similar to: assertion failed in 1.1.7 file mbox-sync.c: line 1305 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "assertion failed in 1.1.7 file mbox-sync.c: line 1305 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates)"

2017 Jul 26
0
Issue on install - file mbox-sync.c: line 1371 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates): assertion failed: (trailer_size <= 2)
First of all apologies for using such an old version - I am trying to upgrade slowly and have had to go through this version first. As you can see I am getting an error in the log file as : file mbox-sync.c: line 1371 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates): assertion failed: (trailer_size <= 2) Raw backtrace: imap [0x80acdc1] -> imap [0x80accdc] -> imap(mbox_sync+0x14e9) [0x8079a29]
2007 Oct 22
2
Problem in mbox-sync.c
We've just cut over to a new mail server running Dovecot 1.0.5. The underlying OS is RHEL 5. User mailboxes are stored in Unix mbox format on a local ext3 file system. The MTA on the system is the default RedHat version of Sendmail 8.13.8 with procmail for local delivery. We're using a combination of dotlock and fcntl style locking. The output of "dovecot -n" for this system
2012 Jan 10
1
Panic: file mbox-sync.c: line 1348: assertion failed
Hallo, I have the following problem with doveadm: # gdb --args /opt/local/bin/doveadm -v mailbox status -u userxy/g029 'messages' "Software-alle/AK-Software-Tagung" GNU gdb 5.3 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
2005 Oct 20
2
1.0.alpha4 released
The actual alpha4 release this time. With a few changes since the pre-release. The important changes again: - Default lock_method changed to flock instead of the old fcntl. Solaris users will need to set it back to fcntl. This makes sure that Dovecot's indexes aren't accidentally used with NFS. - IMAP: We might have sent extra EXPUNGE messages when output buffer got full. This could
2005 Aug 16
2
test80: assert/core debug info
Timo, Attached is gdb information from core dumps related to the following assert in test-80: IMAP(username): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 442 (mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 || ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid) My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format. test-80 compiled with gcc 4.0.1 using the following configure options: CC=gcc
2009 Jul 05
1
mbox sync failure2
Hello, list, I'm new here and also new to Dovecot. On Friday evening (perhaps not the best moment...) I sent the following question but it seems to have been lost somehow: Yesterday I had to reboot my server machine and I think there was an email client connected from the LAN during the reboot which I did not notice then. Now that mailbox is no longer accessible: as soon as I try to
2015 Mar 26
0
Error "Next message unexpectedly lost from mbox file"
Hi, i am the new one;) - and my first post is about a problem i ran into. I installed a mailserver on a RaspberryPi. It works mostly well, using dovecot 2.1.7. (exim4 4.8 (not in use, smtp direct to Provider), fetchmail 6.3.21, RasPi 3.12.28+, Roundcube (no version known) - the whole system went through an apg-get update/uppgrade this night to look if a known problem already been fixed. When
2017 Jun 06
2
2.2.29.8: YACD (Yet Another Core Dump)
I'm getting this in my logfile, should I worry?: Jun 06 12:28:47 imap(paco_mcs): Error: Next message unexpectedly corrupted in mbox file /var/spool/mail/paco_mcs at 639279728 Jun 06 12:28:47 imap(paco_mcs): Error: Unexpectedly lost From-line from mbox file /var/spool/mail/paco_mcs at 639279728 Jun 06 12:28:47 imap(paco_mcs): Panic: file mbox-sync.c: line 1338 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates):
2004 Jun 18
3
1.0-test17
http://dovecot.org/test/ Just mbox fixes since 1.0-test16. The logic is simpler and more correct now. Can anyone break it anymore? I actually tested it a while with Evolution and several mailboxes and it didn't break at least immediately. :) Now maybe a few more days and I dare trying this thing myself with my real mboxes (yes, I'm still using them). Dovecot mailing list archives could
2015 Mar 27
0
Error "Next message unexpectedly lost from mbox file"
BehrensM <EDV2 at BehrensM.de> writes: > Beside the lokal mailserver-account(s) there is/are pulled Mails via > imap direct from the mailprovider, the "old" solution which shall be > replaced by the new mailserver. imap direct from provider shows the > mails/Attachments in corrects size an opening works. > Only using the local mailserver fails. > ... > Mar 26
