similar to: Is :finder_sql using #{id} broken?

Hi All, I need to run some reports via cron. I know I can use runner and call a method in a model class. But I''d really like to use templates and IMO this kind of logic belongs in a controller anyways. These are periodic reports so I don''t need nor want to leave a server running all the time, so getting the data via curl/wget isn''t really an option. What I really

This is my first rails app with a legacy database and I''m having a terrible time getting the models set up correctly. I have an order table that has a primary field named order_number. I have a name table with a primary of item_number. These two tables are liked by the item_number and the order_number, but not as you might think. If the order_number is 2500, then each entry in

Hi there, I need help with IFELSE function. The column g of my dataset pth, pth$g consists of "aa", "ao", "dcl", "iy", "sh". The last few values of pth$g looks like: [4496] sh ao ao sh iy dcl dcl aa iy iy aa sh ao ao Levels: aa ao dcl iy sh I want to convert these values into 1,2,3,4,5. I tried to use a loop and I found the following

Dears, [Rails 1.0.0] I''m working with a legacy schema, and around my 20+ models i''ve used some AR constructs. They are based on a finder_sql doing some dirty sql and using #{id} from the ''pivot'' model for extracting data in other tables. like : class Division < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name "legacy_division" set_primary_key

Guys, I have a need to support as has_many/belongs_to relationship on a legacy(kind of) schema. The reason I say kind of is that the schema does have "id" columns that are used in many associations, but this particular has_many/belongs_to association needs to support different ones. I''ve attached to code at the end of this email. Suffice it to say I need to use the standard

I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing. I have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish to use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign keys. What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''. Let''s say the tables are "stores" and

Hi all, My question is somewhat complicated, but bear with me. My project has a number of models: User, Program, and Team. Users belong to multiple Programs. Programs have multiple teams, but Teams belong to one program. For each Program a User belongs to, he can belong to multiple Teams. (Think of this in an athletic context where users are athletes, programs are universities). So my

hi all, I have a Class, Client, which has_many projects (Project class). the projects depend on a session_id variable, however. So the question is, how can I do the following: has_many :projects, :finder_sql => "SELECT p.* FROM projects p INNER JOIN projects_users pu ON pu.project_id = p.id WHERE pu.user_id = #{session[:user_id]}" The problem is that I need to filter a

Hello gurus, I have some variables, and i am creating combinations for analysis in the end i need these variables to be displayed like "LEPTIN+SAA+PTH". currently i am using loop to perform this. I would appreciate any pointers to do it without the loop. > mols=c("LEPTIN","SAA","PTH","sEGFR") > samples=mols[1:3] > samples [1]

I have an inner join query that Action Record can''t seem to pull off conventionally, so I''m trying to use :finder_sql to utilize an sql query that works beautifully in SQL. The problem is, when I try to call the method, I get the following: private method `gsub'' called for #<Array:0x267de04> Here is my has_many code: has_many :mod_privileges,

from the api I got: <pre> has_many :subscribers, :class_name => "Person", :finder_sql => ''SELECT DISTINCT people.* '' + ''FROM people p, post_subscriptions ps '' + ''WHERE ps.post_id = #{id} AND ps.person_id = p.id '' + ''ORDER BY p.first_name'' </pre> I would like to pass in the

I''m building an app that needs i18n support across the entire database (i.e. localized attributes). In order to do this I''ve created a special HABTM join table that can be associated with _any_ other table: create table language_strings ( for_table varchar(255) not null, foreign_id int not null, language_id varchar(5) not null, attr_name varchar(255) not null, value text

Hi, I am so novice in using R. I have some problems in my R script below which fits time series data and predict it one-step ahead. Here is a brief explanation on what I try to achieve Th16k is time series data (500 data points). The size of window for fitting and predicting is 50 (data points). As you can easily discover from my code, (fixed) window is moving/sliding to get next one-step

I''m sure there''s something right under my nose that I''m missing. I have two tables with two parallel one-to-many relationships. I wish to use the :finder_sql parameter to essentially ''or'' the two foreign keys. What isn''t working for me is performing a ''sub-search''. Let''s say the tables are "stores" and

Is there any way to do eager loading when using custom :finder_sql ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hello, I have the finder_sql problem and I found this patch http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/7576; but I don''t know how to use this patch?? I copied all the changes into the correct files and restartet the server of my ruby on rails application, but nothing changed. Could someone tell me please how I have to use this patch?? Thanks Manfred

I never would have figured this out in many moons: has_many :subscribers, :class_name => "Person", :finder_sql => ''SELECT DISTINCT people.* '' + ''FROM people p, post_subscriptions ps '' + ''WHERE ps.post_id = #{id} AND ps.person_id = p.id '' + ''ORDER BY p.first_name'' Variable

Is it supposed to do that? I find it very confusing. AR 3.0.10 class Unit has_many :units, :finder_sql => proc { "SELECT * FROM `#{table_name}` WHERE `location_id`=#{id} AND `location_type`=#{Location::UNIT}" } end Both should return []. However... >> Unit.first.units.find([1000000]) [2011-09-27 10:05:11|main|debug] Unit Load (4.0ms) SELECT `units`.* FROM `units`

Hello, In a model I have: has_many :things, :finder_sql => '' select * from other_things '' + '' where id = #{id} '' When I do MyClass.find(:all, :include => :things) I get a weird error: from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:120:in

I can submit a patch, but wanted to confirm I''m looking at this right... The docs indicate that if you specify a has_many association with :finder_sql, but no :counter_sql, it constructs the appropriate counter sql by substituting the SELECT clause. But has_many_association.rb doesn''t seem to do that -- it just passes Base#count_by_sql the finder_sql, which doesn''t