similar to: Random permission denied and path not found errors

On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:47:04 +0200 Tamas Papp via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 6/17/24 16:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > Are your incus containers privileged ? > > Yes. > > > I should also point out that, from the Samba point of view, 4.15.13 > > is EOL. > > > I can upgrade samba (ubuntu), but would only do if there is

I have upgraded one of the servers to 4.20 from MJT's repository, however it's not the main one and has way lower traffic load. I have also removed the entries that you suggested. Besides this changes I started wondering two other workarounds. 1. Is it possible to add and authenticate a local user when the samba server is an AD member? I would add a local user and render machines

I have zpool like that pool: tank state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz3-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ___c6t4d0 ONLINE

Hi, We have a samba 4.2.2 setup compiled from source, single DC, internal DNS. We've been using this samba setup in production since version 4.0.3. All clients are Windows 7-x64. Since we upgraded to samba 4.2.0 back in march 2015, we are not able to join client machines to the domain using our sysprep unattended image, but joining machines via the manual procedure using the Windows GUI

Hello, I try to connect with Active Directory Users and Computers from a W2k16 to a Samba 4.8.3 DC. I get the following error message: https://thomas.glanzmann.de/static/63a3e0ba-8a9d-11e8-891f-f3ff022aacb0/screenshot-x1-2018-07-18-17_12_49.png --------------------------- Active Directory Domain Services --------------------------- Naming information cannot be located because: The procedure

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 07:44:45PM +0300, Pavel Butsykin wrote: > This patch fixes the problem of the first boot after installation virtio block > drivers on Windows 10 / Server 2016. The problem is related to the change in > the behavior of Windows-Kernel-Pnp. To fix we need to add a field "Version" to > HKLM/SYSTEM/DriverDatabase/DriverPackages/drv_inf_label then

In a discussion a few weeks back, it was mentioned that the Best Practices Guide says something like "Don''t put more than ___ disks into a single vdev." At first, I challenged this idea, because I see no reason why a 21-disk raidz3 would be bad. It seems like a good thing. I was operating on assumption that resilver time was limited by sustainable throughput of disks, which

I currently am getting good speeds out of my existing system (8x 2TB in a RAIDZ2 exported over fibre channel) but there''s no such thing as too much speed, and these other two drive bays are just begging for drives in them.... If I go to 10x 2TB in a RAIDZ3, will the extra spindles increase speed, or will the extra parity writes reduce speed, or will the two factors offset and leave things

Hello, I installed updates today on my Ubuntu 20.04 and after that, Samba was disabled/masked/not installed at all. Even attempting to install samba again reports: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of

Had an idea, could someone please tell me why it''s wrong? (I feel like it has to be). A RaidZ-2 pool with one missing disk offers the same failure resilience as a healthy RaidZ1 pool (no data loss when one disk fails). I had initially wanted to do single parity raidz pool (5disk), but after a recent scare decided raidz2 was the way to go. With the help of a sparse file

On 6/17/24 22:46, Tamas Papp via samba wrote: > Is there anybody on the list, who is familiar with a similar use case: a > VFX workload backend or a storage server with a (relatively) lot of > files and parallel clients (read and write) and about 1-4 Gb/s traffic > load? Hello. I'm not even sure I know what you mean by "VFX workload" exactly. However the problem you

Hello, * Jon Gerdes <gerdesj at blueloop.net> [2018-07-17 02:45]: > Before you focus on Samba, it is generally good form to prove it or > get as close as you can. So: you can domain join OK but when using > sysprep (Microsoft provided utility), it fails. I don't think your > problem is with Samba but with sysprep. you're right. I tried a lot of things in the last 12

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:25:51 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > I try to connect with Active Directory Users and Computers from a > W2k16 to a Samba 4.8.3 DC. I get the following error message: > > https://thomas.glanzmann.de/static/63a3e0ba-8a9d-11e8-891f-f3ff022aacb0/screenshot-x1-2018-07-18-17_12_49.png > >

This is not the appropriate group/list for this message. Crossposting to zfs-discuss (where it perhaps primarily belongs) and to cifs-discuss, which also relates. > Hi, > > I have an I/O load issue and after days of searching > wanted to know if anyone has pointers on how to > approach this. > > My 1-year stable zfs system (raidz3 8 2TB drives, all > OK) just started to

On 6/17/24 20:18, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > There have been numerous fixes since 4.15.x , using the most recent > version of Samba possible is always a good idea. As usual, my concern with new releases that even though some fixes are included in general, with new features new bugs are added too. Of course, if nobody comes up with a specific idea or suggestion, I will give it a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 For anyone interested in testing some printing fixes: I've just uplaoded a moderate sized patch for Samba 3.0.7 that addresses the following bugs: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1519 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1679 Both fixes have been checked in for incusion in the next 3.0.8 preview release. The patch for 3.0.7

Hi All, I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn''t a RAID 10 setup better for data protection? So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn''t I: - mirror drive 1 and 5 - mirror drive 2 and 6 - mirror drive 3 and 7 - mirror drive 4 and 8 Then stripe 1,2,3,4 Then stripe 5,6,7,8 How does one do this with ZFS?

Looking for help regaining access to encrypted ZFS file systems that stopped accepting the encryption key. I have a file server with a setup as follows: Solaris 11 Express 1010.11/snv_151a 8 x 2-TB disks, each one divided into three equal size partitions, three raidz3 pools built from a "slice" across matching partitions: Disk 1 Disk 8 zpools +--+ +--+ |p1| .. |p1| <-

when you read. : http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg111972.html says: > >That output > ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure >is usually only seen when the internal DNS server is running. >It's a glitch, which can be ignored atm (all dyn. updates are done OK). > so if you dont want to see that error, switch to bind9_DLZ. Greetz, Louis

Hi there I have a Dialogic VFX/40 ESC plus installed on Redhat Linux 8.0 and looking for Channel drivers for this Card. where cann i found channel drivers for VFX/40 ESC ? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041223/d61b3065/attachment.htm