Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "pam_start() failed: system error"
2008 Sep 02
1
"pam_start() failed: system error" with dovecot 1.1.2, cause unknown
I would guess this is unlikely to be dovecot's fault, but I'm wondering
if anyone has any ideas of what might have happened based on the
evidence. My best guess is some kind of resource limit was reached but I
don't see any evidence in the logs, and the condition is now gone.
Suddenly this morning, one (and only one) of my dovecot servers decided
to start failing all logins since
2008 Nov 29
2
Dovecot POP3 problem: Authentication suddenly fails until dovecot gets restarted
Hi,
I am running dovecot with postfix and OTRS2 on a fresh Ubuntu 8.10
Server system.
OTRS2 is configured to poll new email to otrs-incoming at localhost via
POP3 every 5 minutes. It works, but after approximately 20 hours it
suddenly stops working and only a restart of dovecot helps.
The outage starts at different times during night (00:15 on Thursday,
1:15 on Friday, 3:20 on
2008 Oct 22
2
Dovecot dies with PAM error?
Just setup a new server on the weekend with Ubuntu 8.10 beta, and Dovecot
1.1.4. Every now and then, the IMAP server dies, and won't let users
authenticate. It happens about once or twice a day. In /var/log/mail.log,
you can see dovecot complaining about critial errors:
Oct 21 14:46:16 tachikoma dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<jason>,
method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, TLS
2006 Jan 31
2
SVM question
I'm running SVM from e1071 package on a data with ~150 columns (variables)
and 50000 lines of data (it takes a bit of time) for radial kernel for
different gamma and cost values.
I get a very large models with at least
30000 vectors and the prediction I get is not the best one. What does it
mean and what could I do to ameliorate my model ?
Jerzy Orlowski
2011 Dec 23
2
mbox, hierarchical folders/folders and IMAP
Hello,
I'm now dealing with funny problem. I try to use Dovecot (2.1.rc1,
actually) and mbox format to store old mailing, to keep logic of "one
folder = one file".
If I'd choose Maildir, I'd be able to create hierarchical folders (like
"OldMail -> Maillists -> Dovecot"), and in fact on disk such a folders
would be stored as real folders with dots in
2009 Feb 10
2
"failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory"
>From /var/log/auth.log (Dovecot 1.1.4 on Ubuntu 8.10):
Feb 10 08:29:06 home dovecot-auth: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_ck_connector.so): libdbus-1.so.3: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory
Feb 10 08:29:06 home dovecot-auth: PAM adding faulty module: /lib/security/pam_ck_connector.so
English, please? :) Strangely, it seemed to disappear after increasing
2008 Oct 04
2
Dlopen errors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Running Dovecot 1.1.3 and after dovecot has been running for awhile it
will just stop authenticating. Only fix is to stop and restart dovecot.
Here is the errors in the logs:
ct 4 09:34:32 goku dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.info] auth-worker(default):
pam(KVogel22,74.125.78.25): lookup service=dovecot
Oct 4 09:34:32 goku dovecot: [ID 107833
2015 May 17
0
Googling: dovecot: auth-worker(default): pam_start() failed: Critical error - immediate abort
Howdy, Googling:
dovecot: auth-worker(default): pam_start() failed: Critical error - immediate abort
dobbeltganger dovecot: auth-worker(default): pam(user,1.2.3.4): lookup service=dovecot
dobbeltganger out of memory [4543]
returns just 3 references.
Examining memory server side reveals use of virtual memory but not 100%
OS: Ubuntu 14.04 client 10.04 server-side.
Email client: Thunderbird
2013 Jul 18
2
Archiving mail
Hi,
I'm going to migrate my company-mailserver to new hardware. I would like
to take the opportunity to archive some older mail. But I would like to
have it still accessible, would this be possible with dovecot ?
