similar to: [PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[PATCH 1/2] [v2] drm/nouveau: retain device pointer in nvkm_gsp_mem object"

2024 Jun 18
1
[PATCH 2/2] [v5] drm/nouveau: expose GSP-RM logging buffers via debugfs
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 21:54 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: Hi Timur, thanks for the follow-up on this patch series. On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 06:52:53PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: The LOGINIT, LOGINTR, LOGRM, and LOGPMU buffers are circular buffers that have printf-like logs from GSP-RM and PMU encoded in them. LOGINIT, LOGINTR, and LOGRM are allocated by Nouveau and their DMA addresses are
2024 Mar 03
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: keep DMA buffers required for suspend/resume
[adding a bunch of list and people as well as Timur Tabi, who authored the culprit] Sid Pranjale, thx for the report. FWIW, I'm just replying to add this to the regression tracking to ensure it does not fall through the cracks. Nevertheless let me mention two things while at it: On 29.02.24 18:58, Sid Pranjale wrote: > Nouveau deallocates a few buffers post GPU init which are required for
2024 Apr 26
3
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/firmware: Fix SG_DEBUG error with nvkm_firmware_ctor()
Currently, enabling SG_DEBUG in the kernel will cause nouveau to hit a BUG() on startup: kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:187! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 7 PID: 930 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3Lyude-Test+ #30 Hardware name: MSI MS-7A39/A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39), BIOS 1.I0 01/22/2019 RIP: 0010:sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 Code: 69 88 32 01 83 e1 03
2023 Dec 04
1
[PATCH] nouveau/gsp: add three notifier callbacks that we see in normal operation
These seem to get called, but it doesn't look like we have to care too much at this point. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c index
2023 Nov 07
3
[bug report] drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for booting GSP-RM
Hello Ben Skeggs, The patch 176fdcbddfd2: "drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for booting GSP-RM" from Sep 19, 2023 (linux-next), leads to the following Smatch static checker warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1016 r535_gsp_rpc_unloading_guest_driver() warn: 'rpc' isn't an ERR_PTR drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c 1010 static int
2024 Feb 20
2
[PATCH] [v4] nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support
Add the NVreg_RegistryDwords command line parameter, which allows specifying additional registry keys to be sent to GSP-RM. This allows additional configuration, debugging, and experimentation with GSP-RM, which uses these keys to alter its behavior. Note that these keys are passed as-is to GSP-RM, and Nouveau does not parse them. This is in contrast to the Nvidia driver, which may parse some
2023 Nov 07
2
[bug report] drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for booting GSP-RM
On 11/7/23 15:34, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Hello Ben Skeggs, > > The patch 176fdcbddfd2: "drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for > booting GSP-RM" from Sep 19, 2023 (linux-next), leads to the > following Smatch static checker warning: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1016 r535_gsp_rpc_unloading_guest_driver() > warn: 'rpc' isn't an
2023 Nov 16
3
[PATCH][next] nouveau/gsp: replace zero-length array with flex-array member and use __counted_by
Fake flexible arrays (zero-length and one-element arrays) are deprecated, and should be replaced by flexible-array members. So, replace zero-length array with a flexible-array member in `struct PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE`. Also annotate array `entries` with `__counted_by()` to prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the `__counted_by` attribute. Flexible array members annotated with
2010 Mar 14
2
Boot GSP node with KVM and VirtIO
I'm trying to boot a virtual GSP node with Linux KVM and VirtIO. While the install itself detects both the VirtIO harddisk (/dev/vdx) and VirtIO ethernet nic and completes successfully, I'm not able to boot the virtual machine from it. After POST I can only see the GSP boot message and the countdown timer, but when the timer reach 0 it stalls. When I reassign the _same_ disk as IDE or SCSI
2023 May 17
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/acr/ga102: set variable ga102_gsps storage-class-specifier to static
