similar to: Usrname map and Windows ACLs question

Hola Iv?n, Good that you use MJT repo, but you probably don?t need it, bookworm back ports provides the same version these days. http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:installing-from-backports https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=samba&suite=bookworm-backports Regarding your member server, may I suggest you check out my notes, based on official samba wiki:

Hi!. I've already read that really useful notebook. Thanks for it. Sadly, I couldn't find any differences. All seems work OK without "username map" but as soon as I map OURDOM\Administrator to root v?a "username map",? I lost "Sessions" and "Open files" in RSAT, so I would like to know if I miss something without that mapping. Does RSAT

On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:40:42 -0300 Ivan Lopez via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi!. I've already read that really useful notebook. Thanks for it. > Sadly, I couldn't find any differences. > > All seems work OK without "username map" but as soon as I map > OURDOM\Administrator to root v?a "username map",? I lost "Sessions"

Hi there, we need to implement the following scenario: - Samba server 3.0.22 (NOT acting as a domain controller; we don't use Windows networking domains) - users use Linux and Windoze - anonymous users accessing a certain share should be granted read-only access - successfully authenticated users should be given read-write access - authentication should be performed against an LDAP that

Hi! I've uploaded samba packages for debian & ubuntu in my repository, to include the fix for recent login/trust issue with 07/2023 windows updates. 4.16 packages will also be available later today (build is in progress now). http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ JFYI. Thanks, /mjt

11.03.2024 17:40, spindles seven via samba: > Hi > > After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the

Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question. I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks. Updated bookworm

30.04.2023 11:20, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: .. > There is a big problem with this, bookworm hasn't been released yet and as far as I can see, there isn't a bookworm-backports yet. > The only mention of Samba 4.18 that I can see in Debian is in experimental, a long way from any backports. No, there's no long way to bookworm-backports. I use experimental just because debian

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

Hi Michael, thanks for the info - and your work... As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. This is "just" my playground... Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Michael Tokarev via samba schrieb am 18.10.2023 um 09:17: > 16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> short question: will the

On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi Yvan, > > Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I need > to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then getting > the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just a little > over a month away, so there is ample time for planning upgrades. > > Best

Op 18-10-2023 om 11:32 schreef Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for the info - and your work... > > As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. > This is "just" my playground... I have recently migrated my Raspberry Pi machines from Raspbian to Debian bookworm. It has several advantages: - All Debian packages are

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

18.08.2023 10:47, spindles seven via samba ?????: > On August 16, 2023 spindles seven wrote: >> roy at franks:~$ sudo apt -t bookworm-backports install samba winbind >> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... >> Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have >> requested an impossible situation

On August 16, 2023 spindles seven wrote: > roy at franks:~$ sudo apt -t bookworm-backports install samba winbind > Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... > Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that > some required

Hi After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the /etc/apt/samba.lists file and previous updates have worked fine. Is

We need to give a user in another domain access to our printer: our domain: OURDOM (samba) other domain: OTHERDOM (AD?) user's workstation: \\OTHERDOM\WKSTN, in other domain printer: in our domain user: JOEBLOW - an account in each domain with the same login/password We're getting this error in wkstn.log: [2003/05/28 20:44:20, 1] smbd/password.c:server_validate(1101) password

On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >> >> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:

16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? > > I saw, Bookworm is already updated... Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often. On the other hand, this

In my new bash script, I'm doing what I think is a very simple rsync command the way I'm used to doing it. I just do a lot of setup and checking before I get to it. When I run it, it gets very unhappy with me. It's probably something very simple. I need to build the rsync command in a string so that some things can go away - like if my variables DRY_RUN and DELETE are undefined,