similar to: scattered thoughts on connection sharing

Thanks for replying! And noted, re: patience... will do. Passing -O proxy works!! This great! I feared I'd have to write an SSH client or something. You have improved my mood by at least 300%. I can't find this option documented ANYWHERE. Is it documented? Re: socket paths: thanks for the sample, I guess I'll use the .ssh dir too :) Re: thing 5: you're right it DOES do it

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024, mark.yagnatinsky at barclays.com wrote: > Resending, got blocked last time. > > I have a few things I'd like to say about the (seriously nifty) connection sharing feature of OpenSSH and I'm not sure if the convention here is to use one email thread per distinct thing or just stuff everything into one email. > I decided to combine them because splitting is

Not sure what the standard etiquette around these parts is for how long to wait for a reply but I thought it might be faster than this... Or did I breach etiquette in my original email? If so, I'd appreciate someone explicitly telling me "your email was bad and you should feel bad" I cope poorly with radio silence. Thanks in advance for any reply at all, Mark. -----Original

I'm not entitled to a response, but I'm surely entitled to send a reminder, no? Or are you saying that even sending a reminder is itself a gross breach of etiquette? -----Original Message----- From: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2024 6:57 PM To: Yagnatinsky, Mark : IT (NYK) <mark.yagnatinsky at barclays.com> Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

I don't know enough about DMARC to make any sense of what you just said... actually wait, maybe I get it. You're saying that email sent that I send to the list will land in your inbox with my address in the From header. But the recipient mail system will think to itself "this message couldn't possibly have come from Mark, because a cursory inspection of the routing history clearly

[sorry off-topic, ignore if uninterested in dmarc/dkim/mail filters] On 2024/07/17 22:14, mark.yagnatinsky at barclays.com wrote: > I don't know enough about DMARC to make any sense of what you just said... actually wait, maybe I get it. > You're saying that email sent that I send to the list will land in your inbox with my address in the From header. > But the recipient mail

I promised to be more patient and I think I'm doing better this time :) But I think I've waited long enough to be entitled to send a reminder now ;) So: does anyone know if -O proxy is documented anywhere official? Once I knew what to look for, I found the release notes for the version it was added, but I'd have never found that if I didn't already know the option name. In order

On Mon, 22 Jul 2024, mark.yagnatinsky at barclays.com wrote: > I promised to be more patient and I think I'm doing better this time :) > But I think I've waited long enough to be entitled to send a reminder now ;) Well there's your mistake: you're not _entitled_ to anything from a bunch of volunteers.

On 2024/07/17 11:39, mark.yagnatinsky at barclays.com wrote: > Thanks for replying! And noted, re: patience... will do. Note that this mailing list doesn't rewrite sender addresses, so it is likely to result in email failing DMARC checks. In many places spam filters don't give a high enough spam score for DMARC failure to treat the mail as spam without additional signs, but for

It appears that my attempts to "chase" emails on this list are not being taken to kindly. (The most recent response actually really stung.) So: I plan to not chase this thread. This is not easy for me because I like "closure", but oh well. I noticed a bug that is not inconveniencing me at all. In fact, it's saving me a few characters of typing. I consider it my duty as a

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 5:14?AM Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> wrote: > The mail admins can choose what is covered by the DKIM signature. > In the case of barclays.com there are various headers (which I think > make it through the mailing list untouched) but also the body, which > does not; a footer with the list URL is added. The real issue here is that the Mailman

Hi, Our smbclient calls have started failing on connections to Windows 2008 AD servers. (Previously there were only Windows 2003 Servers, so we had no issues.) Domain=[INTRANET] OS=[Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 7601 Service Pack 1] Server=[Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 6.1] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME Is this post [ http://serverfault.com/a/303483 ] correct when

Dear all I''ve gotten into the habit of including SVN headers in my templates, etc so it is easy to see where the file installed into /etc/puppet/ came from. Furthermore, we use svn cp to create release branches. Therefore, you''ll see something like this: # $Id: dumpadm.conf 1239 2007-10-23 16:04:06Z sa_dewha $ # $URL:

I''m thinking about how to set up the processes for Production puppet runs now. Being ultra-conservative here, we''d like to see what would happen before pressing the red button. I can run in noop mode, and everything is evaluated but nothing is done. A YAML report magically appears on the Puppetmaster which my script parses and spits out something the management can read

Hi all I''m working on my modular recursive Makefile & svn-backed home for my Puppet manifests, custom functions, types, etc. So I''m trying to put together individual modules, test targets and so on. I have noticed that the $libdir (and probably the other configuration options too) sources from puppet.conf are not overridden by specifying --libdir=blah on the commmand line

Anyone know if it would be straightforward to extract this information from Puppet, probably in a custom function: The classes included as a result of the client''s parsed configuration - or - Am I in class X as a result of my parsed configuration? I''m thinking it would result in a more elegant manifest if classes X and Y behaved differently if they were both included compared

Hi. I''d like to use exception handling in my custom facts. For example, in plain Ruby: begin buildno = '''' bcrelease = open("/etc/BCrelease") while (line = bcrelease.gets) line = line.chomp buildno = $1 if line =~ /^Build:\s+(\d+)/ end bcrelease.close print "#{buildno}\n" rescue print "No

Maybe it works, maybe it doesn''t, but I sure as hell can''t make it work. I get stuck with "Could not find object(s)" whatever I do This is my module init.pp class ztest::setup { notice "MAIN SETUP CLASS" file { directfile: path => "/etc/directfile", owner => root, group => root, mode => 0644, content

I''ve been having great "fun" testing the new (Puppetised) build end-to-end for several days now. The majority of the fun has been coming from vendor packages (no names mentioned), typically with conflicting permissions on files, or perhaps different home directories, UIDs for the app users so it matters in which order you do things in. My current methodology is to go through

Hello, I''m scratching my head as to the best way to plug in a script to do some client configuration. The script is about 40 lines long (full of basic instructions to fiddle with VCS in fact). Lots of execs would seems cumbersome. My thoughts are to simply install this to the client (via the fileserver) and exec out to it. Does this seem sensible? And if so, be aware of things like