similar to: NSD 4.10.1rc2 pre-release

Am 23.07.24 um 17:28 schrieb Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users: > NSD 4.10.1rc2 pre-release is available: no compile time warnings while building on debian bookworm/x86_64 > @bilias implemented mutual TLS authentication for zone transfers. > Please consult the nsd.conf manual for details on the newly introduced > configuration options tls-auth-port and tls-auth-xfr-only. this is an nice

Hi Andreas, The suggestions I captured in GitHub issues. Thanks for sharing. Regarding whether notifies are still plain UDP. Yes, the config parser doesn't accept additional arguments to "notify" and judging by the xfrd code anything to do with notify is using UDP, so no TLS yet. I've added a GitHub issue for this too. Thanks for the suggestions. They make for nice

NSD 4.10.0rc1 is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 ad476e82eee5bdabc985e071cabe6a68263dd02eac6278ce2f81798b8c08f19f pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.0rc1.tar.gz.asc Version 4.10.0 integrates simdzone and drops the Flex+Bison zone parser. NSD used a Flex+Bison based zone parser since version 1.4.0. The parser served NSD well, but zones have

Hi, I'm new to NSD and would really appreciate if someone can point me to the right direction. I have like 8 NSD servers (secondary) serving around 30,000 zones. Zone updates are transferred from the primary DNS servers by AXFR/IXFR. The 8 NSD servers do not save the zones file on disk but are only held in memory. Therefore after NSD service is restarted zone transfer requests are being

Hi list, We are observing strange behavior of nsd v3.2.9 acting as slave DNS server. The environment is set up as follows: 0. We are using 172.16.0.0/16 subnet; 1. Primary Master server at 172.16.100.114; 2. Slave server at 172.16.100.115. The config file is in /etc/nsd-dns-slave.conf; 3. There may be also other Master servers im the given subnet. Now I want to permit DNS NOTIFY messages to

Hi, NSD 4.8.0rc1 pre-release is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.8.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 64f1da8f8163340f9d3b352ef8819e3c72c951fdd87cff55dc3b6a6b1ea27942 pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.8.0rc1.tar.gz.asc This release introduces PROXYv2 support and faster statistics gathering, removes the database option and fixes bugs. The proxy protocol support is an implementation

Dear all, NSD 4.11.0rc1 pre-release is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 7594d014199585c24f6593649bfc657078d411a3f09eb31192a35a7c031c028f pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz.asc Version 4.11.0rc1 sees various small features and bugfixes. One notable feature is that configuration can be reloaded and evaluated on SIGHUP, when

Hi Jean Claude, The message is printed when the bind operation failed. Why that happens is hard to say, I'd need more information for that. As the message does not say: address already in use (or similar), I'm guessing the address is not configured? Best regards, Jeroen On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 18:03 +0200, HAKIZIMANA Jean Claude via nsd-users wrote: > Dear nsd Users, > kindly can

>Regarding whether notifies are still plain UDP. Yes, the config parser >doesn't accept additional arguments to "notify" and judging by the xfrd >code anything to do with notify is using UDP, so no TLS yet. Is there currently or will there by provision for NOTIFY over TCP? Knot-DNS only supports NOTIFY over TCP and not UDP, so interoperabilty is in danger. nsd.conf(5)

Hello! I use NSD 4.7.0 self compiled: Configure line: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man --infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --disable-option-checking --disable-silent-rules --libdir=${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu --runstatedir=/run --disable-maintainer-mode --disable-dependency-tracking

Dear all, NSD 4.11.0 is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.0.tar.gz sha256 93956d90d45ffa9f84f8ca2f718a42105e4236d094ce032211849f1a12cdc158 pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.0.tar.gz.asc Version 4.11.0 sees various small features and bugfixes. One notable feature is that configuration can be reloaded and evaluated on SIGHUP, when enabled with the new

Dear nsd Users, kindly can you help me to trace the cause of this error in nsd " nsd[25372]: warning: xfrd: could not bind source address:port to socket: Cannot assign requested address". I use NSD version 4.0.1 Thank you, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100 richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf > to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include > files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP > rereads the zone info now. Wrong, I made a mistake it

We upgraded to NSD 3.2.9 (from 3.2.8) because we encountered the problem "Fix denial of existence response for empty non-terminal that looks like a NSEC3-only domain (but has data below it)." (a nasty problem with DNSSEC). But we now have IXFR issues. On one name server, NSD 3.2.9 works fine, zones are IXFRed and work. On another name server, with much more zones (and big ones), we

I have used tinydns for many many years now and it has always worked very well. I like its simplicity: 1 text file is converted into a cdb database, there's no master/slave environment (all nameservers are equal) and synchronisation is done by rsync. Tinydns is run by runit, a supervise system. I'm looking at NSD now and I think I can use NSD the same way I use tinydns. The only

On 30/07/2024 22:16, Jan-Piet Mens via nsd-users wrote: Hi Jan-Piet, > Knot-DNS only supports NOTIFY over TCP and not UDP, so interoperabilty > is in > danger. nsd.conf(5) doesn't mention protocol in either notify: or allow- > notify: > so I'm hoping [1] will add this capability. Knot DNS sends NOTIFY only over TCP. However, it will *accept* NOTIFY over both UDP and

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/nsd-users/attachments/20230222/50ca00eb/attachment.htm>

Hello World, I am trying to build NSD4 on Debian Squeeze and I get the following errors when running `make`. ``` $ pwd /home/wiz/src/nsd/tags/NSD_4_0_0_imp_5 $ make [... output omitted ...] gcc -g -O2 -o nsd-checkconf answer.o axfr.o buffer.o configlexer.o configparse acket.o query.o rbtree.o radtree.o rdata.o region-allocator.o tsig.o tsig-opens 4_pton.o b64_ntop.o -lcrypto configparser.o: In

Hello, NSD 4.8.0 running on FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE-p9 and serving both plain and DNSSEC signed zones. I noticed Permission denied errors in the logs for all domains listed in nsd.conf: [2024-01-12 12:20:05.710] nsd[8655]: info: writing zone domain-plain.org to file domain-plain.org [2024-01-12 12:20:05.710] nsd[8655]: error: cannot write zone domain-plain.org file domain-plain.org~: Permission

Hi, I have a query regarding running a manual update of nsd via: # nsdc update My NSD server is accepting notifications from two servers. From my nsd.conf: # master 1 allow-notify: X.X.X.X NOKEY request-xfr: AXFR X.X.X.X NOKEY # master 2 allow-notify: Y.Y.Y.Y NOKEY request-xfr: AXFR Y.Y.Y.Y NOKEY Are both servers sequentially queried each time