I mean, I would like to put that older mail from different users (I got
about 50 users) on some read-only media but mount that media in the
users mail-dirs. That way I will have
2004 Aug 06
0
new features request
> > > Another nice feature to add would be a "bandwidth" limit (so just a
new
> > > <limit> type entry).
If you are running icecast2 on linux you can handle bandwidth limitations
using QoS
more specificly iproute2.
That way icecast2 doesnt have to take up extra resources to handle
bandwidth limitations.
resources here
cbq bash script
2004 Aug 06
2
redundant code ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi
In connection.c arround line 847 icecast2 does:
if (global.clients >= client_limit) {
client_send_504(client,
"The server is already full. Try again later.");
global_unlock();
return;
}
Then just a little bit later, does the same thing in the if (source) {}
block.
Is this code
2004 Aug 06
1
new features request
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Dave St John wrote:
> I think that would be a good feature to add in icecast2, dont get me wrong,
> im just saying with QoS
> you have far much more flexibility in handling bandwidth.
> tcp/ip packets can be marked with iptables and then ran threw tc which you
> could then prioritize your packets
You mean by using
2004 Aug 06
2
new features request
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Geoff Shang wrote:
> Mihai RUSU wrote:
>
> > Another nice feature to add would be a "bandwidth" limit (so just a new
> > <limit> type entry).
>
> Problem with this is, what do you do once the limit has been reached? Who
> do you kick? Or do you just not allow anymore listeners?
I
2004 Aug 06
0
new features request
I think that would be a good feature to add in icecast2, dont get me wrong,
im just saying with QoS
you have far much more flexibility in handling bandwidth.
tcp/ip packets can be marked with iptables and then ran threw tc which you
could then prioritize your packets
set a limit and a burst for variable bitrates.
(http://svana.org/kleptog/Packet-Shaping-HOWTO.txt)
I know there isnt any "drop
2004 Aug 06
2
new features request
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I will need to find a solution for server side limit of clients bandwidth
depending on their IPs (because we have very fast local connections
with local ISPs and slow "external" connections with the rest of the
Internet).
Initially I think I'll just start 2 icecast servers (one for "local"
clients, one for
2004 Aug 06
2
new features request
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Dave St John wrote:
> > > > Another nice feature to add would be a "bandwidth" limit (so just a
> new
> > > > <limit> type entry).
> If you are running icecast2 on linux you can handle bandwidth limitations
> using QoS
> more specificly iproute2.
You mistunderstood me. No, I
2004 Aug 06
2
icecast 2 auth problem with (old?) ices, MuSe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I have recently downloaded icecast 2 (I am an old icecast 1.x user) and
tried to use it with my ices 0.2.3 (which works on icecast 1) but fails on
login. Also I have tried with MuSe 0.8.1 and same error too. After some
digging into the sources I found the problem to be with _check_pass_icy()
which receives a "strange" pass to compare
2004 Aug 06
0
More libshout questions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Deven Phillips wrote:
> Okay,
>
> I am using libshout to stream to a NullSoft Shoutcast server. I am
> using libmad and libmp3lame to do re-encoding on the fly. I am streaming
> to the server (currently) with shout_send_raw(). When I try to use
> shout_metadata_add(), I get a segfault in strdup(). Anyone have
2004 Aug 06
3
net/sock.c question
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I have started to add bandwidth <limit> option to icecast. My ideea is to
compute the current bandwidth by estimation on each sock_write*() call.
Something like this:
1. initially we set kbps = 0, kbps_time = now and kbps_bytes = 0
2. after some time, a sock_write*() function is called which in turn calls
sock_kbps_update(nobytes);
2007 Oct 22
2
pam_ldap.so memory leaks?
Hello List,
I have a question about dovecot-1.1.0-beta3 but first I'll ramble a
little bit:
Recently I upgraded a 0.99 installation of dovecot to 1.0.5. All went
relatively smoothly until the dovecot-auth process began returning "out
of memory" after a day. There is a rather large user base here.
The current setup is using passdb pam with blocking=yes, with
pam_ldap.so handling