similar to: HABTM and getting to arrays from either direction

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "HABTM and getting to arrays from either direction"

2006 Jul 03
6
help!
Hi, i''m fairly new to ruby on rails, and i know the question at hand may seem simple at first, but i''m getting really caught up in trying to understand this and the docs aren''t giving me answer. i actually thought i knew how the sql commands work (like :include, :conditions, :etc) but obviously, i don''t. there are three models M1, M2, M3 joined by a habtam
2006 Apr 29
5
HABTM - how to insert join row when associated rows exist
I have successfully used HABTM to create a many-to-one-to-many set of rows in one step. Now, if two objects I want to associate already exist, how do I create the join row? The Agile book mentions the ''push_with_attributes'' method. The text says this method is useful for adding additional attributes to the join row (in the example a ''read_at'' timestamp). I
2006 Aug 10
2
check_box form helper questions/issues
I''m using Rails 1.1.x and it looks like the check_box form helper expects me to provide and object and method so it can determine if the checkbox should be checked or not. I''m having a couple of issues with this. note: I''m using UserEngine and adding a HABTM so that: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :foos end class foo <
2006 May 17
10
HABTM << producing incorrect insert sql ?
Greetings railsers - I''m trying to add to a collection through HABTM, but the sql insert is trying to insert a PK rather than letting mysql produce the auto_increment''ed PK. ## @medication_dose holds a validated, saved model @medication_dose.medication_frequencies << MedicationFrequency.find (:all) The above bails with, Mysql::Error: #23000Duplicate
2006 Mar 13
3
HABTM: two habtm''s between the same two tables
Imagine I want to track people, and the clubs that they belong to. table people with columns person_id, person_name table clubs with columns club_id, club_name And I have the association table: table clubs_people with columns person_id, club_id Now I know how to do this habtm between the two, in order to associate people with clubs that they belong to. However my application also needs a
2008 Dec 09
4
HABTM checkboxes insert but don't delete
I have a problem related with the HABTM relationships with checkboxes. I''ve got a profile and a service model, both related with has_and_belongs_to_many. The problem is that i can insert new data in the profiles_services table, however, i cant delete already existing data. What could be the problem? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message
2006 Jun 30
2
how to HABTM with STI ??
Hello all This is my first post so excuse the basic question. (and any repeats I just got an email saying this post was too big so I have re-submitted a smaller version) I was following the thread on http://lists.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/2006-May/038988.html regarding the STI on HABTM for RoR. I have a very similar problem and was hoping for some help. I have the
2006 Mar 09
4
habtm questions
I''ve got some of this working but other parts are ellusive. I have CREATE TABLE `bags` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(255) NOT NULL default '''', PRIMARY KEY (`id`) CREATE TABLE `packages` ( `id` int(255) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(255) NOT NULL default '''', PRIMARY KEY (`id`) CREATE TABLE
2006 May 18
3
Model Madness: habtm vs through
This has me scratching my head: a Person has many Things a Person has many Collections a Collection has many Things ...Things in a Collection are ordered ...Things in a Collection can be related to (created by) any User ...a collection has additional attributes, such as a name etc I am confused about habtm in rails (especially when using acts_as_habtm_list) vs. going the :through route.
2006 May 23
2
HABTM for Dummies Question
Taking time off from programming is always painful :-). I have the following Models: ==== class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :problems end class Problem < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user has_and_belongs_to_many :tags end ==== And the following migrations: ==== create_table "problems" do |t| t.column "user_id", :integer
2005 Dec 31
6
habtm recursion via destroy_without_callbacks
I am having a problem with two models that each have a HABTM relationship to the other. For example: CREATE TABLE people (id INT, name TEXT); CREATE TABLE teams (id INT, name TEXT); CREATE TABLE people_teams (person_id INT, team_id INT); The person model has: has_and_belongs_to_many :teams And the team model has: has_and_belongs_to_many :people The trouble comes when trying to destroy
2006 Feb 19
4
Multiple HABTM to one table
I have a class Player, and a class Game. Game has two HABTM relationships to the Player table through seperate relationship tables. class Game < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :players, :uniq => true has_and_belongs_to_many :victors, :class_name => ''Player'', :uniq => true end When I add Player A to players, and Player B to victors, and save the
2006 May 05
4
STI and HABTM
Hey gang, How does STI work with HABTM? For instance...let''s say I have the following models ----- Category < ActiveRecord::Base Item < ActiveRecord::Base Product < Item Deal < Item ----- Each product or deal can have categories. Would I then setup Item with has_and_belongs_to_many :categories, then create a table categories_items ??? Is there a better way to do it?
2006 Jun 16
3
Does HABTM support non "id" FKs?
Quick question. Say I have a geographical database with counties and zip codes where counties have and belong to many zip codes. zip_codes (id, zip_code) counties (id, name) When I create the association table, the Rails way says to do the following: counties_zip_codes (county_id, zip_code_id). However, given that zip_codes.zip_code is itself a candidate key, I would much prefer to do the
2006 Mar 28
3
Rails 1.1: Is HABTM obsolete?
Does the new has_many :through and belongs_to :through obsolete (well, replace and essentially deprecate) has_and_belongs_to_many? Joe -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2005 Dec 15
2
HABTM being tricky
I''ve just been bodyslammed by a problem with has_and_belongs_to_many - as far as I can tell, if it doesn''t appear at the top of other relationship definitions it doesn''t seem to work right. For example: class Artist < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :genres has_many :albums has_many :videos has_many :cds has_many :collections end ..works fine
2006 Feb 14
1
Another HABTM Question
Hi there, I have a question on what would be the best way to save a HABTM model. A posting habtm categories, and a category habtm postings. class Category < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :postings end class Posting < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :categories end In my blog_controller, where the actual posting is saved, is where I think I''m
2006 Jun 05
7
Is HABTM Dying?
For a while, I''ve been getting that HMT is replacing HABTM. It appears that HMT can do all of what HABTM can do and more. The question is: Should I stop using HABTM? Let''s take a simple case: A case has many categories For a given category, there are certain valid statuses Category has_and_belongs_to_many :statuses Status has_and_belongs_to_many :categories Question: Is
2010 Aug 18
6
Once I added this HABTM, one of my 'through' relationships, on a non-habtm model, seems to have broke?
I''m a rails newb and have been Googling about this, but I''m still stumped. Not showing everything here, but basically it should be a pretty common setup so I''m sure others know what I''m doing wrong. - A meter can belong to many meter_groups - A meter_group can have many meters. - A user can ''subscribe'' to viewing a meter_group (Subscription)
2006 Jun 20
1
Preventing Dups in HABTM
I have a habtm that looks like: report has_and_belongs_to_many :subscribers subscriber has_and_belongs_to_many :reports When I add a report to a subscriber, I have to run code like: raise "already there, idiot!" unless report.subscribers.find_by_id(subscriber_id).nil? Is there a better way to avoid adding duplicative associations? has_many :through seems like overkill for this