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/msg00115.html This also has links to earlier versions. v3: - The 01/11 patch in v2 included a bunch of unnecessary plus one necessary change to how input_password is passed around. I moved the necessary change into the final patch (implementing SSH password authentication) and dropped the rest. - The 01/11

Originally posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-April/thread.html#00054 https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-April/msg00076.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-April/msg00126.html This is a rebase on top of current master branch with no other changes. The first patch in the old series was pushed a while back, and the last "TEMPORARY"

The tests assume probe_filter returns true if the filter is available (and not the other way around). Signed-off-by: Tomáš Golembiovský <tgolembi@redhat.com> --- v2v/nbdkit.ml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/v2v/nbdkit.ml b/v2v/nbdkit.ml index 77d2a506..00122bec 100644 --- a/v2v/nbdkit.ml +++ b/v2v/nbdkit.ml @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ let common_create

These patches should be ready to go in now; I will also post my work-in-progress for enabling full parallel handling that depends on these, but with that series, I was still getting crashes or hangs with test-socket-activation (I think I've nailed all the crashes I've seen, but the hang is rather insidious; see my other email

This is built on top of the following patch series: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-April/msg00054.html Rich.