similar to: confused about deliver

This is on Fedora FC5 x86_64 rpm -q wine wine-0.9.14-1.fc5 winecfg wine: creating configuration directory '/home/nbecker/.wine'... X Error of failed request: GLXBadContext Major opcode of failed request: 143 (GLX) Minor opcode of failed request: 5 (X_GLXMakeCurrent) Serial number of failed request: 166 Current serial number in output stream: 166 wine: wineprefixcreate failed

I'm using maildir (and have been for a long time). Today I have a problem: ls -al (maildir): [...] drwx------ 5 nbecker nbecker 4096 Jan 1 2006 .;SECTION= What's this? It seems to be causing my mail client (kmail, using dimap), to hang.

Trivial hello world program compiles with -O3, but with -O4: (BTW, is there a guide to what different -On mean?) llvm-g++ -O4 Hello.cc -o Hello -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.4.source/configure --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/nbecker/llvm-2.4 --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc.

I'm using maildrop to filter mail like: xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc" xfilter "/usr/bin/bogofilter -ep" I want to change to deliver (so I can use sieve) but can deliver do this?

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote: > OK, let me rephrase this. What is the preferred way to install llvm + > llvm- > gcc onto a fedora system? The preferred way to install LLVM and LLVM-GCC is the same on pretty much any Linux system and described here: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#starting > Here is what I used: >

I build llvm-gcc as: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --program- prefix=llvm So it should install into /usr/local/... but add llvm- prefix. This is so llvm-gcc is found by llvm (http://llvm.org/releases/2.5/docs/GettingStarted.html claims that's what it is looking for) and also so there will be no conflict with system gcc. But I see:

Missed %{_mandir}/man1/xapian-progsrv.1* diff -u RPM/BUILD/xapian-core-0.9.9/xapian.spec RPM/SPECS/xapian.spec --- RPM/BUILD/xapian-core-0.9.9/xapian.spec 2006-11-09 09:14:38.000000000 -0500 +++ RPM/SPECS/xapian.spec 2006-11-09 09:14:03.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ # RedHat-style .spec file for Xapian # xapian.spec. Generated from xapian.spec.in by configure. -Summary: The Xapian

One of the annoyances of ssh is the need to transfer the public key from client machine to server machine, and append to authorized_keys. Although it's simple to do, it's annoying to have to do this manually. Why can't this be automated? ssh offers to add new machine to known_hosts. Why doesn't it offer to add the public key to authorized_keys?

This wins the 2007 award for strangest (or most amusing) log message: dovecot: Time just moved backwards by 13 seconds. This might cause a lot of problems, so I'll just kill myself now. It does, unfortunately, leave dovecot dead, which was pretty mysterious to me. Maybe it could re-exec instead?

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15502 Summary: Unknown LVDS configuration bits Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: low Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: pee at

OK, let me rephrase this. What is the preferred way to install llvm + llvm- gcc onto a fedora system? Here is what I used: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --program- prefix=llvm make make install ../llvm-2.5/configure --enable-optimized --prefix=/usr/local make make install

I'm currently using maildrop to do delivery, because I like to use it's xfilter to pipe through spamc. I don't see a similar option for dovecot's deliver. Is there something? It would be nice to use deliver, since I use dovecot for reading mail.

I'm using maildrop for delivery, because I want to filter through spamassassin before delivery. Maildrop makes that trivial. It seems deliver can pipe (one way) to a command, but what is needed is to pipe: deliver -> spamd -> deliver which is what the maildrop xfilter does.

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:09 PM Kevin Neal <Kevin.Neal at sas.com> wrote: > If we don’t have constrained intrinsics for some of the fp math > instructions then aren’t we risking non-strict optimizations? > So far we've only added constrained FP intrinsics for operations that have side effects (i.e. can trap). The quiet-computational sign-bit operations are special. They never

Howdy all, This may be the dumbest question in the world, but how can you "add one month" to a Date object? I can''t just add 30 days, because months have varying lengths. Any help would be much appreciated... Thanks! -Neal --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Well, yes, they are different operations. And, yes, this needs to be corrected. This wasn’t my point. It’s a given. I was getting at the _declared_ absence of side effects and what promises we make to anyone using the new fneg instruction. Is this a promise we want to make? From: Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:30 PM To: Kevin Neal

Hi all, I'm trying to figure out a way to create a data graphic that I haven't ever seen an example of before, but hopefully there's an R package out there for it. The idea is to essentially create a heatmap, but to allow each column and/or row to be a different width, rather than having uniform column and row height. This is sort of like a Marimekko chart in appearance, except that

Thanks for all the replies which are really helpful. one more question regarding transformation: 4. Given an instruction %x1 = I1, can I replace the rhs "I1" with "I2" and get a new instruction %x1 = I2? Alternatively, I can add a new instruction %x2 = I2, and replace all uses of %x1 with %x2, and then delete %x1 = I1, but it seems the former is simpler or faster if

Hi All, I am running Samba3.0 beta 3 installed from RPM's provided on the Samba.org FTP server. My platform is Red Hat 9. I am seeing a lot of errors such as: Aug 6 17:50:18 server3 winbindd[31138]: [2003/08/06 17:50:18, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_sid.c:winbindd_lookupname(103) Aug 6 17:50:18 server3 winbindd[31138]: could not find domain entry for domain AND smbd[27004]: [2003/08/06

Hi We have a problem with the one way trusts between the DEV and PROD domains (Windows 2003). Microsoft told me to use NTLM instead of kerberos. Is there a way to force samba to use NTLM (or NTLMv2) instead of kerberos? Regards Urs