similar to: kvm-69

may here someone can answer me... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.2 i386 and x86_64 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:31:20 +0200 From: Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org> References: <4860E6EB.5000906 at centos.org> Karanbir Singh wrote: > > We are

hi, it seems our latest liebertgxt2 patch still missing from the just released 2.6.0. i'm attached the patch to the 2.6.0. this patch: - add the possibility to properly shutdown the ups, - can be used through usb-serial adapter cable too. could you apply it to the source. regards. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -------------- next part

hi, while all files is owned by nsd user and nsd run as nsd the nsd.db is still owned by root user (because the compiler run as root and create this file as root, ok i know just it'd be better if this file is owned by nsd too). another strange thing is that on the slave nsd i've got such messages: ----------------------------------------- zonec: reading zone "lfarkas.org".

Hi, May be it's not clear to everyone.. so this's just a quick notice to everyone. Don't use CentOS 7 as a developer workstation since currently there is not included any developer IDE. As eclipse was pulled out from the main distro and put into Red Hat Developer Toolset (which is imho a good idea not to use a 7 years old IDE). But Red Hat Developer Toolset is still not supported on

hi, we use openvpn as for our vpn endpoints and we''ve got about 70-80 vpn connections which means we have tun0 - tun80 interface. i''d like to define one zone for all of our vpn connections how can I do that? actualy our local zone is 192.168.0.0/17 (not 16) and all of the vpn''s are in 192.168.128.0/17. our should i define somehow the local zone as 192.168.0.0/16? but in

hi, we've got (and getting more) serious problem with load. I'm just calculate that ther is about 300 mailbox with 20Gb mails. and the whole system is _very_ slow and just getting slower and slower. it's a fast lan every client has 100Mb connection to the server with gigabit crad and gigabit switches. when I push the delete button in a mail I usualy have to wait 10,20 or 30

hi, so yesterday I move the whole mail system to a better machine. the only thing which is running on this system is dovect and: -------------------------------------------------- 10:44am up 6 days, 25 min, 3 users, load average: 28.03, 17.96, 9.05 233 processes: 231 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU0 states: 3.1% user, 29.4% system, 0.0% nice, 66.4% idle CPU1 states: 7.1%

hi, we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create it in a redundant way ie: - if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole filesystem still usable and consistent. - any server in this farm can see the same storage/filesystem. it's someting a big network raid5-6... storage where

hi, I'm just recoginze that dovecot contains an rpm spec file. unfortunately it's not too useful since an rpm -ta dovecot-.x.y.tar.gz can't be used since just the dovecot.spec.in is in the tarbar and not the actual spec file (which is in this from not useful in the above form). anyway here is my patch to the spec.in. -- Levente "Si vis pacem

We have experianced a strang behavior with QuarkXPress files. These files can be opened/modified/saved by user a, user b can open/modify the file but saving is not possible. With all other applications open/modify/save files is possible. We use: SuSE8.1, Samba 2.2.5, reiserfs. Directories/files are set 2770 Thank you for your help Markus

hi, i've got a centos-5 x86_64 kvm-35 host system with one centos-5 i386 and one x86_64 guests. but none of the guest are able to restart. ie. i login to the guests and restart it. it start's as normal reboot, but after the last command (shuting down md device) it's do nothing, but in virt-manager i see 50% load on the guest. the biggest problem currently i can't find any way to

hi, it'd be useful to include the latest stable samba packages in the centosplus, since samba.org do not build binaries for rhel just for old redhat and fedora releases. yours. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

hi, after we switch our servers from centos-3 to centos-4 (aka. rhel-4) one of our server always crash once a week without any oops. this happneds with both the normal kernel-2.6.9-11.EL and kernel-2.6.9-11.106.unsupported. after we change the motherboard, the raid contorller and the cables too we still got it. finally we start netdump and last but not least yesterday we got a crash log and a

2009/10/15 Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> > hi, > i read your thread at: > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2009-January/003772.html > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2009-January/003775.html > we've got exactly the same problem that we need a nut driver for liebert > ups. is there any progress in this field?

Hi Does anyone know when KVM-70 or higher would be available in CentOs or CentoOS extras repository. (for version CentOS 5.x) The only place that I know of is here. http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/ Thanks /Jd

I see that kvm has been updated since Sept. 08 2007, and qemu hasn't since Sept. 12 2007. I understand that redhat is migrating from xen to kvm, I'm curious if that has provoked this reduced maintenance or if interest was just lost. If this is of interest to others, Qemu 0.9.1 does provide a lot more features lacking in 0.9.0 that I would like to use, including virtio and e1000 NIC

hi, after i test nsd i find the following. if i use this in a zone file: $ORIGIN example.com. CNAME www www CNAME x x A 1.2.3.4 then it's excepted by nsd what's more give the proper result. if the slave is nsd than there is no problem, while if the slave is bind i've got the following error:

hi, i create rule such action.AllowPostGrey: ----------------------------------------------- ###################################################################################### #TARGET SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE RATE USER/ # PORT PORT(S) LIMIT GROUP ACCEPT $A_IP $PORTAL_IP tcp 10023 ACCEPT

hi, i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more complicated then i thought. the sources was: - Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29 http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/ unfortunately the link disappear a few days ago but i've got the src.rpm - rhel7 mariadb-5.5.33a-3.el7.src.rpm - fedora's mariadb-5.5.35-4.fc21.src.rpm - rhel6's scl's

Hi, we are running Centos 5.2 on our servers for some time now and are really happy with it. Now I'm investigating the best way to setup virtual machines in order to streamline our infrastructure. The setup I'm aiming for is Centos 5.2 guests on Centos 5.2 host. The physical systems are going to be 2xquad core Xeons and the VMs are probably going to be 1 or 2 vCPUs with 1 or 2 gb of