similar to: [ldoms-discuss] Solaris 10 patch 137137-09 broke LDOM

Hi, in preparation to try zfs boot on sparc I installed all recent patches incl. feature patches comming from s10s_u3wos_10 and after reboot finally 137137-09 (still having everything on UFS). Now it doesn''t boot at anymore: ############################### Sun Fire V240, No Keyboard Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. OpenBoot 4.22.23, 2048 MB memory installed,

Hello, I''m a grad student working at University of Michigan in computer architecture. I''m writing to open up the idea that instrumentation of the xvm would be extremely useful tool for the research community. Those of us interested in virtualization are very interested in monitoring the behavior of these systems and with low engineering effort! I was hoping to get feedback on

[Cross-posting to ldoms-discuss] We are occasionally seeing massive time-to-completions for I/O requests on ZFS file systems on a Sun T5220 attached to a Sun StorageTek 2540 and a Sun J4200, and using a SSD drive as a ZIL device. Primary access to this system is via NFS, and with NFS COMMITs blocking until the request has been sent to disk, performance has been deplorable. The NFS server is a

We have a virtualized environment of T-Series where each host has either zones or LDoms. All of the virtual systems will have their own dedicated storage on ZFS (and some may also get raw LUNs). All the SAN storage is delivered in fixed sized 33GB LUNs. The question I have to the community is whether it would be better to have a pool per virtual system, or create a large pool and carve out ZFS

That is...is there a mechanism provided to do this? As an afterthought, this also applies to non-global zones, although one can stick something in the oem-banner eeprom variable that is identically visible on all the zones, which is not the case on LDOMs. However, that''s not a supported mechanism. Having something that was would be better. Ideal if the same mechanism (on what might or

Hi, since hostid is stored in the label, "zpool import" failed if the hostid dind''t match. Under certain circonstances (ldom failover) it means you have to manually force the zpool import while booting. With more than 80 LDOMs on a single host it will be great if we could configure the machine back to the old behavior where it didn''t failed, maybe with a /etc/sytem

I have zfs on my base T5210 box installed with LDOMS (v.1.0.3). Every time I try to jumpstart my Guest machine, I get the following error. ERROR: One or more disks are found, but one of the following problems exists: - Hardware failure - The disk(s) available on this system cannot be used to install Solaris Software. They do not have a valid label. If you want to use the

Suppose I have a storage server that runs ZFS, presumably providing file (NFS) and/or block (iSCSI, FC) services to other machines that are running Solaris. Some of the use will be for LDoms and zones[1], which would create zpools on top of zfs (fs or zvol). I have concerns about variable block sizes and the implications for performance. 1.

Hi, i''m having problems attaching disks from a fc-san to a solaris 10 guest. xen host ist a opensolaris box "SunOS node1 5.11 snv_127 i86pc i386 i86xpv". my xen guest is named pg4. this command works fine. virsh attach-disk pg4 /dev/dsk/c8t600A0B800029D69A000013CA4B00E1ABd0 hdb and before i was able to import this volume as a zpool on the xen host - so connection to this

Hello, I am trying to update files on LDOM boot disk from Control Domain, but I can''t get it working fully. I have a setup that allows to quickly deploy LDOM guest domains. The Golden OS Image of guest domain boot disk is on a ZFS Volume. This ZFS Volume has been Snapshot and Cloned for the quick deployment of guest domains. Filesystem in both the control domain and guest domain is

[ Redirecting to xen-discuss@opensolaris.org ] xiao liu wrote: > I installed Nevada b84 on my laptop then built latest onnv-gate > on it. > > After I installed it using Install and try to boot, > it panic for don''t know "/xpvd" (hvmboot_rootconf failed) > > Seems b84 don''t support xpvd/xpv, What should I do now, > should I use BFU instead?

Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:09:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote: > > Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >> On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: > >>> Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif > >>> > >>> (I

Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: > > > > Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif > > > > (I used ldbadd instead of ldbmodify, is that a problem?) > > No, that isn't the problem, the problem is that I forgot to remove a > comment :-( > >

I am running OpenSolaris build 134 on a T1000 (Sparc). It has been an uphill battle getting this far. Many of the commands I find in the various documentation won''t work for me. ------------------------------------------------------------ steve@t1000:~# pfexec pkg install xvm-gui Creating Plan pkg: ''xvm-gui'' matches multiple packages

Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:06:03 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 26/07/2020 10:58, RhineDevil wrote: > > You said you didn't want to help me about this but if you'd do at least I'd learn something useful for custom schemas, since this type of error isn't referenced anywhere > > No, I said I wouldn't help you shoot yourself in the

i want to ask 2 questions. 1) can R do Random-effects GLS regression which i can get from Stata? the following result is frome Stata.can I get the alike result from R? xtreg lwage educ black hisp exper expersq married union, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 4360 Group variable (i) : nr Number of groups = 545 R-sq:

Gurus; I''ve been running Solaris 10 on a HVM domain on my machine (running SXCE snv_93 x86) for some time now. Now that Solaris 10 Update 6 (10/08) has been released, I tried creating a Paravirtualized Guest domain but got the same error message I got previously... # virt-install -n sol10 -p -r 1560 --nographics -f /dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/sol10 -l /stage/sol-10-u6-> Starting

Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:57:05 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 26/07/2020 09:43, RhineDevil via samba wrote: > > 64 Naming violation: objectClass: myObjectClass not a valid child class for <OU=myOrganizationUnit,DC=domain,DC=local> > > Could someone give me an hint on why such an error could occur? > > Please post the ldif you are trying

Gents, We want to understand the mechanism of zfs a bit better. Q: what is the design/algorithm of zfs in terms of reclaiming unused blocks? Q: what criteria is there for zfs to start reclaiming blocks Issue at hand is an LDOM or zone running in a virtual (thin-provisioned) disk on a NFS server and a zpool inside that vdisk. This vdisk tends to grow in size even if the user writes and deletes

I wanted to send out status on the effort to make a version of Solaris install available that supports zfs as a root file system. I''ve got a version of it ready for distribution, but I''d like to test it on the Build 62 community release before I make it available. Without the build 62 community release, I have to test it on a build 61 image, updated with some build 62 packages.