similar to: PLAIN password scheme question

Dear all, Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I've just downloaded the newly-released Dovecot 1.0.2, but found that the PLAIN.B64 password scheme patch seems to be missing. http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-May/022610.html Is there any reason for this? Thank you very much. -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' <imacat at mail.imacat.idv.tw> PGP Key:

I'm getting a very strange error and I'm completely mystified by it. Thank you so much for taking a look! I recently migrated some users from another dovecot server to my own, and the previous admin had the passwords in their database using the SSHA256 scheme in HEX format. All the password hashes are in my database (MySQL) with a {SSHA256.HEX} prefix, and I thought at first that they

A new package ppls is now available on CRAN. The ppls package implements penalized Partial Leasts Squares (PLS). In a nutshell, supervised dimensionality reduction via PLS is combined with penalization techniques. Features of the package include * estimation of linear regression models with penalized PLS, * estimation of generalized additive models with penalized PLS based on splines

A new package ppls is now available on CRAN. The ppls package implements penalized Partial Leasts Squares (PLS). In a nutshell, supervised dimensionality reduction via PLS is combined with penalization techniques. Features of the package include * estimation of linear regression models with penalized PLS, * estimation of generalized additive models with penalized PLS based on splines

¿Alguien ha utilizado el paquete dynGraph? ¡No logro nada! Gracias anticipadas Jorge *************************************************************************************************** 1 de Agosto de 1961, creación del Ministerio del Transporte. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'm building this with llvm-c, and accessing these intrinsics via calling the intrinsic as if it were a function. class F_SREG<string OpStr, NVPTXRegClass regclassOut, Intrinsic IntOp> : NVPTXInst<(outs regclassOut:$dst), (ins), OpStr, [(set regclassOut:$dst, (IntOp))]>; def INT_PTX_SREG_TID_X : F_SREG<"mov.u32 \t$dst, %tid.x;",

Ok, as I said, the most precise way to figure out what's wrong is to emit LLVM IR first (use clang -emit-llvm ...) and check out how it differs from working examples, for instance, nvptx regression tests. ----- Original message ----- > I'm building this with llvm-c, and accessing these intrinsics via calling > the intrinsic as if it were a function. > > class F_SREG<string

Hi Timothy, I'm not sure what you mean by this working for other intrinsics, but in this case, I think you want the intrinsic name llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.tid.x. For me, this looks like: %x = call i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.tid.x() Pete On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldridge at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm building this with llvm-c, and accessing these

I've written a compiler that outputs PTX code, the result seems fairly reasonable, but I'm not sure the intrinsics are getting compiled correctly. In addition, when I try load the module using CUDA, I get an error: CUDA_ERROR_NO_BINARY_FOR_GPU. I'm running this on a 2012 MBP with a 640M GPU. PTX Code (for a mandelbrot calculation): // // Generated by LLVM NVPTX Back-End //

Dear R users, an update of the package ppls - Penalized Partial Least Squares - is now available on CRAN. It implements the methods described in N. Kr?mer, A.-L. Boulesteix, G. Tutz "Penalized Partial Least Squares with Applications to B-Spline Transformations and Functional Data" Chem. Intell. Lab. Sys. 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2008.06.009 Features of the package

Dear R users, an update of the package ppls - Penalized Partial Least Squares - is now available on CRAN. It implements the methods described in N. Kr?mer, A.-L. Boulesteix, G. Tutz "Penalized Partial Least Squares with Applications to B-Spline Transformations and Functional Data" Chem. Intell. Lab. Sys. 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2008.06.009 Features of the package

require(ppls) data(BOD) X<-BOD[,1] y<-BOD[,2] Xtest=seq(min(X),max(X),length=200) dummy<-X2s(X,Xtest,deg=3,nknot=20) Z<-dummy$Z Ztest<-dummy$Ztest size<-dummy$sizeZ P<-Penalty.matrix(size,order=2) lambda<-200 number.comp<-3 penalized.pls(Z,y,P=lambda*P,ncomp=number.comp)$coefficients # By default kernel=F

The identifier INT_PTX_SREG_TID_X is the name of an instruction as the back-end sees it, and has very little to do with the name you should use in your IR. Your best bet is to look at the include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsNVVM.td file and see the definitions for each intrinsic. Then, the name mapping is just: int_foo_bar -> llvm.foo.bar() int_ prefix becomes llvm., and all underscores turn into

Timothy, Those calls to compute grid intrinsics are definitely wrong. In ptx code they should end up into reading special registers, rather than function calls. Try to take some working example and figure out the LLVM IR differences between it and the result of your compiler. - D. ----- Original message ----- > I've written a compiler that outputs PTX code, the result seems fairly >

There's an upper limit to how many IMAP/POP3 connections can exist that haven't logged in (and separate limits for post-login). Normally when this limit is reached, the oldest connection gets disconnected. There is of course some potential to try to DoS Dovecot by doing a lot of IMAP/POP3 connections, but because the oldest connection always gets destroyed this requires quite a lot of

There's an upper limit to how many IMAP/POP3 connections can exist that haven't logged in (and separate limits for post-login). Normally when this limit is reached, the oldest connection gets disconnected. There is of course some potential to try to DoS Dovecot by doing a lot of IMAP/POP3 connections, but because the oldest connection always gets destroyed this requires quite a lot of

Hay! Has anyone come across these errors using valgrind for the oggenc tool or the encoder_example.c: ==13108== Invalid read of size 4 ==13108== at 0x4155734: _vp_offset_and_mix (in /usr/local/lib/libvorbis.so.0.4.1) ==13108==

Is there a way to limit the amount of maildir folders a user can have? Also is there is hard limit on the amount of folders dovecot can handle? I have a user who has over 3000 folder (including subfolders) that is having issues with delays in loading, moving, and deleting messages. Thanks in advance Jeff N.

My ISP currently runs version 1.2 and I'm looking to make use of UIDPLUS because I want to append and then move the message I've just appended to another folder so then I need the UID in order to address the new message. My ISP says they have plans to upgrade to version 1.4 soon. Do either of these versions support UIDPLUS? ie. give me the new UID as the response to an append?

Hi all! I have a corpus of virtual users ( user1 at domain.tld , user2 at domain.tld, user3 at domain.tld,..., usern at domain.tld ... ) authenticated against Active Directory. Is it possible to group some users (virtual) and give appropriate ACLs on a shared imap public folder using an ACL vfile? thanks in advance Dimitrios