similar to: 7.0 - slow/unstable Internet access via Linux router

Hi Yonghyeon and All, >From time to time I use a notebook and boot FreeBSD from USB stick. FreeBSD 9.2-i386 works OK. So I tried to use FreeBSD 10.0-i386 BETA2 and the network adapter works for some 10-15 seconds and then stops with diagnostic message "msk0:watchdog timeout". I've found similar case at freebsd-current@ with no workaround. Yes, there is an interrupt storm as well.

Hi, Whilst doing some QA work on XORP on my desktop, which has fxp0 and msk0, fxp0 got totally hosed. I was running PIM-SM and IGMPv2 router-mode on the box at the time. I wonder if this is related to the problems with fxp multicast transmission I saw back in April. I'm a bit concerned about this as fxp is still a very widespread and useful network chip. I am running

Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the following interface: msk0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c011b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,TSO4,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE> ether 00:11:2f:2a:c7:03 inet 10.0.1.199 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 inet6 fe80::211:2fff:fe2a:c703%msk0 prefixlen 64 scopeid

Hi I installed the following driver. http://www.f.csce.kyushu-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki//software/freebsd-nfe.html Before I had the nve driver which was unstable on this server and on a prior server in both cases causing either spontaneous reboot or just a crash when under load. So far touchwood the nfe driver has stayed up and running at almost 3 days uptime and has had some stress. I know the driver

1. I have a realtek network card and am using a cable modem router. Does anyone know if fixes for problems with these (see below) have been backported from HEAD to RELENG_7? 2. Is this a good time to upgrade to RELENG_7? 3. I read a post last week that advised that 7.1 is a long way off. Appreciate any advice on use of ULE 3.0 and ZFS prior to 7.1 and a comment on what is holding up 7.1. Thanks

We have 10 SuperMicro PDSMi+ 5015M-MTs that are panic'ing every few days. This started shortly after upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE with freebsd-update. Other than switching to a debugging kernel, a little sysctl tuning, and patching with freebsd-update, they are stock. The debugging kernel was built from source that is also being patched with freebsd-update. These systems are

Hi list, Are there any problems with the if_re ? After upgrade RELENG_7 on my laptop NIC stopped to work:( uname -a: FreeBSD notebook.minsk.domain 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #3: Fri Apr 10 20:38:55 EEST 2009 root@notebook.minsk.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/tiger-asus-a6m i386 notebook# dhclient re0 DHCPDISCOVER on re0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 3 DHCPDISCOVER on re0 to

Hello Got strange problem with high system "%system load" and very slow user level programs (apache+php+mysql) behavior gstat shows 1.5-4% hard disk busy load but system shows about 20-30% load while user load is max 5%. vmstat shows from 2 to 35 process in "b" state. Now use 7.0-RELEASE-p5 , but the same problem was with 7.0-RELEASE. And have no idea what to do with this.

Hi, during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules we provide, the need for a custom kernel should be small, but on the other hand, we do not provide a small kernel-skeleton where you can load just the modules you need.

Hello, it it possible to get a kind of diagnostics if the variable is totally optimized away? For example, in: void foo (struct some_type *obj) { ... some code where 'obj' is not used ... bar (obj->some_member); ... some code where 'obj' is not used again ... baz (obj->some_member); } 'obj' is likely to be optimized away so only

I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE over Asus P5Q motherboard. Such board comes with an nic requiring age0 driver. When the nic is under load, such trasferring big amount of data over gigabit connection (let's say some gigabyte backups), the computer hangs, sometimes with panic, sometimes freezing. Before that i was using an Intel nic with em0 driver and 7.0-Stable#2.. and that

Hi, I have a Dell T710 with 4 X 10G ethernet interfaces (2 X Dual port Intel 82599 cards). It is running FreeBSD RELENG_8 last updated on July 13. What I see is packet loss (0 - 40%) on IPv6 packets in vlans, when the machine is not the originator of the packets. Let me try to describe a little more. If a neigbouring machine ping6 it, there will be packet loss. If it act as a router for ipv6,

Now that we have SCTP offload capabilities in the kernel, we can add them to virtio as well. First step is SCTP checksum. We need a new freature in virtio to negotiate this support since SCTP is excluded with the stardard checksum and requires a little bit extra. This series proposes VIRTIO_NET_F_SCTP_CSUM feature bit. As the "little bit extra", the kernel uses a new bit in the skb

On 04/02/2018 10:47 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 09:40:01AM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote: >> Now that we have SCTP offload capabilities in the kernel, we can add >> them to virtio as well. First step is SCTP checksum. > > Thanks. > >> As for GSO, the way sctp GSO is currently implemented buys us nothing >> in added support

On 04/02/2018 10:47 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 09:40:01AM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote: >> Now that we have SCTP offload capabilities in the kernel, we can add >> them to virtio as well. First step is SCTP checksum. > > Thanks. > >> As for GSO, the way sctp GSO is currently implemented buys us nothing >> in added support

Now that we have SCTP offload capabilities in the kernel, we can add them to virtio as well. First step is SCTP checksum. We need a new freature in virtio to negotiate this support since SCTP is excluded with the stardard checksum and requires a little bit extra. This series proposes VIRTIO_NET_F_SCTP_CSUM feature bit. As the "little bit extra", the kernel uses a new bit in the skb

Now that we have SCTP offload capabilities in the kernel, we can add them to virtio as well. First step is SCTP checksum. We need a new freature in virtio to negotiate this support since SCTP is excluded with the stardard checksum and requires a little bit extra. This series proposes VIRTIO_NET_F_SCTP_CSUM feature bit. As the "little bit extra", the kernel uses a new bit in the skb

Hello All, I mentioned a problem with this once before, and was referred to other threads that also talked about this. But I believe a recent problem I was experiencing, may have been related to this: [: -le: argument expected. So I'd like to bring it up again, in hopes that someone might have a cure. Specifically, two printf()'s are sent to the same line, which results in a /very/ hard

Greetings, Are there any plans to import SCTP support to OpenSSH? There have been SCTP patches for OSX and FreeBSD, and those seem to work pretty decently. I guess there might quite a number of potential users for SCTP were it part of the common source tree. A second benefit of having SCTP support as a standard feature in OpenSSH for all platforms supporting SCTP would be kind of social pressure

Hi, I have written a patch to add SCTP support for OpenSSH on systems with SCTP capabilities with the following features: - SCTP support can be configured with --with-sctp, but is disabled by default - use SCTP for SSH connections instead of TCP - SCTP's multi-homing is activated for all available addresses by default, if SCTP is used - the sshd can be configured to listen with TCP, SCTP, or