similar to: Tftp-hpa-0.48 ACKs error messages from tftp server

Hello, I am using the tftp-hpa 0.48 as delivered in Linux Fedora Core 9 as a client to send a file to another server on an unreliable network. The transaction is sometimes timing out. I have monitored the the TFTP packets to see what is missing. It seems a DATA packet is being lost. The server is repeating the ACKs for the previous packet every three seconds. I think these repeated ACKs are

Hello. Just to let everyone know: I've came across a motherboard with Intel Boot Agent GE 1.2.36 which is not able to get pxelinux.0 from tftpd-hpa 0.48 (configure ; make ; make install) without `-r blksize` option. Regards, Petya.

Hello, I'm trying to register a user using sipml5 on Asterisk 11. I followed the instructions here: http://thr3ads.net/asterisk-users/2012/08/1972342-Asterisk-Websockets I added transport=ws to my sip.conf file: [3002] username=3002 secret=XXXXXXXXX host=dynamic type=friend context=test disallow=all allow=g729 ;allow=all ; Allow codecs in order of preference allow=ilbc

I believe there has been a bug in KRL signature verification that has been present since the KRL feature was first introduced. It prevents signed KRLs from being loaded by OpenSSH [0]. I believe this bug applies to all versions of OpenSSH, although the majority of my effort has been devoted to (and all of my code snippets come from) openssl-portable. The bug is that an offset is incorrectly

Any ideas on why callers who call into my customer's SIP trunk are not hearing a ringback tone? I had this on one other asterisk system, and wound up needing to set progressinband=yes in the SIP trunk config. I have set this on the current system & restarted asterisk, but to no avail. I am using: AsteriskNOW distro Asterisk build is 1.6 from AsteriskNOW repository:

1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8? Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ . www.impalanetworks.com P: (505) 327-7300 F: (505) 327-7545

I haven't encountered this problem before. This is from a Compaq DL320, with Intel Boot Agent 4.0.17 and tftp-hpa-0.28 running on Solaris. The PXE stack gets its IP address just fine, but it times out on the TFTP. While snooping on the Solaris box and grepping for TFTP, I found that the box gets one block of the TFTP transfer just fine. TFTP Read "pxelinux.0" (octet)

Hello, I'm working on building Asterisk 11.4.0-rc1 with pjproject 2.1 instead of 2.0 due to a crashing issue resulting from ICE. https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-21696 Currently, I'm systematically going through each Makefile in every directory in pjproject and changing the paths that exist in the pjproject 2.0 included with Asterisk, so that I can successfully build

Hi, We have clients with various security & compliance requirements. Although not required, it would be ideal to have messages encrypted at rest. We already use SSL/TLS to secure the transmission of most email. However, it would be nice to have them encrypted sitting on our server. Is anyone doing this? I think that ideally, rather than full-disk encryption, we should use an encryption that

So, I'm trying to use this file to look inside COFF files. Got the header. OK. Now I want to look at the sections. Look, there's a section iterator. I can use that! So, I write: for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); iter != Obj.end_sections(); ++iter ) and it doesn't compile. There's no ++ for section iterators. Apparently, you're supposed to

If you haven't already found it, you should look inside tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp, which is an easy-to-follow example of how these APIs work --Sean Silva. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com>wrote: > So, I'm trying to use this file to look inside COFF files. > Got the header. OK. > > Now I want to look at the sections.

Hello all, I have a system running AsteriskNOW with asterisk asterisk-1.8.8.1-1_centos5 from AsteriskNOW repository. I just changed our Polycom 335 sip.conf so that blindpreferred=1 (all transfers default as blind transfers). If a customer calls in & we answer & transfer, everything works fine. But if we call out to a customer & then transfer to another internal extension, that

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > So, I'm trying to use this file to look inside COFF files. > Got the header. OK. > > Now I want to look at the sections. > Look, there's a section iterator. I can use that! > > So, I write: >        for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); iter !=

We are using samba 3.4.8. We have some pc's using OS Windows XP Pro dan others Windows 7 Pro. All of them can join and logon domain to samba PDC + LDAP. FYI, the windows 7 clients are already hacked at registry settings: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManWorkstation\Parameters] "DNSNameResolutionRequired"=dword:00000000

Hi, I currently have some systems on AsteriskNOW 1.7 & have been happy with its clean simplicity & reliability. Are many people here using AsteriskNOW 2.0.x? How do you feel about it? Did Digium stick with their previous philosophy of keeping everything very vanilla & making it clean & simple for someone who understands how to manage CentOS, FreePBX, tftp, ntpd, etc. but

Hello. I have a software developer creating a .Net / mono program to use as an AGI script. We are having problems getting it to stream files. From what we can tell, it is talking to asterisk correctly when called from the dial plan. Its stderr output goes to the asterisk console. But asterisk doesn't give any indication that it receives the STREAM FILE command. Asterisk simply quickly

Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > OK I am going with documentation not being right and/or I have been > very lucky with my installs. If you read https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/installation_guide/sect-disk-partitioning-setup-x86#sect-bootloader-mbr-gpt-x86 carefully, it seems to say that if you have UEFI and an MBR

Hi, I was asked by my boss if puppet can handle the following scenario. - 2 server (A and B) - same config for each server, eg. /etc/resolv.conf (nameserver 1.2.3.4) - but B should have a local unique requirement of another nameserver 5.6.7.8 so, A will have nameserver 1.2.3.4 but B will have nameserver 5.6.7.8 nameserver 1.2.3.4 when we change the global nameserver 1.2.3.4 to 9.8.7.6, it

Now that we've hashed out some thoughts on the most stable version of asterisk, I'd like to ask the question as to why I should NOT use 1.8? What are specific reasons? For instance a few days back I was speaking with James at Rhino Equipment. He said that he has "no real data" on why I shouldn't use 1.8. They just follow a practice of not jumping on the newest version. But I

I have an asterisk system where the asterisk daemon dies typically at least once per day. It is running in the wrapper safe_asterisk, which automatically starts the daemon back up. But we find this unacceptable because when the daemon dies, we usually have active calls drop, and sometimes we have to run asterisk -r -x "module reload" after the daemon starts back up before everything is