similar to: [HELP] rsync recursive jumps across directories

The only explanation I can find for such behaviour is that incremental recursion is being used, which leads me to deduce that the lines with path outside of the directory "A/B/...", can only indicate folder creation. But yet I cannot buy this explanation because why would such "atypical folders" be created in the middle of the recursion "A/B/...", rather than together

Thanks for your message again. I appreciate your answers. I don't mind about the order of the files, and neither really about the order of the directories: I'm interested about whether rsync might transfer some files into a directory, then transfer some files into another which is outside of the first one, and then transfer more files into the first directory again. And with the --del

Thanks Kevin, but I don't understand your message, or at least how it answers my "real question" (last paragraph)... and by the way --delete defaults to --delete-during for current versions of rsync as far as I know... > rsync doesn't really give much control over the order it does things > in. If you want to control when the deletions happen there is only - >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is no guarantee that rsync will do anything in any order since it is going by the filesystem without any sorting. With --delete-during the directory indexing and therefore the deletions are running in parallel with file transfers. This means it is quite common for it to delete things in directories it isn't transferring files in. On Thu,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I don't believe the transferring part of rsync will jump around. It will transfer files it deems need it in the order it finds them which will be 1 dir at a time. Though when it enters a child dir that doesn't mean it is done with the parent dir. On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, bp25 at riseup.net wrote: > Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:16:02 +0000 >

Hi, I've followed the instructions on constructing recursive types ( http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#BuildRecType) and I can succesfully create simple recursive types using the C bindings (e.g. struct Test { struct Test *t };). I want to generalize this to get type information from my language into generated LLVM code. My language allows arbitrary forward type declarations that I

Hello, I always run rsync as follows: "sudo rsync -PaSHAXvi --del DIR1/ DIR2". I would think that whenever I see in the output of this rsync command a few lines of the form A/B/... and then further down in the output again a few lines of the form A/B/... (dots are dirs or files), then every line between such two lines is also of this form. I then discovered that this is incorrect

Uwe and Brian, Thanks for your attention to this one. We currently have the following array of atypical situations in our corporate installation: (1) Central install directory, where I neither have nor can reasonably want Administrator priviledges; (2) IT staff willing to maintain R officially but wants to leave *contributed* packages to user groups if at all possible; (3) Direct access from R

Has anyone started work on a ''top''-like tool that would show the current CPU and memory usage of domains? I''m thinking of writing something really simple in python, starting from listdoms.py, but want to make sure that someone else isn''t already there. Steve -- Stephen G. Traugott (KG6HDQ) UNIX/Linux Infrastructure Architect, TerraLuna LLC

Hey llvm-dev, What's the best method to test performance of Clang generated executables? Are the nightly tests in test-suite sufficient? I'm looking for publicly available tests/suites with a good breadth of coverage... Thanks, Cam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, I''ve been looking through the code and list archives but haven''t found this yet... From dom0, how do you cause a virtual domain to gracefully shutdown? It seems like the machinery is there somewhere, because the hypervisor can do it to dom0... For reference, in UML you do this by putting this in /etc/inittab: ca:12345:ctrlaltdel:/sbin/shutdown -h now ...and then

Hello there, since I installed CentOS6 few months ago (kept up-to-date using yum), I'm facing very poor performances when writing to USB pendrives. The hardware: a Dell Latitude E6500 laptop (Intel Core Duo P8600 @2.40Ghz), 4Go RAM + 4Go swap, several USB2 pendrives of various brands (less than old, all formatted as vfat). When I perform a copy (with cp or midnight commander, copying big

Are you using static linking, -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS, or -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB? On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:21 AM David Greene via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes: > > > I cannot reproduce this error, but this could be real. > > > > David, is this reproducible every time or is this flaky? > > It's

I think we need to think along two dimensions - Breadth of testing and depth of testing 1. Breadth: What the best supported ARM ISA versions in LLVM ARM? Say its armv6 and armv7; We need to - regression test ARM mode, Thumb-2 and Thumb-1 mode (armv6) - Performance/code-size test ARM mode, Thumb-2 and Thumb-1 modes We need to agree on an optimization level for regression as well as

We have a working setup of squid + samba + winbind to authenticate users belonging to the same domain (using NTLM). We have an immediate urgent requirement to support authentication against multiple Domains which are using their own Domain controller. There is NO Trust Relation between these Domain Controllers. I have searched through length and breadth of all available documents and

Full_Name: Doug Hershberger Version: 1.2.2 OS: Red Hat-Linux 7.0 Submission from: (NULL) (216.99.65.36) In the R FAQ I find the following entry explaining that R no longer has problems with memory. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#Why%20does%20R%20run%20out%20of%20of%20memory%3f However in my installation: R Version 1.2.2 (2001-02-26) Installed from the red hat RPM on your

Looks like Firefox may be getting another update soon, if my problem is not atypical. Prior to the latest, had NP for *months*. Anyone else seeing any problems? BTW, running the recent Java console from sun that was detailed in another thread a week or two back with Firefox. Had NP prior to the latest update, if that offers any useful info. Would like to test the openjdk for us if it's

On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote: > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of money to tend systems over new year's eve/day. I was working for an ISP at the time and got none of this. Nothing happened. I don't even recall

Hello, I was wondering whether or not some behaviour that I am seeing is expected behaviour and that it has been designed like this, or not. A dominator relation is given by "if A dominates B", then all paths to B go through A. For example, take the CFG below (which is a directed graph (couldn’t make the arrow heads but ok.): A / \ B C \ / D | E We can construct

First time here, so I hope this isn''t a FAQ (although I did check *the* faq). I''m using mongrel_cluster with --prefix, and it is very slick. Thanks for that. But I had one problem. At one point in my little app, I have something like this: image_tag(url_for(:action => ''picture'', :id => 1), :size => "160x200") In this scenario,