similar to: Broken sorting(?)

Thanks for the "junk at end" help. Now I'm having one more perplexing issue: When I sort a Dovecot mbox in Pine, the most recent messages tend to linger near the bottom of the message list, regardless of how they're sorted. Here's a snippet of the bottom of the list, sorted by arrival time: 448 2003-09-24 20:31 sprightly at e... Re: *hoopoe 449 2003-09-24

Hello, I've been working to migrate to dovecot (debian stable: 1:1.2.15-7) from courier (debian old-stable: 4.4.0-2). I've setup everything and migrated a test user over to the new system, and ran the courier-dovecot-migrate.pl script. The user is using alpine (the free version of pine) and their sort order changed on move to dovecot. Originally it was the default in alpine, which is to

Hi all, Is there a function to modify the fetch order of messages? We have just migrated from Courier to Dovecot and I notice that there is a slight difference in the way messages are fetched in Dovecot compared to Courier. Both Courier and Dovecot sort the mailbox correctly (UID SORT (REVERSE ARRIVAL) UTF-8 ALL), for example: [ 13:22:02.790 ]50800314 UID SORT (REVERSE ARRIVAL) UTF-8 ALL * SORT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a mail server CentOS 64bit (4 Gb RAM) with Dovecot 1.2a4 and three accounts. I use Thunderbird 2. If I enable SSL connection in Thunderbird 2, after three-five minutes I got a lot of different errors in Thunderbird (Server is not IMAP, Connection lost...). Everything comes back to normal if I restart Dovecot in the server, but after 5 minutes

My email workflow with Dovecot is that mail gets delivered to INBOX, where I handle it and then move it into a folder called archive. I have alpine set to use the Default sort of "THREAD" of a folder. After moving a (few) mail(s) from INBOX to archive, archive takes a long time (10-50s) to load while alpine tells me: [Sorting "archive" ... ] (I

Maybe this is just noise... but I can reproduce this fairly reliably. Mailbox with 21,000+ messages This query: a UID SORT RETURN (ALL COUNT) (DATE) UTF-8 SUBJECT "foo" is always about 10 percent slower than this split query (I've done this 4-5 times, and the numbers are similar): a UID SEARCH RETURN (SAVE) CHARSET UTF-8 SUBJECT "foo" b UID SORT RETURN (ALL COUNT)

Hi, ive come across what looks like a bug in how dovecot sorts the mail when sorting on subject. We noticed this on our current beta8 version, and I can also reproduce it in rc15. One of our customers has hundreds of emails with subjects like this: Subject: 20060823 Kanglaonline-NSCN(IM) cadres violating Tml truce: NSCN(K) Subject: 20060824 LSE - Shell jv denies 3.2 bln usd fraud claims by

As far as I can tell, when I ask Dovecot to sort an IMAP mailbox by the >From address, it ignores the part of the address after the '@'. So, for instance, mails from info at abc.org, info at xyz.org, and info at ghi.org are all mingled together in arrival order. Is there a way to change this? Thanks!

Hey alltogether, refacturing a package (before it will be released), I ran across the following problem. I have two directories with different text files, I want to read the first and construct a document-term matrix from it (every term=word in a row, every file in a column, occurrence frequencies form the values). The second directory contains different files. It needs to be read in to also

Hi all, When running rsync with following parameters, I get some strange output for a lot of paths. This does not happen on every path, but I see it often: rsync --stats --numeric-ids -lptgoD --files-from=/tmp/zkrsync/tmpUaSGa2 -r /data/.snapshots/backup/ rsync://osd010.gigalith:5555/zkrs-data 5: 5: 5: 5: 5: 5: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

In the code of functions 'order' and 'sort.list' in R 3.5.0 alpha (in https://svn.r-project.org/R/branches/R-3-5-branch/src/library/base/R/sort.R), in "fastpass, take advantage of ALTREP metadata", there is "try the reverse since that's easy too...". If it succeeds, ties are reordered, violating stability of sorting. Example: x <- sort(c(1, 1, 3)) x # 1

Hey .. maybe someone got a hint for me .. I''ve got a problem with the sorting of search results .. strangely enough, the sorting is fine on my mac development environment, but not okay on my linux live system. I got a field in my index called hierarchy. It contains long strings like: Living together > Family > Brother-In-Law Living together > Family > Marriage > Wife

Hi, Is there any way to find the permutation function of the sorting and to apply the function (or its inverse) elsewhere? For example, the following permutation function from the sorting in the matrix form is c(1,2,3), c(2,1,3) > sort(c("bc","ac","dd")) [1] "ac" "bc" "dd" I try to find it in the permutations/permute

Hi, > maybe this should not be here! does this have anything to do with LLVM? > int main() > { > try { > throw 34; > } > catch (int) { > } > catch (char) { > } > catch (bool) { > } > } The action is 0x5, this refers to 123 .byte 0x3 124 .byte 0x7d where 0x3 means that the typeinfo

Hi Peter, 2017-10-20 21:33 GMT+02:00 Peter Meissner <retep.meissner at gmail.com>: > Hey, > > I found this - for me - quite surprising and puzzling behaviour of split(). > > > split(1:11, as.character(1:11)) > split(1:11, 1:11) > > > When splitting by numerics everything works as expected - sorting of input > == sorting of output -- but when using a

Hello, I have a script in R language that makes sorting using the order() method of R language. What I need is to reimplement this method in any other language (PHP, Perl, Python, Java maybe). First I tried to reimplement it in php, here is some numbers that i need to sort: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,300,231,11,12,0,1 R language: n = c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,300,231,11,12,0,1) n [1] 1 2 3 4 5

Hey, I found this - for me - quite surprising and puzzling behaviour of split(). split(1:11, as.character(1:11)) split(1:11, 1:11) When splitting by numerics everything works as expected - sorting of input == sorting of output -- but when using a character vector everything gets re-sorted alphabetical. Although, there are some references in the help files to what happens when using split, I

Hi all, I''ve just added d&d sorting to a list where each item is a link_to .. Problem: when I drop an item to its new location, the browser think I clicked, and follows the link. Any idea? TIA. Alain

> On May 22, 2018, at 10:06 PM, John <miaojpm at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there any way to find the permutation function of the sorting and to > apply the function (or its inverse) elsewhere? > > For example, the following permutation function from the sorting in the > matrix form is > c(1,2,3), c(2,1,3) > >>

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2694 Bug ID: 2694 Summary: sftp ls command ignores sorting flags for globbed listing Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sftp