similar to: Public mailboxes configuration to receive mails

Christopher and the list: Gee... I wish it would! My probelm currently is the fact that if I add this line to /etc/exports: /mnt/MountedSambaShare somebox(nohide) I get: somebox:/mnt/MountesSambaShare: Invalid argument This happens whether /etc/exports says "somebox(nohide)" or "somebox(ro)" or "somebox()". Note that /mnt/MounteSambaShare is in fact

Hi Greetings. I have windows server2012R2  and installed Hypervisor  I have installed Ubuntu 16.04 server edition in Virtual machine(hyper-v 2012r2)  Postfix and dovecot are running  dovecot version :2.2.22 (fe789dz)  Able to send mail is ok. mail received in /var/mail/%u  could not receive mail from client Thunderbird.

Dear All, is it possible to temporarily reject mails, when quota of public namespace subfolder is exceeded? I'd check folder size with a cronjob. Dovecot is using a system user, so I guess blocking post and insert in ACL isn't a solution? I don't want to set the folder to read-only, that users can still delete mails. Thank you in advance. - Chris

The make seems to go okay. [root@somebox asterisk-1.2.7.1]# uname -a Linux somebox.org 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5smp #1 SMP i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux mkdir -p /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/digits mkdir -p /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/priv-callerintros for x in sounds/digits/*.gsm; do \ if grep -q "^%`basename $x`%" sounds.txt; then \ install -m 644 $x

Anyone have experience with exporting to other Linux boxes a Windows share mounted on one Linux box? I have successfully mounted the Windows share on the Linux server box, but when I edit /etc/exports to include the new mount and run exportfs, I get error messages regarding the new export. For example, if I add this line to /etc/exports: /mnt/windows_share somebox(rw) I will get the

Hi I recently (about 2 weeks ago) moved over my users over to a new version of dovecot (2.0.9) and now the memory usage on the new server seems much higher than it was before. The new server is a CentOS 6 VM with 4 GB of RAM and 4 CPUs and according to top, it's used up all of the RAM and all of the Swap. Here's a sample of the output from top (sorted by allocated memory). top -

Hi all, We have been running Dovecot for over a year now in our moderate volume mail environment (>4000 mailboxes) and it's been running great. However, over the past month or so we've begun to experience issues where IMAP clients will appear to "hang" for a period of time, we then see a sig 11, and afterwards mailflow returns to normal. This usually happens a few times a

I enabled the trash plugin yesterday, adding "trash" to mail_plugins, and configuring the plugin setting "trash = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-trash.conf.ext". But I still see users with lots of files in INBOX.Trash getting bounced because of quota exceeded: postfix/lmtp[26273]:: C89F490061: to=<XXXXXXXXXXXXX at example.no>, relay=loadbalancers.example.net[192.168.42.15]:24,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3465 Summary: --files-from does not --delete Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: michael.w.grenier@lmco.com

Hi all, from much of the documentation I''ve seen, the advice is to set readonly=on on volumes on the receiving side during send/receive operations. Is this still a requirement? I''ve been trying the send/receive while NOT setting the receiver to readonly and haven''t seen any problems even though we''re traversing and ls''ing the dirs within the receiving

Hello, Here is a 'me too' somewhat like: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-January/010759.html Example scenario: /u/username/Mail/subfolder/somebox subfolder is a directory somebox is a mbox When I use Thunderbird's "Delete folder" function on the somebox the message appears: "Target mailbox doesn't allow inferiour mailboxes". Thunderbird, by

Hi, I have an asterisk connected with PRI (Zap channels). If I try to call a number, and recieve cause code 27 because the line 553192 is out of service, but the call continue...is it ok? Here the console messages -- Executing [98 at TRONCAL-PRI-76:5] Dial("Zap/1-1", "Zap/g1/553192") in new stack -- Requested transfer capability: 0x00 - SPEECH -- Called g1/553192

Hello. I'm having some weird problem with (probably) mailbox_list_index, that it doesn't see new mail in mailboxes. I'm using 2.2.4 over imap and ssh/imap, and after a while dovecot stops noticing new mail in some folders. Its always the same 2-3 folders of about 30. I read something about list-index corruption in 2.2.2, and i thought it was that i was running into earlier, but this

On 1 Oct 2019, at 16.31, Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > I set up system copying all mails to a backup system. > > This used to work without a hitch - now in the last few days mails > would pile up in the Postfix Queue, waiting to be delivered using the > lmtp transport into dovecot. > > So dovecot was being slow, but why? After

* Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > But why is that? Why would the index file be updated so often? BTW: This post is a followup to my "2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?" post from back in July.

* Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com>: > > BTW: This post is a followup to my "2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?" post from back in July. > > Fixed by https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/5e9e09a041b318025fd52db2df25052b60d0fc98 and will be in the soon-to-be-released v2.3.8. I stopped 2.3.7, copied over the index files from the ramdisk into the physical "realm"

> On 16/10/2019 13:31 Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > * Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > * Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com>: > > > > > > BTW: This post is a followup to my "2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?" post from back in July. > > > > > > Fixed by

zfs receive should allow option to disable immediately mount of received filesystem. In case of original filesystem have changed mountpoints, it''s hard to make clone fs with send-receive, because received filesystem immediately try to mount to old mountpoint, that locked by sourcr fs. In case of different host mountpoint can be locked by unrelated filesystem. Can anybody recommend a

* Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > * Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com>: > > > > BTW: This post is a followup to my "2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?" post from back in July. > > > > Fixed by https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/5e9e09a041b318025fd52db2df25052b60d0fc98 and will be in the soon-to-be-released v2.3.8. > > I

On 1 Oct 2019, at 16.45, Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > * Ralf Hildebrandt via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > >> But why is that? Why would the index file be updated so often? > > BTW: This post is a followup to my "2.3.7 slower than 2.3.6?" post from back in July. Fixed by