similar to: Squat memory usage

Hello, It looks I encoutered a bug or misconfiguration. fts_squat search for subject and body works excellent for English mails. For non-English (in particular, Russian) it works only when query consists of 1 word. Phrases - 2 and more words - always returns nothing. Example: search for "planet" ("???????") returns results, search for "Earth" ("?????") also

Hi Timo, Just tried squat in beta11. I also get the same error in the log: dovecot: Dec 10 14:21:17 Error: IMAP(joewong99:joew.outblaze.com): Corrupted squat uidlist file /mailfs/4/22/3/joewon g99:joew.outblaze.com at joew_outblaze_com/Maildir/dovecot.index.search.uids: Broken uidlists There is not change in my configuration file. # 1.1.beta11: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf log_path:

I don't know if this was supposed to have changed with dovecot2, but http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS shows fts = squat solr so, since I have the lucene plugin?"fts = lucene" works by itself?I tried fts = squat lucene but: $ doveadm index '*' doveadm(dave): Error: fts: Failed to initialize backend 'squat lucene': Unknown backend So, is that syntax

Hi all, ive been playing with squat indexes. Up to about 300.000 emails in a single mailbox this was working flawlessly. The search index file is about 500MB at that time. Ive now added some more emails, and at 450.000 or so emails im seeing a serious problem with squat index creation. It takes...f o r e v e r . The .tmp file is being so slowly, it will probably take 2-3 hours to create. Upto

It seems, that dovecot-shared ignored by fts squat and dovecot.index.search/dovecot.index.search.uids created with wrong permissions. This makes squat unusable with symlinked shared maildirs. -- WBR, Anton Yuzhaninov

As described earlier (http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-December/018055.html), Dovecot nowadays has full text search indexing support in CVS HEAD. Currently there are two backends: Lucene and Squat. Lucene's problem is that standard IMAP SEARCH command can't be used with it without breaking IMAP RFC. So Lucene can be used only with non-standard X-BODY-FAST and X-TEXT-FAST search

Hi, I'm running Dovecot 1.2.17 for serving mail via IMAP as well as for providing access to a mailing list archive. The archive is implemented as a public read-only mailbox with per-user index files (i.e. the \Seen flags are per-user). I recently enbled the Squat plugin to accelerate searches in the message bodies and noticed that every user (I'm using a virtual user setup) gets his

Hi Timo and All, after upgrading to 2.1.2 i'm getting a lot of these messages: Error: Corrupted squat uidlist file XXXXXX wrong indexid I did not have them before. Ideas? Luca

There are now two full text search backends in CVS HEAD: - squat: My own full text search index based on ideas from Cyrus Squat indexes. Supports substring searches. - lucene: Uses CLucene library. It should be pretty easy to add support for more backends. As I've explained a couple of times already, IMAP RFC says that searches are done by matching substrings, so the Lucene backend

Guys, We have a very large maildir for email auditing purposes. It's currently at 600 GB and continues to grow. Can dovecot handle this with squat indexing, or am I out of my mind? Thanks! John

I tried Squat indexing on my very small home system and when I did a body search in Thunderbird, I got a TON, and I mean TON, of these messages in my log file: Mar 6 06:13:31 apple dovecot: child 14142 (imap) killed with signal 6 Mar 6 06:13:31 apple dovecot: IMAP(jeff): file file-lock.c: line 112: unreached Mar 6 06:13:31 apple dovecot: IMAP(jeff): Raw backtrace: imap [0x482771] ->

Hi! I'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Wheezy 32-bit (package version is 1:2.1.7-7+deb7u1) with maildirs. My problem is that the incremental indexing of maildirs with squat takes a very long time... I don't know if it reindexes anything, but it seems it iterates though all messages on each search query and reads them. It works fast only on successive queries within several minutes,

While using 1.1.13 and squat with local pine imap on Solaris 9 I had a random core dump today. I was doing a search in a maildir folder with about 2000 emails. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to reproduce it yet, but I wanted to send along the info anyways. Environment: # uname -a SunOS 5.9 Generic_122300-39 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 Backtrace: http://pastebin.com/f7aa8bb5 ~#

Hello Timo, I have installed 1.1 beta 8 with fts-squat enabled. I have added the plugin section in dovecot.conf. How can I actually make use of the full text index? Regards, - Joe

Hello folks, I use dovecot squat for indexing. I use to have fts_squat = partial=4 full=4 But i change to fts_squat = partial=4 full=8 My question is, do i need to delete older indexes to have it consistenly, or dovecot is able "update" the indexes or it sees that it is broken and rebuild it all? Other question, is there an comand line to update the indexes ? Thanks a lot!

Hi Timo, Here is the backtrace for your reference. I have already applied dovecot-97702c9c4111 changes to my 1.1 beta10 code base. I am running dovecot on FC7, gcc 4.1.2, mailbox is on NFS. Whenever I did UID SEARCH body "xxxx" imap crashes. Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. #0 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) bt full #0 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall () No

Hi Im using dovecot 1.2.16 with Solr setup for FTS. When searching a single field such as subject Dovecot will use the solr index. When searching multiple fields such as subject and body it does not use the index and uses the standard built in search which takes much longer. Is there any way to get Dovecot to use the solr or squat index when searching multiple fields? -- View this message in

Hi, I'm running Dovecot 2.1.12 on FreeBSD. I configured Dovecot to use the Squat plugin to provide faster full-text searches. The output of 'dovecot -n' is attached to this mail. However, I just noticed that this plugin doesn't seem to kick in. A raw telnet session seems to confirm this: [..] . SEARCH BODY abcdefg * OK Searched 57% of the mailbox, ETA 0:06 * SEARCH 3425 6254

I was writing this to beta9 announcement, but it grew so huge that I guess a separate mail is better. :) I've spent quite a lot of time this last week redesigning/rewriting Squat indexer. I think the redesign is good enough now that I'll just replace the existing squat with this new one in next release. I don't think many people are using the old squat, and there are also some bugs in

Hi, While compiling 1.8.8.1, I met the following error: [AR] hash/hash.o hash/hash_bigkey.o hash/hash_buf.o hash/hash_func.o hash/hash_log2.o hash/hash_page.o hash/ndbm.o btree/bt_close.o btree/bt_conv.o btree/bt_debug.o btree/bt_delete.o btree/bt_get.o btree/bt_open.o btree/bt_overflow.o btree/bt_page.o btree/bt_put.o btree/bt_search.o btree/bt_seq.o btree/bt_split.o btree/bt_utils.o db/db.o