similar to: After restoring the failed host and synchronizing the data, it prompts that there are unsynchronized items

On 09/29/2017 09:30 PM, rick sanchez wrote: > I am trying to get up geo replication between two gluster volumes > > I have set up two replica 2 arbiter 1 volumes with 9 bricks > > [root at gfs1 ~]# gluster volume info > Volume Name: gfsvol > Type: Distributed-Replicate > Volume ID: c2fb4365-480b-4d37-8c7d-c3046bca7306 > Status: Started > Snapshot Count: 0 > Number

I am trying to get up geo replication between two gluster volumes I have set up two replica 2 arbiter 1 volumes with 9 bricks [root at gfs1 ~]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gfsvol Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: c2fb4365-480b-4d37-8c7d-c3046bca7306 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 3 x (2 + 1) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: gfs2:/gfs/brick1/gv0 Brick2:

The mount log file of the volume would help in debugging the actual cause. On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Joel Diaz <mrjoeldiaz at gmail.com> wrote: > Good morning Gluster users, > > I'm very new to the Gluster file system. My apologies if this is not the > correct way to seek assistance. However, I would appreciate some insight > into understanding the issue I have.

Good morning Gluster users, I'm very new to the Gluster file system. My apologies if this is not the correct way to seek assistance. However, I would appreciate some insight into understanding the issue I have. I have three nodes running two volumes, engine and data. The third node is the arbiter on both volumes. Both volumes were operation fine but one of the volumes, data, no longer

Hi list, I am using a replica volume (3 nodes) gluster in an ovirt environment and after setting one node in maintenance mode and rebooting it, the "Online" flag in gluster volume status does not go to "Y" again. [root at node1 glusterfs]# gluster volume status Status of volume: my_volume Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid

Hi, everyone: We have a glusterfs clusters, version is 3.2.7. The volume info is as below: Volume Name: gfs1 Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 94 x 3 = 282 Transport-type: tcp We native mount the volume in all nodes. When we access the file ?/XMTEXT/gfs1_000/000/000/095? on one nodes, the error is split brain. While we can access the same file on

I have 4 dell 2970 server , three server harddisk is 146Gx6 ,one hard disk is 72Gx6: each server mount info is /dev/sda4 on /exp1 type xfs (rw) /dev/sdb1 on /exp2 type xfs (rw) /dev/sdc1 on /exp3 type xfs (rw) /dev/sdd1 on /exp4 type xfs (rw) /dev/sde1 on /exp5 type xfs (rw) /dev/sdf1 on /exp6 type xfs (rw) I create a gluster volume have 4 stripe gluster volume create test-volume3 stripe 4

Is there a way to specify on a per-object basis that Puppet should merely report that an object needs to be updated without actually performing the update? This would make it possible to detect changes to critical objects (e.g. config files) that Puppet shouldn''t try to fix automaticaly. -- Jos Backus jos at catnook.com

Replying and adding gluster-users. That seems more appropriate? ________________________________________ From: gluster-devel-bounces+jwalker=gluster.com at nongnu.org [gluster-devel-bounces+jwalker=gluster.com at nongnu.org] on behalf of Emmanuel Dreyfus [manu at netbsd.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 6:51 AM To: gluster-devel at nongnu.org Subject: [Gluster-devel] volume rebalance still broken

hello hpa, rebased my branch, please pull latest git pull git://brane.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/klibc.git maks for the following shortlog maximilian attems (6): fstype: add squashfs v3 support reiser4_fs.h: add attribute packed to reiser4_master_sb fstype: add ext4 support .gitignore: add subdir specific entries usr/klibc/Kbuild: beautify klibc build fstype:

Hi, I have simple installation, using mostly defaults, of two mirrored servers. One brick, one volume. GlusterFS version is 3.12.1 (server and client). All hosts involved are Debian 9.1. On another host I have mounted two different directories from the cluster using /etc/fstab: gfs1,gfs2:/vol1/sites-available/ws0 /etc/nginx/sites-available glusterfs defaults,_netdev 0 0 and

I just built a pair of AWS Red Hat 6.5 instances to create a gluster replicated pair file system. I can install everything, peer probe, and create the volume, but as soon as I try to start the volume, glusterd dumps core. The tail of the log after the crash: +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ [2014-04-28 21:49:18.102981] I

We have done some benchmarking tests using dovecot 2.0.12 to find the best shared filesystem for hosting many users, here I share with you the results, notice the bad perfomance of all the shared filesystems against the local storage. Is there any specific optimization/tunning on dovecot for use GFS2 on rhel6??, we have configured the director to make the user mailbox persistent in a node, we will

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The IMAP servers included with all versions of Red Hat Linux have a buffer overrun which allow *remote* users to gain root access on systems which run them. A fix for Red Hat 4.1 is now avaialble (details on it at the end of this note). Users of Red Hat 4.0 should apply the Red Hat 4.1 fix. Users of previous releases of Red Hat Linux are strongly encouraged to

Hi David, Also consider using the mount option to specify backup server via 'backupvolfile-server=server2:server3' (you can define more but I don't thing replica volumes greater that 3 are usefull (maybe in some special cases). In such way, when the primary is lost, your client can reach a backup one without disruption. P.S.: Client may 'hang' - if the primary server got

Hi to all in the list, we are trying to do some tests lab for a large scale mail system having this requirements: - Scale to maybe 1million users(Only for testing). - Server side filters. - User quotas. - High concurrency. - High performance and High Availability. We plan to test this using RHEL5 and maybe RHEL6. As a storage we are going to use an HP EVA 8400 FC(8 GB/s) We defined this

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >Some time ago I had SELinux problems with Fail2ban. >Unfortunately when I install [...] from EPEL, I still get the same error. EPEL packages are often crap quality (as packages), merely blind imports of the upstream package without any adjustments needed for the RHEL/CentOS environment (sometimes not even for Fedora), which is often somewhat

Hi David, On Dec 24, 2019 02:47, David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > In testing we found that actually the GFS client having access to all 3 nodes made no difference to performance. Perhaps that's because the 3rd node that wasn't accessible from the client before was the arbiter node? It makes sense, as no data is being generated towards

I'm developing an application that have a video conference component. For that I need echo cancellation, and is looking around for algorithms/implementations of that, and the one in speex is an alternative. In the documentation for speex I find the following sentence however. "Using a different soundcard to do the capture and plaback will *not* work, regardless of what you may

Hi all, We have been fighting with telco for a entire week. Today they came here with a LITE3000 to analyze what is going on. When I configure zaptel with no external clock, E1 gets aligned/synchronized with bit rate in 2048000 bps, both me and telco. span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 But when I configure span4 to get clock source from telco they become unsynchronized. TElco bit rate stays in