2017 Jun 06
0
2.2.29.8: YACD (Yet Another Core Dump)
This looks like a coprrupted mbox file Aki On 06.06.2017 15:54, Luciano Mannucci wrote: > I'm getting this in my logfile, should I worry?: > > Jun 06 12:28:47 imap(paco_mcs): Error: Next message unexpectedly corrupted in mbox file /var/spool/mail/paco_mcs at 639279728 > Jun 06 12:28:47 imap(paco_mcs): Error: Unexpectedly lost From-line from mbox file /var/spool/mail/paco_mcs at
2006 Jan 24
0
1.0beta2: mbox_sync assert
Timo, My first assert in beta2. Syslog said: Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): Cached message offset 94625 is invalid for mbox file /var/mail/m/user Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file mbox-sync.c: line 1471 (mbox_sync_do): assertion failed: (!sync_ctx->mbox->mbox_sync_dirty || (flags & MBOX_SYNC_UNDIRTY) == 0) Gdb
2007 Jan 05
2
Dovecot rc15 crash in mbox-sync-update.c
Here is another crash we've been seeing recently in rc15 on Solaris 10. (gdb) bt full #0 0xff1c12a4 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #1 0xff140040 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #2 0x000786a8 in t_buffer_alloc (size=688976) at data-stack.c:346 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "file %s: line %" #3 0x00078190 in t_pop () at data-stack.c:149 frame_block = (struct
2013 Aug 05
1
Corrupted mboxes with v2.2.4, posix_fallocate and GFS2
Hi, on a clustered Dovecot server installation that was recently moved from a shared GPFS filesystem to GFS2, occasional corruptions in the users' INBOXes started appearing, where a new incoming message would be appended directly after a block of NUL bytes, and be scanned by dovecot as being glued to the preceding message. I traced this to the file extension operation performed in
2005 Jun 09
1
Error on pop3
Hi, I've installed dovecot on my server (pop3 service on dovecot 1.0 stable plus patch for more logging, postfix as mta) and it's ok (not all, need more fine-tuning) but on one account i've a problem.. the account is read by oe 6, message on server mode. dovecot: Jun 09 15:00:18 Info: pop3-login: Login: info-xxx, auth: PLAIN, lip: [151.8.36.12], rip: [xx.xx.xx.xx] dovecot: Jun 09
2005 May 16
2
Assertion Failure in mbox-sync.c
I've been getting a few of these errors on a couple different mboxes. This is using the CVS version as of May 14. So far, these are the only errors and it looks like most/all of the older ones are gone. (maybe I shouldn't say that ;-) dovecot: May 16 17:41:07 Error: 20973 IMAP(todd.bluegenesis.com): file mbox-sync.c: line 1165 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates): assertion failed:
2006 Dec 14
2
604995471 7500 routers / upgrade issue
Hi Benjamin: I think that the following link will give you an idea for what you need to know: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/620/roadmap_b.shtml This is for the naming: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1818/products_tech_note09186a0080101cda.shtml In this case 11.1CC goes to 12.0T and 12.0T migrate to 12.1 mainline. Do not you worry you will not loose anything with the new
2006 Jan 27
1
gcc 2.95 compile errors
Timo, This is what I get when I compile 1.0-beta2 with gcc 2.95. It looks like I can then open my problem mbox even without your mbox-sync patch. It turns out I'd been using gcc 3.2.2 inadvertently, probably via some sort of shell bug - I'd accidentally set an environment variable called "PATH=/opt/RDGgcc3/bin:/usr/bin ..." and I guess some script had mistaken it for the real
2007 Mar 02
2
rc25: need_space assert, core
Timo, I see where at least one other person reported this, but here goes. I went from rc24 to rc25 this morning, and I got an assert and core from my own mailbox withing five minutes: Mar 2 06:52:26 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(jaearick): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 408: assertion failed: (need_space == (uoff_t)-mails[idx].space) Mar 2 06:52:26 karst dovecot: [ID 107833
2006 Nov 12
2
assertion failed: (need_space == (uoff_t)-mails[idx].space)
I'm running Dovecot dovecot-1.0.r13 on FreeBSD (FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE- p10). Mail is stored in mbox format (dovecot.conf after the msg). Procmail delivers mail to subfolders under ~/.mail, locking using dotfiles. One folder in particular for one user has an mbox file ~/.mail/Cron. Quite often, I'll see that procmail processes are stacking up because ~/.mail/Cron.lock exists, and