similar to: Run-time effects of new SIMD code

On 2024/07/17 15:47, Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users wrote: > Hi NSD developers, > > I've been following recent discussion and activity around building NSD 4.10, triggered?by build > failure in Homebrew. I see that you added some code to detect more things and adjust the build > based on what type of processor is detected. > > If one were to build NSD on an x86_64 CPU with

Hi Anand, Stuart, That is indeed correct. At runtime the CPUID instruction is used to detect which extensions are offered and it chooses based on that. When compiling on x86_64 with SSE4.2 and AVX2 enabled, the binary will actually contain 3 parsers, the most optimal one is used at runtime. Optimized versions can be disabled with --disable-westmere (SSE4.2) and --disable-haswell (AVX2) if

Hi Anand, Doing it with "nsd -v" is not implemented right now because it's meant to be transparent to users of the library, but I think you're right and it'd be good to show the info. The kernel is selected when the parse function is called. For NSD it makes sense to select one on startup and always use that one. There's a GH issue for that:

On 17/07/2024 16:57, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote: Hi Jeroen, > That is indeed correct. At runtime the CPUID instruction is used to > detect which extensions are offered and it chooses based on that. When > compiling on x86_64 with SSE4.2 and AVX2 enabled, the binary will > actually contain 3 parsers, the most optimal one is used at runtime. Thanks for this clarification. NSD doesn't

Thanks for the update Jeroen, and for creating the issues to track the suggestions. You didn't answer the parts of my email relating to what happens at compile time, and how the resulting NSD binary is affected depending on what architecture it's compiled on. If you could expand on those, I'd appreciate it. Regards, Anand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

hi, At least with a recent version if it is a time sync issue nsd will do a specific log msg that. Laura, can you send over the actual configuration? (maybe replacing the key with a placeholder or rotating the keys afterwards) It sounds strange if nsd checks tsig on the notify, but allow xfr without it. Regards, Tam?s May 16, 2024 16:14:59 Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users <nsd-users at

Hello I have this problem since a week or so: The nsd daemon crashes unexpectedly and the nsd log files shows this: [1200299533] nsd[3736]: info: XSTATS 1200299533 1200298484 RR=0 RNXD=0 RFwdR=0 RDupR=0 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=0 RAXFR=0 RLame=0 ROpts=0 SSysQ=0 SAns=40 SFwdQ=0 SDupQ=0 SErr=0 RQ=37 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=0 RDupQ=0 RTCP=0 SFwdR=0 SFail=30 SFErr=0 SNaAns=0 SNXD=0 RUQ=0 RURQ=0 RUXFR=0 RUUpd=1

Hi NSD developers, I submitted a merge request in Homebrew to update NSD to 4.10.0. The compile failed, and I don't know what the error means and how to fix it. Could one of you please take a look? https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/175796 Regards, Anand

NSD 4.10.0rc1 is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 ad476e82eee5bdabc985e071cabe6a68263dd02eac6278ce2f81798b8c08f19f pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.0rc1.tar.gz.asc Version 4.10.0 integrates simdzone and drops the Flex+Bison zone parser. NSD used a Flex+Bison based zone parser since version 1.4.0. The parser served NSD well, but zones have

On 04/12/2023 13:47, Jean-Christophe Boggio via nsd-users wrote: Hi Jean-Christophe, > When syncing between master and slaves, am I supposed to see new files > appear in the slave's "zonesdir" directory? Because, as you might > expect, I see nothing here. Is this behavior normal? From what I > understand, the slave "caches" the data in /var/lib/nsd/nsd.db

Hi there, I have a question about the "server-count" option. nsd.conf(5) simply states that it tells NSD to "start this many NSD servers", with no further commentary. Is there a situation where this value would ever be anything other than 1? Should it equal the number of available CPU cores? Cheers, -- Gavin Brown Chief Technology Officer CentralNic Ltd Innovative,

Hi Jean-Christophe, Anand's answer is entirely correct. Once 4.8.0 is released, zone files will be written once per hour by default. Best regards, Jeroen On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 10:48 +0100, Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users wrote: > On 04/12/2023 13:47, Jean-Christophe Boggio via nsd-users wrote: > > Hi Jean-Christophe, > > > When syncing between master and slaves, am I

Hi NSD developers, I have been experimenting with the "store-ixfr" feature in NSD. I have a configuration with: server: zonefiles-write: 0 pattern: store-ixfr: yes With this configuration, NSD transfers zones from a primary, and keeps them in RAM. When the zones are updated, it receives and stores the IXFR in RAM too. I can query NSD with the IXFR qtype, and it replies with

Hello! I use NSD 4.7.0 self compiled: Configure line: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man --infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --disable-option-checking --disable-silent-rules --libdir=${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu --runstatedir=/run --disable-maintainer-mode --disable-dependency-tracking

While SVCB/HTTPS provides a better solution for the browsing use case, I see other use cases where ALIAS/ANAME would be ideal, notably in apex RRs. So while fostering SVCB/HTTPS deployment is a good thing, I wouldn?t mind name server software implementing ALIAS. Including NSD, but I reckon it?s much more challenging to do due to NSD architecture than it was to implement it in PowerDNS. But if

Hi Jeroen, I just realised that the version I use is very old -- 4.1. So first what I should do -- updating it and only then come here , asking for clarification. ??, 27 ????. 2024??. ? 14:19, Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl>: > Hi Peter, > > NSD processes updates in batches. xfrd receives the [AI]XFR and > schedules a reload for the main process, which in turn forks

Hi Jean Claude, The message is printed when the bind operation failed. Why that happens is hard to say, I'd need more information for that. As the message does not say: address already in use (or similar), I'm guessing the address is not configured? Best regards, Jeroen On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 18:03 +0200, HAKIZIMANA Jean Claude via nsd-users wrote: > Dear nsd Users, > kindly can

On 3/20/23 13:41, Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users wrote: > Hi Robert, > > NSD doesn't understand the GENERATE directive. You'll have to create > your zone files using a script or template engine. Understood but certainly not helpful with large dynamic IPv6 PTR's... Not that dynamic hosts NEED PTR's, but would still be nice to have. -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP:

Dear NSD users, Here is the release candidate for NSD 3.2.15. This comes with ILNP support, NSD-RRL and different TSIG initialization (it fails if it can't find no suitable algorithms, instead of can't find 'one of the'). Plus some bugfixes. The NSD-RRL implementation is based on the work by Vixie and Schryver. However, because of the code-diversity argument that is at the basis

Hi Christof! AFAIK, PowerDNS is the only open source name server that supports ALIAS. There was an idea to standardize ALIAS as "ANAME" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-aname/), but the idea was dropped in favor of SVCB/HTTPS record https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9460/. So now we have to wait until all Browser vendors implement SVCB/HTTPS. Regards Klaus PS: If