similar to: samba failover with ctdb and client-visible errors

Hi All I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba 4.7.1 The node network is a direct 1Gb link Storage is Cephfs ctdb status is OK It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following in my log.smbd: [2018/09/18 19:16:15.897742, 0] > ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal) > db_ctdb_fetch_locked for

Hi, I came across the 'CTDB_CAPABILITY_LMASTER=no' and 'CTDB_CAPABILITY_RECMASTER=no' options in my quest to salvage a rather poorly performing CTDB cluster over Ceph(fs). Unfortunately, the docs provide not enough information for a clustering noop like myself. Would there be any benefit to disabling those options for a branch office node on a high-latency WAN connection?

Ubuntu 14.04, ctdb 2.5.3, samba 4.1.11. CTDB is working with IP takeover between the 2 nodes. The machine is joined to the domain. Any help with the following errors would be most gratefully received. 1. connect to socket error: ctdb status 2014/08/16 15:32:03.248034 [23255]: client/ctdb_client.c:267 Failed to connect client socket to daemon. Errno:Connection refused(111) common/cmdline.c:156

Very helpful. Thank you, Martin. I'd like to share the information below with you and solicit your fine feedback :-) I provide additional detail in case there is something else you feel strongly we should consider. We made some changes last night, let me share those with you. The error that is repeating itself and causing these failures is: Takeover run starting RELEASE_IP 10.200.1.230

Could I impose upon someone to provide some guidance? Some hint? Thank you Is a shared file system actually required? If etcd is used to manage the global recovery lock, is there any need at that point for a shared file system? In other words, are there samba or CTDB files (state) that must be on a shared file system, or can each clustered host simply have these files locally? What must be

Hello, i'm still trying to find out what is the right path for ctdb.conf (ubuntu 18.04, samba was compiled from source!!). When im trying to start CTDB without any config file, my log in /usr/local/samba/var/log/log.ctdb shows me: 2018/05/07 12:56:44.363513 ctdbd[4503]: Failed to read nodes file "/usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb/nodes" 2018/05/07 12:56:44.363546 ctdbd[4503]: Failed to

greetings, trying to follow tridge's failover process at http://samba.org/~tridge/ctdb_movies/node_disable.html I encounter this error. oss02:~ # smbstatus -np Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[profiles]" Processing section "[users]" Processing section "[groups]" Processing section "[local]" Processing section

Hi Martin Many thanks for the detailed response. A few follow-ups inline: On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:19 AM Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:34:25 +0100, David C via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, > Samba > > 4.7.1

Am 27.01.23 um 12:10 schrieb Bj?rn Baumbach: > Hi Stefan, > > On 1/27/23 08:57, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> Am 26.01.23 um 22:57 schrieb Martin Schwenke: >>> winbindd and smbd are only started during the CTDB startup event, so >>> you have to enable the event scripts before you start CTDB. >>> >> That's what I did and that's where the

Hi Stefan, On 1/27/23 16:16, Stefan Kania wrote: > The only difference between my test environment and the production > system is, that I have two server with Ubuntu and one with Debian, BUT > both with the same sernet-packages, and the same nodes- and > public_addresses-files. Still ctdb is running IP-failover works, but as > soon I enable one of the events there is no way to

drbd ctdb ocfs2 Hi Everything seems OK apart from the IP takeover. public_addresses 192.168.1.80/24 enp0s3 192.168.1.81/24 enp0s3 ctdb status Number of nodes:2 pnn:0 192.168.1.10 PARTIALLYONLINE pnn:1 192.168.1.11 PARTIALLYONLINE (THIS NODE) Generation:2090727463 Size:2 hash:0 lmaster:0 hash:1 lmaster:1 Recovery mode:NORMAL (0) Recovery master:1 but we are getting: 2014/07/11

I am attempting to enable IPv6 on our CTDB setup. I have placed the IPv6 address in the public_addresses file with the correct prefix. The addresses never come up and I recieve these messages in the log 2012/06/28 10:54:43.313227 [ 1820]: Async operation failed with ret=0 res=1 opcode=0 2012/06/28 10:54:43.313918 [ 1820]: Async operation failed with ret=0 res=1 opcode=0 2012/06/28

Hi there ? I seem to be having trouble wrapping my brain about the CTDB and ganesha configuration. I thought I had it figured out, but it doesn?t seem to be doing any checking of the nfs-ganesha service. I put nfs-ganesha-callout as executable in /etc/ctdb I create nfs-checks-ganesha.d folder in /etc/ctdb and in there I have 20.nfs_ganesha.check In my ctdbd.conf file I have: # Options to

Hi guys, I try to set up two identical installed up to date CentOS6 machines with Glusterfs/CTDB/Samba . I have set up Glusterfs and it works. I have set up CTDB from CentOS and it seems to work too. Samba is AD integrated and works mainly. The main problem is that file locking seem to not work between the machines at all. If two Win7 clients try to open an document from the same Samba server

How did you mount your cephfs filesystem? Am 18. September 2018 20:34:25 MESZ schrieb David C via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >Hi All > >I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, >Samba >4.7.1 > >The node network is a direct 1Gb link > >Storage is Cephfs > >ctdb status is OK > >It seems to be running well so far but

Hi 2 node drbd cluster with ocfs2. both nodes: openSUSE 4.1.9 with drbd 8.4 and ctdbd 2.3 All seems OK with ctdb: n1: ctdb status Number of nodes:2 pnn:0 192.168.0.10 OK (THIS NODE) pnn:1 192.168.0.11 OK Generation:1187222392 Size:2 hash:0 lmaster:0 hash:1 lmaster:1 Recovery mode:NORMAL (0) Recovery master:0 n2: ctdb status Number of nodes:2 pnn:0 192.168.0.10 OK pnn:1 192.168.0.11

Hi, [Context : ubuntu 11.11 64bits, cman, clvmd, gfs2, ctdb, samba, likewise-open, all running fine except...] I've setup ctdb to manage public_addresses (to manage one virtual ip actually), and I've explicitely told smb.conf that netbios name = foobar_cluster I've done that *after* I've manage to make samba, likewise-open and AD to work nicely together. I guess now all the

Hello, at this time i want to install a CTDB Cluster with SAMBA 4.7.7 from SOURCE! I compiled samba as follow: |./configure| |--with-cluster-support ||--with-shared-modules=idmap_rid,idmap_tdb2,idmap_ad| The whole SAMBA enviroment is located in /usr/local/samba/. CTDB is located in /usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb. I guess right that the correct path of ctdbd.conf (node file, public address file

Hi everybody, I have tested CTDB+GFS2+CMAN under Debian. It works good but I do not understand some points. It is possible to run the CTDB defining it under services section in cluster.conf but running it on the second node shuts down the process at the first one. My CTDB configuration implies 2 active-active nodes. Does CTDB care if the node starts with clean_start="0" or

Hi to all, I'm having a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes (both Ubuntu wit Sernet-packages 4.17.4). Now I want to replace one of the nodes. The first step was to bring a new node to the CTDB-Cluster. This time a Debian 11 but with the same sernet-packages (4.17.4). Adding the new node to /etc/ctdb/nodes at the end of the list. And the virtual IP to /etc/ctdb/public_addresses, also at the end