similar to: SELinux

Hi All, I'm running CentOS 5.2 with SELinux in enforcing mode (default targeted policy). The server hosts a PHP web app that sends mail. I'm getting the following errors (see end of message) in my selinux audit.log file every time the app sends an email. The email always seems to get sent successfully, despite the log messages. However, they do concern me and I would like to understand

Using audit2allow, I was able to create a policy module for selinux: audit2allow -i /var/log/audit/audit.log -M mysqld (creates mysqld.pp and mysqld.te) I want to distribute this to all my puppet clients. I can easily put this file in /etc/selinux/targeted/modules/active/modules But even after reboot, although I can see the module listed: semodule -l ... it doesn''t seem to actually

On 12/04/2014 03:22 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote: >> Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean setting >> needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . . >> > Anyone see any problem with generating a custom policy consisting of the > following? > > grep avc

I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6 virtual guest: ---- time->Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2698 pid=4294 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=2784 comm="trivial-rewrite"

Hello, I am trying to create a custom policy, but with no succes : $ cat <<EOF> foo.te module local 1.0; require { type httpd_sys_script_exec_t; type httpd_sys_script_t; class lnk_file read; } #============= httpd_sys_script_t ============== allow httpd_sys_script_t httpd_sys_script_exec_t:lnk_file read; EOF $ checkmodule -M -m -o foo.mod foo.te checkmodule:

hi, i want set selinux to usw with ntpd but when i run (as described in wiki) semanage -a -t ntpd_t "/usr/local/samba/var/lib/ntp_signd" i have that error " usage: semanage [-h] {import,export,login,user,port,ibpkey,ibendport,interface,module,node,fcontext,boolean,permissive,dontaudit} ... semanage: error: argument subcommand: invalid choice:

I have a webpage feedback form that uses a Perl script to send e-mails with "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -t". It works just fine, but SELinux is complaining about it: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/postdrop (postfix_postdrop_t) "getattr" to pipe:[41117] (httpd_t) I'm a SELinux newb so I don't know what (if anything) to do about it. Suggestions? Miark

Not a problem ... sharing a solution (this time)! Please correct my understanding of the process, if required. "i_stream_read() failed: Permission denied" is an error message generated when a large-ish file (>128kb in my case) is attached to a message that has been passed to Dovecot's deliver program when SELinux is being enforced. In my case, these messages are first run

Installed Packages Name : postfix Arch : x86_64 Epoch : 2 Version : 2.6.6 Release : 6.el6_5 Size : 9.7 M Repo : installed >From repo : updates I am seeing several of these in our maillog file after a restart of the Postfix service: Apr 23 12:48:27 inet08 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp from 'read, write'

On Feb 26, 2020, at 08:52, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > >> Le 26/02/2020 ? 11:51, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit : >> SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python2.7 from read access on the file disable. >> ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ***** >> If you believe that python2.7 should be allowed read access on the disable file by default.

Hi, I've got a Centos 5 box (recently replaced a Centos4 box of the same function). The means of applying custom SELinux policy has changed somewhat from 4->5. I've got it mostly figured out; I have a local.te file with my custom policy and also which defines a few new file types, and a local.fc with appropriate defintions of file contexts. When I run: # checkmodule -M -m -o

Hey guys, I've been getting some strange selinux messages after the 5.3 upgrade. It appears as though my mail system (postfix) is constantly trying to access the rpm database? Here's the audit messages (I tend to look at my selinux messages using audit2allow < /var/log/audit.log as I find it easier to read quickly): allow postfix_postdrop_t rpm_t:tcp_socket { read write }; allow

Hello, I'm using HP homeserver where host system run CentOS 6.3 with KVM virtualization with SELinux enabled, guests too run the same OS (but without SELinux, but this does not matter). Host system installed on mirrors based on sda and sdb physical disks. sd{c..f} disks attached to KVM guest (whole disks, not partitions; needed to use zfs (zfsonlinux) benefit features). Problem is that disks

Hello CentOS Docs People! I recently used the Amavisd howto to setup a couple of mailservers, which saved me from hours of searching online and reading novels of documentation. Since Ned is taking a little break from the Amavisd page, I would like to help contribute. There were a few things I'd like to add, like GTUBE/EICAR testing and SELinux config lines. My wiki username is WilliamFong.

Le mardi 25 avril 2017 ? 10:39 +0200, Robert Moskowitz a ?crit : > Thanks Laurent. You obviously know a LOT more about SELinux than I. I > pretty much just use commands and not build policies. So I need some > more information here. > > From what you provided below, how do I determine what is currently in > place and how do I add your stuff (changing postgresql with

Le mardi 25 avril 2017 ? 10:04 +0200, Robert Moskowitz a ?crit : > I thought I had this fixed, but I do not. I was away from this problem > working on other matters, and came back (after a reboot) and it is still > there, so I suspect when I thought I had it 'fixed' I was running with > setenforce 0 from another problem (that is fixed). > > So anyone know how to get

Hi, Some time ago I had SELinux problems with Fail2ban. One of the users on this list suggested that it might be due to the fact that I'm using a bone-headed iptables script instead of FirewallD. I've spent the past few weeks getting up to date with doing things in a more orthodox manner. So currently my internet-facing CentOS server has a nicely configured NetworkManager, and

Having problems starting httpd & portmapper #service httpd start /usr/sbin/httpd: error while loading shared libraries: libm.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory and I traced it to selinux, which I had just turned on for the first time: # sestatus SELinux status: enabled SELinuxfs mount: /selinux Current mode:

????????? ???????? ????? 2016-07-05 19:58: >> I need to have the tftpdir_rw_t and samba_share_t SELinux context >> on >> the same directory. >> >> How can we do this? Is it feasible to have more than one SELinux >> context? > > I don't think it's possible/feasible. > You'd probably need to add a new type and necessary rules to your

I am seeing these in the log of one of our off-site NX hosts running CentOS-6.6. type=AVC msg=audit(1421683972.786:4372): avc: denied { create } for pid=22788 comm="iptables" scontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tclass=rawip_socket Was caused by: Missing type enforcement (TE) allow rule. You can use