Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Dovecot, LVS and the issues I have with it."
2004 Nov 05
8
Using Shorewall + Linux Virtual Server LVS/DR
I''m havign a HUGE amount of difficulty getting shoreline to work with LVS.
We use it here constantly so we know it works. The problem is packets come
in, get directed to a webserver, webserver returns the packet to firewall,
and then it goes into a black hole. rp_filter is off globally on all
interfaces. LVS seems to be working right....
I use shorewall tcrules to mark packets on
2006 Dec 22
1
IPVS connections not removed
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font color="#000000">Hi centos users,<br>
<br>
2013 Jul 22
2
FreeBSD LVS replacement
Hello,
I'm looking for a functional FreeBSD replacement of the Linux LVS software?
There is an LVS port for FreeBSD but it looks deat since 2005. Is there anything comparable or better?
All best,
mjb
2009 Mar 25
2
Monitoring IP masquerading on LVS load-balancing
I've got small numbers of connections moving through a load balancer
configured in NAT mode. So I've got an iptables table called "nat", which
has in it a line "-A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE" (lan connect is
eth0, private lan inside the cluster is eth1).
The load balancer is working; connections made to the virtual ip on that
host do get routed to one of the
2010 Jan 08
7
Apache/Cluster issue -- Single public IP address
I want to set up a cluster that is used for web hosting (RHCS cluster). Recently,
I experimented with a 2 node cluster and was able to run it successfully. However,
I have started facing some issues with Apache, which I had configured as a service
using the Cluster configuration tool. To do this Apache needs a floating IP address.
This address is in addition to the network interface IP address.
2008 Apr 04
2
simple load balancing/failover for OWA
We are building an exchange cluster with two front end Outlook Web
Access servers. We would like to at least have some sort of failover,
and prefereably load balancing for them.
The MS recommended way is to use NLB, but for various reasons that's not
working with our set up.
We are looking to set up a single linux server and use something like
LVS to load balance/fail over the
2008 Jan 08
8
Shorewall and LVS-NAT (via fwmark) nat'd machines can't access the outside world directly
Hi guys,
I''m not sure where to post for help on this one, shorewall or lvs, I''ll
start with shorewall (only cause Tom is a gun at this stuff, and is polite
enough to tell me to bugger off to the LVS list if I''m posting in the wrong
one ;)
I have a single box that is my router/firewall/LVS.
Internet -- eth0 - router/firewall - eth1 --- internal lan
|
eth2
2007 Jan 15
1
piranha lvsd "cluster" status: how?
Hi,
I've got a couple of machines acting as directors with service=lvs
Is there something similar to 'clustat' for pulse+lvsd?
I need this in order to make our monitorization scripts "cluster-aware",
or else one node will have critical status when there are less nannies
than it expected because the services ran over to the other node.
Thanks in advance,
Rui
--
+ No
2006 Mar 17
1
Re: DUNDi .... Halfway and CLUSTERING
Do you mean the peristence of connecting a specific phone to a specific
server? If so, then it's relatively easy. The ldirectord has a persistence
setting that does that. If I'm misunderstanding you, then could you explain
further what you mean?
Regards,
- Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On
2008 Jan 03
3
anyone care to point me in the right direction? LVS
i'm trying to setup LVS, and tried both the lvs-dr and the lvs-nat,
but can't get any to work.
I'm hoping people here can answer a few questions that might help and
shed light onto the situation?
#1 with regards to the Real Servers, is there anything that needs to
be configured other that the http service? I ask this, because I
suspect yes, and it has to do with what type of LVS you
2011 Mar 08
2
keepalived+LVS
hello,
all!
if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ?
tks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110308/b8e27203/attachment-0002.html>
2015 Nov 10
2
[PATCH] daemon: lvm: Only return public LVs from guestfs_lvs API (RHBZ#1278878).
