Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "idmap choice for print server"
2024 May 16
1
idmap choice for print server
On Thu, 16 May 2024 15:44:43 +0200
Khalid via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to set up a SAMBA print server as an AD domain member.
> In the SAMBA Wiki there's a section about idmap and I have to admit I
> don't understand what the correct choice for my case would be. I have
> a domain controller where all users of the AD
2019 Nov 04
2
suddenly change: idmap uid + gid
On Sunday, 3 November 2019 01:41:18 PST Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> As I said, you cannot use 'winbind use default domain = yes' with
> 'autorid', it makes all users and groups members of the same domain,
> this is probably what has happened here.
>
> Remove the line, this should stop it happening again
>
> If you have only one domain, then you
2019 Nov 05
2
suddenly change: idmap uid + gid
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 01:37:15 PST Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 04/11/2019 18:52, Alexey A Nikitin wrote:
> > On Sunday, 3 November 2019 01:41:18 PST Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> >> As I said, you cannot use 'winbind use default domain = yes' with
> >> 'autorid', it makes all users and groups members of the same domain,
> >> this
2019 Nov 03
2
suddenly change: idmap uid + gid
Am 03.11.2019 um 09:42 schrieb Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
>
> ?On 02/11/2019 23:18, Hilberg via samba wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The server suddenly changed the uid + gid. this happened to times, yesterday and the week after. The default group at example
>> The samba is a AD member where we have many users (>20 000) and we use autorid in
2019 Nov 03
2
suddenly change: idmap uid + gid
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 08:39 +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 02/11/2019 23:18, Hilberg via samba wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The server suddenly changed the uid + gid. this happened to times,
> > yesterday and the week after. The default group at example
> > The samba is a AD member where we have many users (>20 000) and we
> > use
> > autorid
2019 Nov 02
7
suddenly change: idmap uid + gid
Hi
The server suddenly changed the uid + gid. this happened to times,
yesterday and the week after. The default group at example
The samba is a AD member where we have many users (>20 000) and we use
autorid in that way
[global]
security = ads
workgroup = CUSTOMER
realm = CUSTOMER.COM
winbind use default domain = yes
winbind enum users = yes
winbind enum group = yes
2016 Jan 11
2
Security permissions issues after changing idmap backend from RID to AUTORID
On 2016-01-10 at 17:58 +0000, Rowland penny wrote:
> On 10/01/16 17:05, Partha Sarathi wrote:
> >
> > > This could have a lot to do with the fact that idmap_rid &
> > > idmap_autorid calculate the uids differently i.e if you have RID
> > > '2025000', autorid would calculate this as '1102500000' , rid
> > > would calculate this as
2016 Jan 10
2
Security permissions issues after changing idmap backend from RID to AUTORID
Thanks for the reply. Now we end-up with mix uid/gid from both ranges in
cache TDBs. Few user logins are denied with below error in smbd.log,
*[2016/01/07 11:39:44.475960, 1, pid=5202]
../source3/auth/token_util.c:430(add_local_groups*
** SID S-1-5-21-3082371790-1274690562-2878062458-5771 -> getpwuid(10005771)
failed**
wbinfo --user-info=mariond
mariond:*:10015138:110000513:Marion,
2016 Jan 08
2
Security permissions issues after changing idmap backend from RID to AUTORID
adding samba list
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Partha Sarathi <parthasarathi.bl at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> We have a customer who facing security issues after changing RID idmap
> backend to AUTORID.
>
>
> The History of the issue looks as below,
>
> 1) When samba configured with RID idmap backend customer requested to
> change few permissions,
2024 Jun 12
2
use of ‘idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes’ in DCs
Am 11.06.24 um 19:37 schrieb Luis Peromarta via samba:
> Correct, and I have done so and explained extensively at the beginning to this thread.
>
> Question is:
>
> Should we stop telling people to provision with idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes ?
As one who uses that option I would say no. However, I see that it is
very confusing for someone new to Samba.
