similar to: libsamba-policy.cpython: where it is used in samba?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "libsamba-policy.cpython: where it is used in samba?"

2024 Jun 29
1
libsamba-policy.cpython: where it is used in samba?
26.05.2024 13:13, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 14:25 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I'm trying to find where various components of samba belongs to and where they're used. >> There are quite a few files with unknown purpose. For example, a cpython library >> (python code which is to be linked to from a C program)
2019 Apr 11
2
disjointed namespaces with samba working?
Hi, is it possible to use a so called disjointed namespaces without having to "fake" the hosts fqdn giving it the AD-name as hostname? Background: We have a unix and a Windows world and each runs below it's domain. Let's say UNIX-DOMAIN and WIN-DOMAIN. When there is the need to bring the two worlds together the first choice is to use samba4 on unix joined to the AD domain name
2019 Apr 11
3
compile samba 4.10.2 centos 7.6
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:43 AM Gabriel O. Franca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Good morning people, > > I am opening my lab with version 4.10.2 in centos 7.6. > I'm trying to compile using python3 without success. > Has anyone managed to compile using python3 in the centos 7.6 that might > give way to the stones? > Here is the error message
2018 Aug 23
2
Plans for buster
Hans van Kranenburg writes ("Re: Plans for buster"): > This can be done from tag debian/4.11.1_pre+1.733450b39b-1_exp1 (which > is right now the same as the master branch). Thanks for doing all this work. I have just sent it to experimental. I did some reviewing and diffing. I have some comments, or, at least, things I noticed. None of them were IMO blockers for experimental.
2009 Mar 26
0
[LLVMdev] OT: Python on LLVM
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Paul Melis <llvm at assumetheposition.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > Slightly off-topic (as it's not directly about using or developing LLVM): > > http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan > > "Our long-term proposal is to replace CPython's custom virtual machine > with a JIT built on top of LLVM, while leaving the
2009 May 26
3
[LLVMdev] Wondering how best to run inlining on a single function.
In Unladen Swallow we (intend to) compile each function as we determine it's hot. To "compile" a function means to translate it from CPython bytecode to LLVM IR, optimize the IR using a FunctionPassManager, and JIT the IR to machine code. We'd like to include inlining among our optimizations. Currently the Inliner is a CallGraphSCCPass, which can only be run by the
2020 Nov 11
2
./configure --with-php7 fails silently
Apparently there is a php 7.4 configuration missing.? This is bindings 1.4.17 running on a Mint 20 system. I see this in the config output: cpython-38.opt-1.pyc checking for php-config7.3... no checking for php-config7.2... no checking for php-config7.1... no checking for php-config7.0... no checking for php-config... no It didn't look for 7.4. Thanks, Jim.
2012 Dec 30
1
Does dlltools in 64-bit rtools for windows support 64-bit machine type?
Hi, I've been trying to get the python bridge (rpy2) to build for 64-bit R and python. The current stumbling block is that mingw can't use the python27.lib file that comes with CPython and so I need to generate libpython27.a. When I use dlltool from rtools to do that however, I end up with a 32-bit file: >"G:\Rtools\gcc-4.6.3\i686-w64-mingw32\bin\dlltool" -e libpython27.a
2024 May 25
1
classifying samba componens and sorting into debian binary packages
Hi! I'm evaluating how various binaries and components are split into different binary packages in Debian. And am having issues classifying these. Initially there has been request to remove dependency on python3-samba package (this is AD-related stuff) from samba-the-file-server package, to be able to use it on smaller devices. And at the same time, there has been another request to move
2020 Mar 16
3
GSOC Projects
Hey, I am Swapnil Raj I am student in Trinity College Dublin and I am interested in working on LLVM. I am really interested in two projects listed, the first one is the extending the clang AST with template information and the second is finding smart null pointer dereferences. I am passionate about compilers and interpreters, I have written a few small language based on lambda calculus. I am
2024 Jun 07
1
smbstatus: who opened the file?
In the smbstatus output, "Locked files" section, there's a list of locked files (effectively opened files, since windows always locks a file which it opens) and corresponding pid of smbd process. How to map this information to user ID? Thanks, /mjt -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24. New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E 9D8B E14E 3F2A 9DD7 9199 28F1
2009 Mar 26
3
[LLVMdev] OT: Python on LLVM
Hi, Slightly off-topic (as it's not directly about using or developing LLVM): http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan "Our long-term proposal is to replace CPython's custom virtual machine with a JIT built on top of LLVM, while leaving the rest of the Python runtime relatively intact." Just curious, has anyone here heard more about this project? Regards,
2019 Apr 04
2
Unable to verify of llvm sources with the .sig files
With the new signature file I was able to verify, but there was still a bad signature: "gpg: key 0x0FC3042E345AD05D: 1 bad signature" which I highlighted below. Didn't seem to be a problem, but thought I'd point it out. I'd be glad to do additional tests if you'd like. $ gpg --list-keys /home/wink/.gnupg/pubring.kbx ----------------------------- pub
2009 May 27
0
[LLVMdev] Wondering how best to run inlining on a single function.
On May 26, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > In Unladen Swallow we (intend to) compile each function as we > determine it's hot. To "compile" a function means to translate it from > CPython bytecode to LLVM IR, optimize the IR using a > FunctionPassManager, and JIT the IR to machine code. We'd like to > include inlining among our optimizations. Currently
2024 May 31
1
maximum samba AD functional level?
Hi! In the samba wiki there's this page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels which basically says that the maximum supported functional level is 2008_R2, and that 2012 (and 2012_R2) are included but not supported. This page mentions maximum samba version 4.4 and has been modified in 2017 (besides some formatting changes). What's the current situation? Also,
2024 Jun 07
1
missing msdfs referrals from samba directory listing: wrong order in smbd_dirptr_get_entry()?
06.06.2024 19:33, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > For quite some time I'm trying to find what's going on with MSDFS referrals. > Samba version is 4.19.6. .. > However, when opening the directory in question from client, this name is not > shown in the listing.? Samba skips this name from the listing when looping over > readdir entries: So, the same config just works in
2024 Jun 07
1
DC upgraded to 4.20.1 - issues
07.06.2024 09:39, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > I run 2 DCs at a site, Debian 12.5, so far samba-4.19.6 from backports. > > Today I upgraded one of them, this brought samba-4.20.1 > > Now on this one DC stuff like "wbinfo -g" fails: > > # wbinfo -g > could not obtain winbind interface details: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE > could not obtain
2024 Jun 07
2
4.20: case (in)sensitive is broken
Hi! This is a heads-up for now, more debugging to follow. I had to downgrade samba from 4.20.1 to 4.19.6 because 4.20 broke case insensitive file access entirely. Only exact case filename works, no matter which value is set in "case sensitive" parameter. In 4.19, things works again. /mjt -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24. New key:
2024 Jun 07
1
4.20: case (in)sensitive is broken
07.06.2024 19:27, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 04:59:29PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> It boils down to having wide links = yes (and unix extensions = no). > > Wide links is problematic. I'd love to just remove it :-). I don't see anything problematic in wide links. I'd say it's samba who views it as problematic (just like in a
2024 Jun 10
0
mjt debian/ubuntu samba builds update
Hi! I just uploaded binaries of samba versions 4.19.7-1 and 4.20.1-5 for ubuntu and debian to the usual location, http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ . There are a few changes in there. First, I changed debian release suffix to be like: 4.20.1+dfsg-5~mjt-deb11 4.20.1+dfsg-5~mjt-ubt24 This should not change anything, just make it easier to track if neded, hopefully. And for 4.20