Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "vfs_snapper"
2024 Jun 19
1
vfs_snapper
Am 19.06.24 um 11:35 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba:
> Am 17.06.24 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>
>>> The user is member of "domain admins", isn't that enough?
>>
>> No, because they would be classed as 'others'.
>>
>>>
>>> Or does "SYNC_ACL" not yet work OK, because we miss the steps in
2024 Jun 17
1
vfs_snapper
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:40:42 +0200
"Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> I don't fully understand.
>
> man-page says
>
> "This directory must permit traversal for any users wishing to access
> snapshots via the Windows Explorer previous versions dialog. By
> default, traversal is forbidden for all non-root users.
2024 Jun 19
1
vfs_snapper
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:59:41 +0200
"Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Am 19.06.24 um 11:35 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba:
> > Am 17.06.24 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> >
> >>> The user is member of "domain admins", isn't that enough?
> >>
> >> No, because they would
2024 Jun 19
2
vfs_snapper
Am 17.06.24 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>> The user is member of "domain admins", isn't that enough?
>
> No, because they would be classed as 'others'.
>
>>
>> Or does "SYNC_ACL" not yet work OK, because we miss the steps in
>>
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs
>>
2024 Jun 19
1
vfs_snapper
Am 19.06.24 um 12:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>> ALLOW_GROUPS="domain\ admins"
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Where are you getting this from ?
:-)
> If I run this in a terminal:
>
> ALLOW_GROUPS="domain\ admins" ; echo "$ALLOW_GROUPS"
>
> I get this:
>
> domain\ admins
>
> Note that the
2024 Jun 19
1
vfs_snapper
Am 19.06.24 um 12:46 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba:
> Am 19.06.24 um 12:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>
>>> ALLOW_GROUPS="domain\ admins"
>> ??????????????? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> ??????????????? Where are you getting this from ?
>
> :-)
>
>> If I run this in a terminal:
>>
>> ALLOW_GROUPS="domain\ admins" ;
2024 Jun 21
1
vfs_snapper
Am 20.06.24 um 17:51 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba:
> So my alternative might be dropping snapper and do the btrfs-snapshots
> plus the rotation etc with self-written (=copied) scripts and timers.
>
> vfs_shadow_copy2 worked in my tests, I only switched to vfs_snapper
> because it looked promising to have all the rotation and cleanup of
> snapshots done by snapper
2024 Jun 20
1
vfs_snapper
Am 20.06.24 um 17:32 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba:
> Am 19.06.24 um 14:21 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba:
>
>> opened a ticket at https://github.com/openSUSE/snapper/issues/917 as well
>
> Did some debugging with their devs, now I found this samba-bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896
>
> comment 2 might point out the actual
2024 Jun 20
1
vfs_snapper
Am 19.06.24 um 14:21 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba:
> opened a ticket at https://github.com/openSUSE/snapper/issues/917 as well
Did some debugging with their devs, now I found this samba-bug:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14896
comment 2 might point out the actual issue with the code, I don't know
2003 Feb 16
2
AllowUsers Change
Markus, ignore the other stuff I sent.. I need to go back to bed and stop
trying to code.. <sigh>
For everone else.. Will this make everyone happy?
This does the follow.
it will always honor AllowUsers.
If there is no Allow/DenyGroups it stated they are not in allowUsers. IF
there are AllowDenyGroups it tries them. And then stated they are not in
either AllowUsers nor AllowGroups
2020 Nov 05
2
vfs_snapper is enabled but prerequisite dbus-1 package not found.
Hi,
I'm trying to configure samba 4.13.2 bot receive this messages
Checking for dbus : not found
vfs_snapper is enabled but prerequisite dbus-1 package not found. Use
--with-shared-modules=!vfs_snapper to disable vfs_snapper support.