It is the same for the ID
2010 Mar 04
1
InterPBX communication using SIP
Hi Guys,
i am using the following config in pbx1:
register => pbx1:endopass at 172.16.200.175 <pbx1%3Aendopass at 172.16.200.175>
[pbx2]
type=friend
host=dynamic
trunk=yes
sercret=password
context=[default]
deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
permit=172.16.200.175/255.255.255.128
in pbx2:
register => pbx2:endopass at 172.16.200.176 <pbx2%3Aendopass at 172.16.200.176>
[pbx1]
type=friend
2019 Oct 18
6
Winbind and caching - idmap, DC
On Friday, 18 October 2019 10:52:40 PDT Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 18/10/2019 18:26, Alexey A Nikitin via samba wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have few questions about Winbind on AD DS domain member I'm having difficulty finding answers to in the docs on my own:
> > * does Winbind remember the last DC it was connected to on shutdown, will it attempt to
2017 Aug 07
6
member server idmap config (auto)rid
I've joined a samba 4.48 (debian stretch) to a Windows 2008R2 AD domain
according to
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member
It joins OK but I cannot get idmap rid (or autorid) to work
idmap config * : backend = autorid
idmap config * : range = 1000000-1199999
Nothing is returned for getent "SAMDOM\user"
log.winbindd shows:
[2017/08/07
2011 Oct 04
2
[LLVMdev] setjmp - longjmp
On Oct 4, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Khaled ElWazeer
> <khalid.alwazeer at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have some code which has sigsetjmp / longjmp. After a longjmp, unreachable
>> is inserted, which is fine. The problem is that in the backend before
>> calling longjmp, some register was spilled to a
2024 Sep 06
9
[Bug 3729] New: the new sshd does not work under the supervision of inetd
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3729
Bug ID: 3729
Summary: the new sshd does not work under the supervision of
inetd
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 9.8p1
Hardware: ARM
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
2024 Jun 05
1
SePrintOperatorPrivilege NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
Hi everyone,
I seem to have come to a dead end, so here I am, turning to you, asking for your expertise. :)
Whenever I try
net rpc rights grant 'MYDOMAIN\grp_it_members' SePrintOperatorPrivilege -U'MYDOMAIN\admin'
I get this error:
Password for [MYDOMAIN\admin]:
Could not connect to server 127.0.0.1
The username or password was not correct.
Connection failed:
2011 Jan 18
3
Ruby on Rails on Kylin 2.1 (麒麟操作系统2.1)
Anyone have experience with Ruby on Rails and Kylin 2.1.
I''m in process of setting up RVM and Rails 3.0.3 along with MongoDB on
Kylin 2.1 for the ultimate in a scalable high performance Ruby on
Rails environment to build a world class multi-server web application.
Best,
Khalid
http://bit.ly/fvfGU4
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
2011 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] setjmp - longjmp
That code should do it, but I realized you only detect setjmp functions by
name. My code is calling "__sigsetjmp" not "segsetjmp". You only support
these functions:
static const char *ReturnsTwiceFns[] = {
"_setjmp",
"setjmp",
"sigsetjmp",
"setjmp_syscall",
"savectx",
"qsetjmp",
2015 Mar 03
1
idmap backends, clean slates and the AD DC
Am 22.02.2015 um 02:18 schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
> On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 20:05 +0000, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>> I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much
>> underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be
>> made?
>>
>> After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a
>> Samba Active Directory
2017 Aug 08
2
member server idmap config (auto)rid
(forwarding as I forgot to reply-all)
-----Original Message-----
From: Lange Norbert
Sent: Dienstag, 08. August 2017 12:26
To: 'mathias dufresne'
Subject: RE: [Samba] member server idmap config (auto)rid
>Did you install libpam-winbind? libpam-krb5?
Nope, I did try installing them now, made no difference.
I have backup-scripts running on the server for months, and it worked before.