Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Usrname map and Windows ACLs question"
2024 May 28
1
Usrname map and Windows ACLs question
Hola Iv?n,
Good that you use MJT repo, but you probably don?t need it, bookworm back ports provides the same version these days.
http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:installing-from-backports
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=samba&suite=bookworm-backports
Regarding your member server, may I suggest you check out my notes, based on official samba wiki:
2024 May 29
1
Usrname map and Windows ACLs question
Hi!. I've already read that really useful notebook. Thanks for it.
Sadly, I couldn't find any differences.
All seems work OK without "username map" but as soon as I map
OURDOM\Administrator to root v?a "username map",? I lost "Sessions" and
"Open files" in RSAT, so I would like to know if I miss something
without that mapping.
Does RSAT
2024 May 29
2
Usrname map and Windows ACLs question
On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:40:42 -0300
Ivan Lopez via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi!. I've already read that really useful notebook. Thanks for it.
> Sadly, I couldn't find any differences.
>
> All seems work OK without "username map" but as soon as I map
> OURDOM\Administrator to root v?a "username map",? I lost "Sessions"
2006 Jun 23
1
Samba 3.0.22: share be r/w for LDAP-authenticated users, r/o for anonymous
Hi there,
we need to implement the following scenario:
- Samba server 3.0.22 (NOT acting as a domain controller; we don't use
Windows networking domains)
- users use Linux and Windoze
- anonymous users accessing a certain share should be granted read-only
access
- successfully authenticated users should be given read-write access
- authentication should be performed against an LDAP that
2023 Jul 14
4
updated samba 4.18 & 4.17 packages for debian & ubuntu to address trust issue with windows 10/11 update 07/2023
Hi!
I've uploaded samba packages for debian & ubuntu in my repository, to
include the fix for recent login/trust issue with 07/2023 windows
updates. 4.16 packages will also be available later today (build is
in progress now).
http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/
JFYI.
Thanks,
/mjt
2024 Mar 11
3
Updating to Samba Version 4.19.5 via Debian Bookworm Backports
11.03.2024 17:40, spindles seven via samba:
> Hi
>
> After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the
2023 Jul 14
1
updated samba 4.18 & 4.17 packages for debian & ubuntu to address trust issue with windows 10/11 update 07/2023
Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question.
I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives
in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source
packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should
already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it
will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks.
Updated bookworm
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
30.04.2023 11:20, Rowland Penny via samba ?????:
..
> There is a big problem with this, bookworm hasn't been released yet and as far as I can see, there isn't a bookworm-backports yet.
> The only mention of Samba 4.18 that I can see in Debian is in experimental, a long way from any backports.
No, there's no long way to bookworm-backports.
I use experimental just because debian
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will
>>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,
2023 Oct 18
2
@Michael Tokarev: Samba 4.17.12
Hi Michael,
thanks for the info - and your work...
As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that.
This is "just" my playground...
Regards
Ingo
https://github.com/WAdama
Michael Tokarev via samba schrieb am 18.10.2023 um 09:17:
> 16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> short question: will the
2023 Apr 30
2
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
> Hi Yvan,
>
> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I need
> to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then getting
> the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just a little
> over a month away, so there is ample time for planning upgrades.
>
> Best
2023 Oct 18
1
@Michael Tokarev: Samba 4.17.12
Op 18-10-2023 om 11:32 schreef Ingo Asche via samba:
> Hi Michael,
>
> thanks for the info - and your work...
>
> As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that.
> This is "just" my playground...
I have recently migrated my Raspberry Pi machines from Raspbian to
Debian bookworm.
It has several advantages:
- All Debian packages are
2003 May 29
1
Accessing printer from outside the domain
We need to give a user in another domain access to our printer:
our domain: OURDOM (samba)
other domain: OTHERDOM (AD?)
user's workstation: \\OTHERDOM\WKSTN, in other domain
printer: in our domain
user: JOEBLOW - an account in each domain with the same login/password
We're getting this error in wkstn.log:
[2003/05/28 20:44:20, 1] smbd/password.c:server_validate(1101)
password
2023 Apr 30
2
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be
>> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck.
>> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba
2023 Aug 18
1
Updating samba with bookworm-backports
18.08.2023 10:47, spindles seven via samba ?????:
> On August 16, 2023 spindles seven wrote:
>> roy at franks:~$ sudo apt -t bookworm-backports install samba winbind
>> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information...
>> Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
>> requested an impossible situation
2023 Aug 18
1
Updating samba with bookworm-backports
On August 16, 2023 spindles seven wrote:
> roy at franks:~$ sudo apt -t bookworm-backports install samba winbind
> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information...
> Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that
> some required
2024 Mar 11
2
Updating to Samba Version 4.19.5 via Debian Bookworm Backports
Hi
After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the /etc/apt/samba.lists file and previous updates have worked fine. Is
2023 Apr 30
3
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>
>> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
2023 Oct 18
2
@Michael Tokarev: Samba 4.17.12
16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too?
>
> I saw, Bookworm is already updated...
Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual
backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually),
I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often. On the other hand, this
2013 Jan 24
2
rsync parameters errors
In my new bash script, I'm doing what I think is a very simple rsync
command the way I'm used to doing it. I just do a lot of setup and
checking before I get to it.
When I run it, it gets very unhappy with me. It's probably something
very simple.
I need to build the rsync command in a string so that some things can go
away - like if my variables DRY_RUN and DELETE are undefined,