(complete log in /srv/samba-4.13.2/bin/config.log)
What is wrong??
try this:
./configure --enable-fhs --prefix=/usr --sbindir=/usr/sbin
2020 Nov 06
1
vfs_snapper is enabled but prerequisite dbus-1 package not found.
Yes!
Thanks!!! that's how you say
El jue., 5 nov. 2020 a las 18:42, David Disseldorp (<ddiss at samba.org>)
escribi?:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:04:58 -0500, Leo C via samba wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to configure samba 4.13.2 bot receive this messages
> >
> > Checking for dbus : not found
> > vfs_snapper is
2002 Jul 04
4
Chroot patch (v3.4p1)
The following is a patch I've been working on to support a "ChrootUser"
option in the sshd_config file.
I was looking for a way to offer sftp access and at the same time restict
interactive shell access. This patch is a necessary first step (IMO).
It applies clean with 'patch -l'.
Also attached is a shell script that helps to build a chrooted home dir on
a RedHat 7.2
2012 Apr 10
3
Snapper packages for Ubuntu
Hi,
I''ve created snapper packages for Ubuntu, available on
https://launchpad.net/~snapper/+archive/stable. For those new to
snapper, it''s a tool for managing btrfs snapshots
(http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Snapper). It depends on libblocxx
available from https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-esser-n/+archive/blocxx ,
and currently uses git source up to commit 50dec40. I''ve done
2004 Jan 13
1
SMB Signature verification failed on incoming packet
My setup is Samba/smbclient version 3.0.1 on linux RedHat 9.
\\snapper\dfs is a dfs share on snapper, a Win2k3 Active Directory
server. My smb.conf contains:
[global]
realm = ciswinnet.cis.uab.edu
workgroup=CISWINNET
security = ADS
encrypt passwords = yes
password server = snapper.cis.uab.edu
client use spnego = yes
I am trying to run the following command:
smbclient \\\\snapper\\dfs
2014 Aug 05
1
was code added to detect or die on sighup recently?
I have a script that normally runs my snapshot that I haven't
used for the past several days because something seemed
to be going wrong and I wanted to run things manually.
But running the script twice today, I got:
> snaphome
Found 15 mounted dated, snaps or snap archives
?[snapper#2120]base_mp=/home
1 snap dated today.
(Use: '--force=force_create_snap' to force another snap.)
2002 Mar 28
1
[PATCH] Feature addition: user access control per auth method
I added a few features to openssh for my local use that I think would
be more broadly useful. I basically added access control lists to
control who would be allowed public key authentication. I added four
config file entries for the server:
PubkeyAllowUsers
PubkeyDenyUsers
PubkeyAllowGroups
PubkeyDenyGroups
These follow the same sematics as the already existing entries for
2001 Jun 18
2
Patch for changing expired passwords
The primary purpose of the attached patches is for portable OpenSSH to
support changing expired passwords as specified in shadow password files.
To support that, I did a couple enhancements to the base OpenBSD OpenSSH
code. They are:
1. Consolidated the handling of "forced_command" into a do_exec()
function in session.c. These were being handled inconsistently and
allocated
2017 Jun 26
2
test builds on private server updates (kernel)
Sorry Hughes,
got some questions.
I have the feeling that I do a lot wrong. Today I sent a mailing post
at fedora where it is also about btrfs under fedora.
In time when i write the mail i forward it my patch for fedora 25
pretransaction & snapper.yp, with the hope of feedback.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel at lists.fedoraproject
2004 Jan 14
1
signing failures during smbclient tar operation: SMB signature check failed
(Samba 3.0.1, RedHat 9, share is a w2k3, security = ADS)
Here is a snippet of debug level 3 output of an smbclient tar operation,
with error at the end. Command is:
# smbclient \\\\snapper\\dfs <password> -U Administrator -E -W CISWINNET
-D home -d3 -Tqca /tmp/test.tar
[2004/01/14 15:05:10, 3] lib/util.c:dos_clean_name(549)
dos_clean_name