smatch reports drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c:49:1: warning: symbol 'ga102_gsps' was not declared. Should it be static? This variable is only used in its defining file, so it should be static Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git
2023 Nov 07
1
[bug report] drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for booting GSP-RM
On 11/7/23 20:00, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On 11/7/23 15:34, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> Hello Ben Skeggs, >> >> The patch 176fdcbddfd2: "drm/nouveau/gsp/r535: add support for >> booting GSP-RM" from Sep 19, 2023 (linux-next), leads to the >> following Smatch static checker warning: >> >> ????drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1016
2024 Mar 15
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/dp: Fix incorrect return code in r535_dp_aux_xfer()
I've recently been seeing some unexplained GSP errors on my RTX 6000 from failed aux transactions: [ 132.915867] nouveau 0000:1f:00.0: gsp: cli:0xc1d00002 obj:0x00730000 ctrl cmd:0x00731341 failed: 0x0000ffff While the cause of these is not yet clear, these messages made me notice that the aux transactions causing these transactions were succeeding - not failing. As it turns out, this
2013 Apr 22
2
subset dataframe
I can't understand what is happening. This is the code and results: > agoa <- read.table(file = "C:/Users/HTPC/Documents/_Documents/Research/WithDidia/AGOAUSImports.txt", header = T, sep = "\t", dec = ".", na.strings = "NA", stringsAsFactors = T)# > str(agoa); names(agoa) 'data.frame':109 obs. of  19 variables:  $ X    : Factor w/ 39
2013 Sep 04
2
Attribute Length Error when Trying plm Regression
Hello, I am trying to run a fixed effects panel regression on data containing 5 columns and 1,494 rows. I read the data in as follows: >drugsXX<-read.csv(file="C:\\Folder\\vX.X\\Drugs\\drugsXX_panel.csv", head=TRUE, sep=",") Verified it read in correctly and had a good data.frame: >dim(drugsXX) [1] 1494 5 >drugs XX produce expected data with correct column
2024 Mar 20
1
[PATCH] [v4] nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 13:57 +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > Thanks for sending a new version of the patch. > > Please make sure that for future patches you include a changelog, such that > it's easier for reviewers to keep track of what has changed. Will do. > > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/gsp.h | 6 + > >
2000 Jan 19
2
Samba and /etc/shadow.
Dear mailing-list! I have Samba 2.0.6 on a Redhat 6.1 linux box. How can I make samba use the /etc/shadow file for authenticating users? Reading the archives I assumed there should be a compile-time option I should set, but I found no such option. Regards -- Shahin Merat, Dept. of gastroenterology, Shariati Hospital, N Kargar st., Tehran, Iran merat@ams.ac.ir / merats@sums.ac.ir
1999 Dec 16
3
Samab and init.d
Is it better to start Samba using in initd, or to use the script, much like the one provided by SuSE. ?? so far I have used the script, but I don't like the fact of having to start samba manually. I would much prefer to see it run as a service. just to confirm all it really involves is starting smbd and nmbd Rowan [TSS] Gerber Scientific Products http://www.gspinc.com
2024 Jan 08
1
[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 5/5] nouveau: fix disp disabling with GSP
From: Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> [ Upstream commit 7854ea0e408d7f2e8faaada1773f3ddf9cb538f5 ] This func ptr here is normally static allocation, but gsp r535 uses a dynamic pointer, so we need to handle that better. This fixes a crash with GSP when you use config=disp=0 to avoid disp problems. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> Link:
2009 Aug 03
1
plm summary error
Dear "plm"-Package insiders, [I posted the following observation is April already but unfortunately I am not aware of any answers. With the hope that someone found an answer in the mean time, I ask again:] I realized the following difficulty with the summary.plm function (demonstrated with the example from the ?plm documentation). library(plm) data("Produc",
2023 Apr 07
1
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/nvkm/outp: Use WARN_ON() in conditionals in nvkm_outp_init_route()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/outp.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/outp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/outp.c index 6094805fbd63..06b19883a06b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/outp.c +++