similar to: debian backports 4.20.1

I run 2 DCs at a site, Debian 12.5, so far samba-4.19.6 from backports. Today I upgraded one of them, this brought samba-4.20.1 Now on this one DC stuff like "wbinfo -g" fails: # wbinfo -g could not obtain winbind interface details: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE could not obtain winbind domain name! failed to call wbcListGroups: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE Error looking up domain

07.06.2024 09:39, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > I run 2 DCs at a site, Debian 12.5, so far samba-4.19.6 from backports. > > Today I upgraded one of them, this brought samba-4.20.1 > > Now on this one DC stuff like "wbinfo -g" fails: > > # wbinfo -g > could not obtain winbind interface details: WBC_ERR_WINBIND_NOT_AVAILABLE > could not obtain

11.03.2024 17:40, spindles seven via samba: > Hi > > After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the

Well, the backports.org people finally installed my backport of the latest stable version of dovecot. Please remove the Braincells apt source form /etc/apt/sources.list and add these lines instead. deb http://www.backports.org/debian stable dovecot openldap2 postgresql openssl deb-src http://www.backports.org/debian stable dovecot (If you are using other backports you can merge dovecot etc.

(this mail is crossposted to 4 mailing lists, some of which being subscribers-only. Please consider this when answering if you need to) Let's see this as my first achievement of SambaXP (http://www.sambaxp.org). An "official" backport of cifs-utils (http://www.samba.org/linux-cifs/cifs-utils/) is now available for users of Debian lenny. This package can be found on backports.org,

I want to install debian-backports-keyring on puppet clients. However, I can''t install it because the client doesn''t already have the key: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- err: //Node[basenode]/tclbase/Package[debian-backports-keyring]/ensure: change from purged to present failed: Execution of ''/usr/bin/aptitude -y -o

Hi After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the /etc/apt/samba.lists file and previous updates have worked fine. Is

On 13 March 2023 15:19 Dr. Nicola Mingotti wrote: > Hi, > > Just an idea, > > i was moving samba in the last days, i put in my note that i did: > --- > $> sudo apt install -t bullseye-backports winbind > --- > > So maybe, if you installed the stable winbind and the backported samba there are issues. > > You might try to remove winbind and reinstall it from

Hi, Backports of the libguestfs, febootstrap, and hivex packages that have been shipped with Debian 7 (wheezy) for Debian 6 (squeeze) are now available via backports.debian.org. The versions are: libguestfs 1:1.18.1-1+deb7u2~bpo60+1 febootstrap 3.17-1~bpo60+1 hivex 1.3.6-2~bpo60+1 I have also removed the archive of older backports that was previously available at

I have several devices, mostly amd64 and armhf architectures, all of which updated samba to 4.17.6 without any problems. But one which is armel architecture failed to update; instead I get the following when I try to update: root at goflex:~# samba -V Version 4.17.5-Debian root at goflex:~# apt update Hit:1 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease Get:2 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian

Dear users of the Debian backports on CRAN, Because of an inconsistency of the README file with the actual situation on CRAN, which Ted Harding gratefully reported, I changed the archive on CRAN so the /etc/apt/sources.list entry has to be changed in case you would like to get updates of R backports to Debian stable in the future: Instead of deb

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:50:11 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > on the problematic DC "systemctl status" doesn't even show > "samba-ad-dc". > > Although: > > # systemctl status samba-ad-dc.service > ? samba-ad-dc.service - LSB: Samba daemons for the AD DC > Loaded: loaded

Hallo Everyone, since some days a new dovecot version is available in Debian "wheezy-backports": (1:2.2.9-1~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports As described in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib and http://www.dovecot.org/doc/NEWS-2.2 "xz"-compression is available since Dovecot version 2.2.9. Today I tried to convert my mailboxes with the new xz compression. Therfore I changed

Hi. I'm having a problem which I am not able to solve and yet it is easily reproducible. 1. Install Debian Stable AMD64 2. Add backports repository 3. aptitude -t lenny-backports install xen-linux-system-2.6.32-bpo5-xen-amd64 After rebooting You will get the usual error: elf_init: not an ELF binary *************************** Panic on CPU 0: Could not set up DOM0 guest OS

On 16 March 2023 20:22 Michael Tokarev wrote: > 14.03.2023 13:02, spindles seven via samba wrote: > This is one of many examples why I thought it is not a good idea to have the same > version of samba packages for bullseye on my repository as on testing/unstable. > But people insisted :) > > The thing is: both my bullseye 4.17 repository and debian unstable now has version >

Dear all, I have bad RAM on the machine that I am using to create the backports, so I need to replace it. It took me a while to figure it out... While I was able to create the backport after several iterations with spurious segfaults, I will not upload it as I am not sure if it could be corrupted in some way. I hope to be able to upload a clean backport of R 3.4.1 during the rest of the week

Hi! I just uploaded binaries of samba versions 4.19.7-1 and 4.20.1-5 for ubuntu and debian to the usual location, http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ . There are a few changes in there. First, I changed debian release suffix to be like: 4.20.1+dfsg-5~mjt-deb11 4.20.1+dfsg-5~mjt-ubt24 This should not change anything, just make it easier to track if neded, hopefully. And for 4.20

Hai, ? After some testing i can confirm there is a bug in the debian?backports samba. ( 4.1.11 the latest in backports ) ? The first server setups up ok without any problem. When you want to join the second server, it says its al succesfull but dont be fooled... its not! ? non of the needed dns entries are created.? ( samba-tool drs showrepl ) gives WERR_BADFILE No hostname, aka : ?no alias

18.03.2023 01:56, spindles seven wrote: > On 16 March 2023 20:22 Michael Tokarev wrote: .. >> Once you remove my 4.17 repo from your sources.list, apt wont be able to find the >> right version of samba for bullseye, even if "almost" the same version is available in >> bpo11. > > Thanks for this. However, I don't understand this last statement - once I

On 4/15/2016 2:30 PM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 15/04/16 18:54, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm unable to update my Samba from 4.1.17 to 4.4.2. I'm looking >> to build from tar instead. From what I gather the following should be >> the steps taken. >> >> ./configure --without-ad-dc -- sbindir= /usr/sbin >>