similar to: query: bad tsig signature for key

hi, At least with a recent version if it is a time sync issue nsd will do a specific log msg that. Laura, can you send over the actual configuration? (maybe replacing the key with a placeholder or rotating the keys afterwards) It sounds strange if nsd checks tsig on the notify, but allow xfr without it. Regards, Tam?s May 16, 2024 16:14:59 Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users <nsd-users at

While SVCB/HTTPS provides a better solution for the browsing use case, I see other use cases where ALIAS/ANAME would be ideal, notably in apex RRs. So while fostering SVCB/HTTPS deployment is a good thing, I wouldn?t mind name server software implementing ALIAS. Including NSD, but I reckon it?s much more challenging to do due to NSD architecture than it was to implement it in PowerDNS. But if

Hi Christof! AFAIK, PowerDNS is the only open source name server that supports ALIAS. There was an idea to standardize ALIAS as "ANAME" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-aname/), but the idea was dropped in favor of SVCB/HTTPS record https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9460/. So now we have to wait until all Browser vendors implement SVCB/HTTPS. Regards Klaus PS: If

Hello World, I am trying to build NSD4 on Debian Squeeze and I get the following errors when running `make`. ``` $ pwd /home/wiz/src/nsd/tags/NSD_4_0_0_imp_5 $ make [... output omitted ...] gcc -g -O2 -o nsd-checkconf answer.o axfr.o buffer.o configlexer.o configparse acket.o query.o rbtree.o radtree.o rdata.o region-allocator.o tsig.o tsig-opens 4_pton.o b64_ntop.o -lcrypto configparser.o: In

Hello! Does nsd support ALIAS records or is there a plan to support it somewhen in the future? I didn't find anything about this topic in conjunction with nsd. Afaik there is no RFC for it and I guess therefore nsd does not support it. PowerDNS does for example: https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/guides/alias.html Br, Christof -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Dear NSD users, Here is the release candidate for NSD 3.2.15. This comes with ILNP support, NSD-RRL and different TSIG initialization (it fails if it can't find no suitable algorithms, instead of can't find 'one of the'). Plus some bugfixes. The NSD-RRL implementation is based on the work by Vixie and Schryver. However, because of the code-diversity argument that is at the basis

Dear All, Please help me understand why timestamps in logs are different from those in nsd-control zonestatus output: served-serial: "2024022603 since 2024-02-27T08:07:51" commit-serial: "2024022603 since 2024-02-27T08:07:51" Feb 26 18:47:34 slave-server nsd[780]: zone testzone.test. received update to serial 2024022603 at 2024-02-26T18:47:33 from

Hi Jeroen, I just realised that the version I use is very old -- 4.1. So first what I should do -- updating it and only then come here , asking for clarification. ??, 27 ????. 2024??. ? 14:19, Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl>: > Hi Peter, > > NSD processes updates in batches. xfrd receives the [AI]XFR and > schedules a reload for the main process, which in turn forks

Hi Peter, NSD processes updates in batches. xfrd receives the [AI]XFR and schedules a reload for the main process, which in turn forks new serve children. The served-serial is updated after main reports success, the commit-serial (update written to disk) is updated before the reload (to explain the serials). The difference in timestamp can be explained by the fact that NSD looks up if the serial

Hello, while investigating a report from Jan-Piet Mens (resulting in http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/3109), we discovered that NSD (both 3.2.15 and 4.0.0b4) compresses labels in RP content. As far as I can see, this is not allowed by RFC3597 section 4 paragraph 1/2. PowerDNS Recursor, like Unbound and BIND, now deals with this as 3597 section 4 paragraph 4 says we SHOULD. Nevertheless,

I just noticed this with NSD 4.10.0 (and earlier versions - it's not a new regression)) I have nsd set to log refused requests to syslog. After adding a DNAME type into my dns for one sub-zone that is being moved, I noticed that legitimate requests for hosts under that subdomain are working as expected, howerver they are being logged as refused. As a quick replicable test, I just did this

Hello, My question is not related to NSD in particular, but I have seen here on the list a lot of people that work for TLDs and other Registrars and Registry operators I thought it would be a good place to ask this question. It is about DNS though, not completely off topic :). I have encountered in my DNS studies a few name servers that let you transfer zones they are authoritative for. The

Dear all, NSD 4.12.0rc1 pre-release is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.12.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 b9085a3fd08b8318ac30715faf1c7698099781eb3520253774a46f74386342e9 pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.12.0rc1.tar.gz.asc This release introduces Prometheus metrics that can be compiled with `--enable-prometheus-metrics` and configured with `enable-metrics` (see

On 3/20/23 13:41, Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users wrote: > Hi Robert, > > NSD doesn't understand the GENERATE directive. You'll have to create > your zone files using a script or template engine. Understood but certainly not helpful with large dynamic IPv6 PTR's... Not that dynamic hosts NEED PTR's, but would still be nice to have. -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP:

B.t.w. I've created a PR for it that resolves it (see https://github.com/NLnetLabs/nsd/pull/346 ), but we may need to discuss if and how to resolve it first. First I'd like to know if your configuration is similar in that the CNAME or DNAME target does contain an allow-query list. Op 03-07-2024 om 10:52 schreef Willem Toorop via nsd-users: > Hi Jamie, > > I can reproduce,

Hi, I'm new to NSD and would really appreciate if someone can point me to the right direction. I have like 8 NSD servers (secondary) serving around 30,000 zones. Zone updates are transferred from the primary DNS servers by AXFR/IXFR. The 8 NSD servers do not save the zones file on disk but are only held in memory. Therefore after NSD service is restarted zone transfer requests are being

Hello! I use NSD 4.7.0 self compiled: Configure line: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man --infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --disable-option-checking --disable-silent-rules --libdir=${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu --runstatedir=/run --disable-maintainer-mode --disable-dependency-tracking

hi, On 2024-12-27 22:32, Fredrik Pettai via nsd-users wrote: > Hello, > > It seems our NSD secondary has triggered some sort of intermittent bug > After several weeks/months of running nsd stops forking with the new > zone data. > > A manual nsd-control transfer or even nsd-control force_transfer won?t > work, only restart of nsd solves the problem. > The only

Hi Chris, I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely shouldn't crash, still working on that. However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR. (Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and

On NetBSD 6.99.28-CURRENT, nsd 3.2.16 works fine, however nsd 4.0.0 is spinning chewing CPU. The logs show: Nov 28 23:07:00 xxx nsd[466]: sendmmsg failed: Resource temporarily unavailable ktruss shows it getting EAGAIN from sendmmsg(2) over and over again. According to the man page: [EAGAIN|EWOULDBLOCK] The socket is marked non-blocking and the requested