When a disk image uses LVM thinp (thin provisioning), the guestfs_lvs
API would return the thinp pools. This confused other APIs because
thinp pools don't have corresponding /dev/VG/LV device nodes.
Filter the LVs that are returned using "lv_role=public".
Thanks: Fabian Deutsch
---
daemon/lvm.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/daemon/lvm.c
2009 Nov 09
1
File "lvs.ml", line 11... : Error: Unbound value Guestfs.create
On F12, I'm getting this build failure:
ocamlfind ocamlopt -ccopt '-L ../../src/.libs' \
-warn-error A -I .. mlguestfs.cmxa lvs.ml -o lvs
File "lvs.ml", line 11, characters 10-24:
Error: Unbound value Guestfs.create
make[2]: *** [lvs] Error 2
Admittedly with STREQ-related changes, but they seem unrelated...
2015 Jan 28
1
Re: [PATCH 3/3] sparsify: Ignore read-only LVs (RHBZ#1185561).
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:25:38 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> ---
> sparsify/copying.ml | 4 +++-
> sparsify/in_place.ml | 4 +++-
> sparsify/utils.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sparsify/copying.ml b/sparsify/copying.ml
> index 8d77964..165dd6e 100644
> --- a/sparsify/copying.ml
> +++
2012 Oct 23
1
masq rules for LVS
Hi,
I need some special masq rules to allow internal servers to resolve public IP''s which are loadbalanced by LVS - the rule are:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -m ipvs --vaddr <LVS PUBLIC IP>/32 --vport 80 -j SNAT --to-source <LVS INTERNAL IP>
Also I need to enable:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs/conntrack
Currently I do all this from /etc/shorewall/started - but is
2010 Feb 17
1
Load Balancer (heartbeat, ldirectord, ipvsadm) + Apache Problem
Hi,
I'm having this problem with load balancer.
I already setup the load balancer and two servers behind it with this kind
of topology
-----------------------------------------------------
request -> DIRECTOR -- Server 1
\
Server 2
-----------------------------------------------------
DIRECTOR's (RHEL 5) Virtual
2009 Oct 04
1
FYI, lvs.ml: Unbound value Guestfs.create
FYI, while "make" succeeded in this directory on Friday,
I ran "make clean" today from the top, then "make" and got this:
Making all in examples
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/j/w/co/libguestfs/ocaml/examples'
ocamlfind ocamlopt \
-warn-error A -I .. mlguestfs.cmxa lvs.ml -o lvs
File "lvs.ml", line 11, characters 10-24:
Error:
2008 Sep 25
1
Implementing LVS changes made in Piranha GUI
Every time I touch something, pieces fall off! It's a good thing this
stuff isn't in production yet (for me I mean).
So I had an LVS, configured with Piranha, directing http test transactions
across two servers. I used Piranha to add another realserver. It
appeared in the lvs.cf file, but didn't appear in the ipvsadm output. So
I stopped and restarted Pulse. And now *none* of the
2001 Nov 06
2
2.2.14 integration with lvs
Hi,
I had to modify 2 files to integrate ext3 patch with lvs patch..
(ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p8.gz and ipvs 0.8.2)
--- drivers/block/loop.c.orig Tue Nov 6 10:13:48 2001
+++ drivers/block/loop.c Tue Nov 6 10:17:55 2001
@@ -218,14 +218,16 @@ static int lo_send(struct loop_device *l
index++;
pos += size;
UnlockPage(page);
-
2006 Mar 06
7
LVS-DR + Shorewall Upgrade 3.0.2 -> 3.0.4 => Trouble
Hello,
after upgrading Shorewall (see subject) and Gentoo-Linux (from Kernel 2.6.12
to 2.6.15, both with Gentoo patches, e.g. not Vanilla) the firewall on our
load balancer rejects HTTP packets for the VIP with
>Mar 5 23:22:51 balance Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0
>SRC=XX.XXX.XXX.XXX >DST=XXX.XXX.XXX. XXX LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=114
>ID=26421 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=2025