similar to: Proxmox VE 1.0 released today

Greetings, I'm a big OpenVZ fanboy. I've sent a few emails on this list that proves that... and I'm sure I've annoyed some people... but be that as it may... I would like to draw everyone on this list's attention to Proxmox VE. What is Proxmox VE? Here's a review from the end of June: ProxMox: The high-performance virtualization server for the rest of us

Scott thanks ever so much for your response - yes that answers the question. Thanks, M > On 20 Apr 2018, at 13:00, centos-virt-request at centos.org wrote: > > Send CentOS-virt mailing list submissions to > centos-virt at centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > or, via

Greetings, So, anyone on this list using OS Virtualization? I've been using OpenVZ for about 1.5 years. I also have some experience with Linux-VServer. In my experience, if you want to do Linux on Linux, both OpenVZ and Linux-VServer offer native performance, better scalability, and higher density than VMware, Xen or KVM... although I must admit I haven't actually tried KVM yet. If

Greetings, I was reading the LWN article from today (free to non-subscribers next Thursday). Here's a subscriber link for those who might want to see it now: CentOS and Red Hat - http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/592723/485ea802859f6c36/ I saw that Xen was mentioned as an area where CentOS went beyond RHEL with CentOS 6... and being that I'm deeply in the OpenVZ community, I thought it

Greetings, ----- Original Message ----- > I've recently come across a thread in the CentOS forums [0] regarding > the solution to getting hardware requiring the cciss driver, such as HP > ProLiant G5 systems, to install and boot with CentOS 7. The thread was a > start in the right direction, but I believe I've determined a better > workflow and feel that it would benefit

Greetings, First start of by working on a physical system, virtual machine, or container that matches the OS Template you are wanting to build. I used my CentOS 7 Public QA OS OpenVZ container to build it. You must of course have a working yum. Once we are beyond Public QA and there is stuff in /etc/yum.repos.d/ this won't be a problem. One thing to note is that the --enablerepo= must

Greetings, ----- Original Message ----- > Yeah, there are a lot of possibilities to my problem. But it is harder > to verify a hypothesis than coming up with one. So, do you have any > specific commands for the verification purpose? I'm not sure what you mean by "specific commands for verification process". Step 1, delete the troubled package and erase it from your

Greetings, I just signed up on the CentOS Wiki as user ScottDowdle. I'd like to update one page and add a new page... so when a AdminGroup user notices and has the time to do the deed, please allow me the following: 1) Update - http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BrokenVserver I would like to add an explanation on why some VPSes do not include yum. I'm a long time member of the

WorkShop Virtualiza??o com Proxmox VE ------------------------------ <https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?s=100&p[url]=http://blog.konnectati.com.br/arquivos/1276> Dia 12 de Julho, S?bado, a partir das 08hs00 acontecer? o WorkShop Virtualiza??o com Proxmox VE. Venha conhecer uma das melhores ferramentas de Virtualiza??o do Mercado. Com este treinamento, sua equipe de TI ter?

Greetings, I want to thank the CentOS Documentation Team for allowing me to create the new wiki page for "OpenVZ on CentOS". I wrote it quite quickly today and I have to admit I this is my first wiki article and the syntax is completely new to me. As a result it is probably ugly. Any formatting help would be appreciated. Also, I should have proof read it better... and will do so

hello before asking my question I come My name is Santiago and I''m from Spain but I''m in Colombia I followed this guide: https://www.doas.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html but when I run shorewall check, this error occurs: Checking... Initializing... Determining Zones... IPv4 Zones: net loc Firewall Zone: fw Validating interfaces file... ERROR: Invalid

Hello, I am testing Tinc and I successfully created a link between 2 nodes. I have some doubts about subnet behaviour. This is my scenario: Switch: LAN IP 10.100.10.100 Connected to WAN and Proxmox node Proxmox node: bridge interface with public IP , connected to switch LXC with public IP, assigned to bridge I create a Tinc VPN between Home host and Proxmox on net 10.100.10.0 Home host

OK, ok, let's put an end to this thread. We are all dilettantes and further discussion would be just a waster of time, as is everywhere in online forums. Fortunately I don't have critical tasks to run on linux. Thank everyone for your involvement. Hope I can find the link to quit here. On 1/17/2015 1:11 PM, Scott Dowdle wrote: > Greetings, > > ----- Original Message -----

Hello all. I'm wondering if anyone on this list has come across the need to convert a Proxmox VM to a libvirt VM. Given that they use the same underlying technology (qemu/KVM), I'm pretty sure it's possible and just a matter of hashing out the differences in configuration (i.e. creating the necessary libvirt xml for the Proxmox disk), but figured I'd ask here first in case

Tru has already been building vmware images ( http://people.centos.org/tru/vmware/ ) for various roles. I was wondering if there was any interest in prebuilt Xen images as well ? And if so, what would be the roles people would want images done for, and what might be suiteable package sets to include for those roles. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq

Hola a todos, perdonar que escriba en español pero no tengo traductor a mano.. intento configurar shorewall siguiendo esta guía: http://www.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html pero me dice esto con el shorewall check: Checking /etc/shorewall/interfaces... ERROR: Unknown zone (dmz) : /etc/shorewall/interfaces (line 16) ¿cómo puedo definirla en el archivo de zonas? gracias y perdonar

----- "Bruce B" <bruceb444 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > Is there other comparable products to Proxmox to be used for Asterisk instances? Ease of use, web interface, and Asterisk/CentOS support would be ideal. There is OpenNode: http://opennode.activesys.org/ I've heard good things thus far but have not had time nor need to test it myself. --Tim

Hi everyone, I just lunched a CentOS VM in Proxmox and used the Digium repository to install Asterisk using "yum install asterisk16"...and it works great. Runs and it seems to have installed ztdummy as well without the need to touch the host node. But when I try to compile Dahdi from source on the same VM to install Asterisk from source I get this: #@root/usr/src/dahdi/: *make all*

Hi everybody. I''m trying to configure shorewall folowing this manual: http://www.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html But with shorewall check it tells me thah: Checking /etc/shorewall/interfaces... ERROR: Unknown zone (dmz) : /etc/shorewall/interfaces (line 16) How can I define it in the zone file? thanks for the help. best regards, Santiago.

I'm new to the CentOS arena and I'm curious as to what virtualization products are preferred? The two main ones that I know of are Xen and VMWare. VMWare seems to be the most capable inre: number and size of vm's allowed. When looking at Xen it appears that since Citrix acquired them the free version is cripple-ware and is very restrictive. Thanks in advance for any information.