similar to: share enumeration, samba-dcerpcd, variable %i

Am 29.07.24 um 13:20 schrieb Zhuchenko Valery via samba: > hi, samba team and other, > > client software calls samba and samba reads /etc/samba/smb.conf where > some parameter contains variable %i (client ip address), but when samba > calls samba-dcerpcd, it again reads /etc/samba/smb.conf where some > parameter contains variable %i and at that moment %i is not client ip

Am 29.07.24 um 14:35 schrieb Zhuchenko Valery via samba: > user may be same, but from client ip1 this user can't see shares, which > can see from client ip2. > need share enumeration by client ip Have you checked if "hosts allow" in combination with "access based share enum" does what you want?

user may be same, but from client ip1 this user can't see shares, which can see from client ip2. need share enumeration by client ip 29.07.2024 16:20, Christian Naumer via samba ?????: > Am 29.07.24 um 13:48 schrieb Zhuchenko Valery via samba: >> "hosts allow" about access to browseable share, I need different >> shares lists > > How about "access based

Am 29.07.24 um 13:48 schrieb Zhuchenko Valery via samba: > "hosts allow" about access to browseable share, I need different shares > lists How about "access based share enum" as a Machine is also just a user you could use the "valid users" option.

from ip1=192.168.222.96 and ip2=192.168.22.96 user zvn2 receive test in list, hosts allow = 192.168.222.96 in config for share test and global access based share enum = Yes, but I need share test in list only from ip1=192.168.222.96 when ip1=192.168.222.96 $ smbclient -L 192.168.22.135 --use-kerberos=off -U zvn2%pppppppp -W . ?? ?Sharename?????? Type????? Comment ?? ?---------??????

"hosts allow" about access to browseable share, I need different shares lists 29.07.2024 15:33, Christian Naumer via samba: > Am 29.07.24 um 13:20 schrieb Zhuchenko Valery via samba: >> hi, samba team and other, >> >> client software calls samba and samba reads /etc/samba/smb.conf where >> some parameter contains variable %i (client ip address), but when

Hi There, I've been having an issue trying to figure out a way to policy route outbound packets from a multihomed machine through the proper interface using IPFW to no avail. I've tried several different incantations of IPFW fwd/forward statements, and none of them seem to do the trick. Basically, I have a host that has multiple Internet connections. This host is running FreeBSD 4.9

Dear All. I want to use 'not' for 2 addresses (for both) in ipfw2 rule. The only way that looks like what I need is # ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3 But does this rule indeed makes what I want? Does it count all packets destined to addresses other then IP2 AND IP3?! No other syntax works. For example more logically correct not IP2 AND not IP3 or even not { IP2 or IP3 } are

I have a simple script: #!/bin/bash # index=0 total=0 names=() ip=() while read -r LINE do NODENAME=` echo $LINE | cut -f 1 -d ','` IP=` echo $LINE | cut -f 2 -d ','` names[index]="$NODENAME" ip[index]="$IP" index=`expr index+1` total=`expr total+1` done <<< $(cat list.txt) simple file: more list.txt name1,ip1 name2,ip2 name3,ip3 output when

hy Hope everyone is fine, I have one issue coming in asterisk , What i am doing is i am generating a callback if some one calls at a specif access number on asterisk, Asterisk sends a busy signal to the calling party that he received a request from party and then sends the call back to the person from where asterisk received a request but in From field as you can see below astrisk is sending the

27.06.2016 18:45, mathias dufresne: > Perhaps you don't have yet duplicate objectSid as that's not supposed to be > possible. > Rather than scripting something to look for objectSid used twice I would > start with dbcheck and other tools to verify that your database is > consistent and identical on all servers. [root at pdc ~]# samba-tool dbcheck Checking 3346 objects

Hello I have a PC with 2 IPs publics IP1 in eth0 and IP2 in eth0:0 I want to do a redirection of IP2 to an other public IP IP3 in an other laptop (other network) - for all ports : IP2 ---> IP3 - for juste www : IP2:www --> IP3:www i tried many combination with shorewall-3.0.7-4, but no sucess no help from google, Thanks in advance Laurent

Hi All, I''m a big user of the LARTC document but am currently stuck with a question around section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) in relation to "Routing for multiple uplinks/providers". I''m wanting to do a similar setup to the diagram where I have - lets just say for the moment - two uplink providers where I want to route over two

Hi all, is there a way to combine iptables parameters like: iptables -A OUTPUT -p UDP & -p TCP -d $IP1 & -d $IP2 ? Best Regards Marcus

HI All , I am running a FC6 box with two internet links with load balance . Every thing is working fine expect the MSN connection that failed and reconnect every time and SSL connections . I would link to know if with the nona howto I could fix that . I have been tried with no success to redirect that connection only to one link but its look like do not work . Here my configuration :

Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I''m not finding much information online. I''m trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the instructions in lartc section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) fairly clear and straightforward. I implemented those, and a couple of trivial

Hi all, I''ve a routing problem. I''m setting up a router based on debian (kernel 2.4). I need to setup routing to export an ftp service (ftp server is in dmz) to 2 wan (both). I setup prerouting ad forward rule with no problem. The problem is that reply packet use default gateway (default wan) even though they are enter using the other wan. I solved it marking packets in input

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

Hi Everybody in the list I have a situation like this ------ (IP1) linux |----eth0.40------ | router | | | box | (IP2) |------|Client Router ( Destiantion Net DNET) |----eth0.41------ | | /27 subnet ------ I just want to balance the load of bandwidth per packet based between the two vlan interfaces to Client Destination network

Hi, i''m a shorewall users and i have the following problem: I have one class C range of IP''s and i have three zones (net, dmz , loc) I need create one rule to dnat one valid ip address (but not in use in one computer) to one invalid host in my loc zone. How i do? I try this: DNAT net:200.200.200.200 dmz:200.193.137.38 tcp 137,138,139,445 -