similar to: Samba 4.15.13 GPO and Windows 10/11

I've been using Samba 4.x as a domain controller with windows 10 and 11 for many years. It should work fine. On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 3:54?PM Gilberto Ferreira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi there. > > Simple question: Samba 4.15.13 GPO and Windows 10/11: does it's works or > not? > --- > > > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > -- > To

Oh! It's works. Thanks a lot. God bless you all. --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em qui., 30 de mai. de 2024 ?s 10:40, miguel medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> escreveu: > For a GPO to work, both "Authenticated Users" and "Domain Computers" must > have "Read" rights. > > On a Policy Object, go to

Try this. http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:main-menu Some examples there.??Also reference to sysvol syncing etc. LP On 30 May 2024 at 13:36 +0100, Gilberto Ferreira <gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com>, wrote: > > I will appreciate any tips or docs. Thanks a lot.

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 4:00?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again > I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd > > apt list --upgradable > Listing... Done > glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2

Hi again I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd apt list --upgradable Listing... Done glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfapi0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfchangelog0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64

Ok. No problem. I can test it in a virtual environment. Send me the path. Oh but the way, I don't compile gluster from scratch. I was used the deb file from https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/Debian/ --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 09:21, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: >

Hi Gilberto, On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:56?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Xavi > That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? > It should be safe, but I wouldn't test it on production. Can't you try it in any test environment before ? Xavi > > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 -

After force the add-brick gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 force volume add-brick: success pve01:~# gluster volume info Volume Name: VMS Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: e1a4f787-3f62-441e-a7ce-c0ae6b111ebf Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 3 x (2 + 1) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:

Hi Xavi That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 07:45, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: > The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the > problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the

What's the volume structure right now? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 18:24, Gilberto Ferreira<gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: So I went ahead and do the force (is with you!) gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present

So I went ahead and do the force (is with you!) gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant co nfiguration. Use 'force' at the end of the command

The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the patch and check if the problem persists ? On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:10?AM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. > > Any fix about this issue? > > May 14 07:05:39

I found this https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Server_2012_/_2012_R2_DC_to_a_Samba_AD 2016-09-13 15:23 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com>: > More info: > > I did a fully windows update, but still get the error. > The time on server and on client are the same! > The Samba Server, which is the DNS Server as well, is set as primary DNS

Yes but I want to add. Is it the same logic? --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira +55 (47) 99676-7530 Proxmox VE VinChin Backup & Restore Em ter., 5 de nov. de 2024, 14:09, Aravinda <aravinda at kadalu.tech> escreveu: > Hello Gilberto, > > You can create a Arbiter volume using three bricks. Two of them will be > data bricks and one will be Arbiter brick. > > gluster volume

Hi there. Thank you for your reply. Are using RSAT to set the gpo and stuff? In what Windows? 7? 10? 11? I will appreciate any tips or docs. Thanks a lot. --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em qui., 30 de mai. de 2024 ?s 01:12, Michael Jones via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > I've been using Samba 4.x as a domain controller with

But if I change replica 2 arbiter 1 to replica 3 arbiter 1 gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 I got thir error: volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant configuration. Use

Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. Any fix about this issue? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5)

At the moment, my difficulty is about enforcing some GPO rules to a user, which simply does not allow them to use the control panel. I have had to create the GPO and create the rule. Also include the user to these rules, but nevertheless when a user logged in he can use the control panel. I had tried to use regedit as well but it had no effect. Initially I thought that could be related to the fact

qemu-img info 100/vm-100-disk-0.qcow2 image: 100/vm-100-disk-0.qcow2 file format: qcow2 virtual size: 120 GiB (128849018880 bytes) disk size: 916 GiB cluster_size: 65536 Format specific information: compat: 1.1 compression type: zlib lazy refcounts: false refcount bits: 16 corrupt: false extended l2: false Child node '/file': filename: 100/vm-100-disk-0.qcow2

I would like to help with this VFS, but my skill as programmer is near 0!... but I am openning to test if some one write it... But I get the idea! It's seems very simple, for those has the right skill to do that 2016-09-29 14:34 GMT-03:00 Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:25:18PM -0300, Gilberto Nunes via samba wrote: > > WOW! That's could be