Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "HABTM and getting to arrays from either direction"
2006 Jul 03
6
help!
Hi,
i''m fairly new to ruby on rails, and i know the question at hand may
seem simple at first, but i''m getting really caught up in trying to
understand this and the docs aren''t giving me answer. i actually thought
i knew how the sql commands work (like :include, :conditions, :etc) but
obviously, i don''t.
there are three models M1, M2, M3 joined by a habtam
2006 Apr 29
5
HABTM - how to insert join row when associated rows exist
I have successfully used HABTM to create a many-to-one-to-many set of
rows in one step. Now, if two objects I want to associate already exist,
how do I create the join row? The Agile book mentions the
''push_with_attributes'' method. The text says this method is useful for
adding additional attributes to the join row (in the example a ''read_at''
timestamp). I
2006 Aug 10
2
check_box form helper questions/issues
I''m using Rails 1.1.x and it looks like the check_box form helper
expects me to provide and object and method so it can determine if the
checkbox should be checked or not. I''m having a couple of issues with
this.
note: I''m using UserEngine and adding a HABTM so that:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :foos
end
class foo <
2006 May 17
10
HABTM << producing incorrect insert sql ?
Greetings railsers -
I''m trying to add to a collection through HABTM, but the sql
insert is trying to insert a PK rather than letting mysql produce the
auto_increment''ed PK.
## @medication_dose holds a validated, saved model
@medication_dose.medication_frequencies << MedicationFrequency.find
(:all)
The above bails with,
Mysql::Error: #23000Duplicate
2006 Mar 13
3
HABTM: two habtm''s between the same two tables
Imagine I want to track people, and the clubs that they belong to.
table people with columns person_id, person_name
table clubs with columns club_id, club_name
And I have the association table:
table clubs_people with columns person_id, club_id
Now I know how to do this habtm between the two, in order to associate
people with clubs that they belong to.
However my application also needs a
2008 Dec 09
4
HABTM checkboxes insert but don't delete
I have a problem related with the HABTM relationships with checkboxes.
I''ve got a profile and a service model, both related with
has_and_belongs_to_many.
The problem is that i can insert new data in the profiles_services
table, however, i cant delete already existing data.
What could be the problem?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message
2006 Jun 30
2
how to HABTM with STI ??
Hello all
This is my first post so excuse the basic question. (and any repeats I just
got an email saying this post was too big so I have re-submitted a smaller
version)
I was following the thread on
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/2006-May/038988.html regarding
the STI on HABTM for RoR.
I have a very similar problem and was hoping for some help.
I have the
2006 Mar 09
4
habtm questions
I''ve got some of this working but other parts are ellusive.
I have
CREATE TABLE `bags` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`name` varchar(255) NOT NULL default '''',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
CREATE TABLE `packages` (
`id` int(255) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`name` varchar(255) NOT NULL default '''',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
CREATE TABLE
2006 May 18
3
Model Madness: habtm vs through
This has me scratching my head:
a Person has many Things
a Person has many Collections
a Collection has many Things
...Things in a Collection are ordered
...Things in a Collection can be related to (created by) any User
...a collection has additional attributes, such as a name etc
I am confused about habtm in rails (especially when using
acts_as_habtm_list) vs. going the :through route.
2006 May 23
2
HABTM for Dummies Question
Taking time off from programming is always painful :-).
I have the following Models:
====
class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :problems
end
class Problem < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_and_belongs_to_many :tags
end
====
And the following migrations:
====
create_table "problems" do |t|
t.column "user_id", :integer
2005 Dec 31
6
habtm recursion via destroy_without_callbacks
I am having a problem with two models that each have a HABTM
relationship to the other. For example:
CREATE TABLE people (id INT, name TEXT);
CREATE TABLE teams (id INT, name TEXT);
CREATE TABLE people_teams (person_id INT, team_id INT);
The person model has:
has_and_belongs_to_many :teams
And the team model has:
has_and_belongs_to_many :people
The trouble comes when trying to destroy
2006 Feb 19
4
Multiple HABTM to one table
I have a class Player, and a class Game.
Game has two HABTM relationships to the Player table through seperate
relationship tables.
class Game < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :players, :uniq => true
has_and_belongs_to_many :victors, :class_name => ''Player'', :uniq => true
end
When I add Player A to players, and Player B to victors, and save the
2006 May 05
4
STI and HABTM
Hey gang,
How does STI work with HABTM?
For instance...let''s say I have the following models
-----
Category < ActiveRecord::Base
Item < ActiveRecord::Base
Product < Item
Deal < Item
-----
Each product or deal can have categories. Would I then setup Item with
has_and_belongs_to_many :categories, then create a table categories_items
??? Is there a better way to do it?
2006 Jun 16
3
Does HABTM support non "id" FKs?
Quick question. Say I have a geographical database with counties and zip
codes where counties have and belong to many zip codes.
zip_codes (id, zip_code)
counties (id, name)
When I create the association table, the Rails way says to do the
following: counties_zip_codes (county_id, zip_code_id).
However, given that zip_codes.zip_code is itself a candidate key, I
would much prefer to do the
2006 Mar 28
3
Rails 1.1: Is HABTM obsolete?
Does the new has_many :through and belongs_to :through obsolete (well,
replace and essentially deprecate) has_and_belongs_to_many?
Joe
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2005 Dec 15
2
HABTM being tricky
I''ve just been bodyslammed by a problem with has_and_belongs_to_many -
as far as I can tell, if it doesn''t appear at the top of other
relationship definitions it doesn''t seem to work right. For example:
class Artist < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :genres
has_many :albums
has_many :videos
has_many :cds
has_many :collections
end
..works fine
2006 Feb 14
1
Another HABTM Question
Hi there,
I have a question on what would be the best way to save a HABTM model.
A posting habtm categories, and a category habtm postings.
class Category < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :postings
end
class Posting < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :categories
end
In my blog_controller, where the actual posting is saved, is where I
think I''m
2006 Jun 05
7
Is HABTM Dying?
For a while, I''ve been getting that HMT is replacing HABTM. It appears that
HMT can do all of what HABTM can do and more. The question is: Should I stop
using HABTM? Let''s take a simple case:
A case has many categories
For a given category, there are certain valid statuses
Category
has_and_belongs_to_many :statuses
Status
has_and_belongs_to_many :categories
Question:
Is
2010 Aug 18
6
Once I added this HABTM, one of my 'through' relationships, on a non-habtm model, seems to have broke?
I''m a rails newb and have been Googling about this, but I''m still stumped.
Not showing everything here, but basically it should be a pretty common
setup so I''m sure others know what I''m doing wrong.
- A meter can belong to many meter_groups
- A meter_group can have many meters.
- A user can ''subscribe'' to viewing a meter_group (Subscription)
2006 Jun 20
1
Preventing Dups in HABTM
I have a habtm that looks like:
report
has_and_belongs_to_many :subscribers
subscriber
has_and_belongs_to_many :reports
When I add a report to a subscriber, I have to run code like:
raise "already there, idiot!" unless
report.subscribers.find_by_id(subscriber_id).nil?
Is there a better way to avoid adding duplicative associations? has_many
:through seems like overkill for this